Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

111. Revamping Journal Club with Blogs and Logs to Lift the Fog Scott Kaatz, DO Kimberly Baker-Genaw, MD William Morse Sean Drake, MD Presentation Content 6.08 from 13 responses 6.23 from 13 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: This was farily good. Drawback was that the blog portion wasn’t practical for me to implement at my small community program. Would need a lot more IT support and a critical mass of residents to make it work. Great ideas for journal club, though. Excellent ideas. Great overview of helpful tools. No pie in the sky, all could be applied to some degree. Well done. This was an interesting session, with several ideas discussed. The final presenter (the “tech guy”) was not very effective. 112. Teaching and Evaluating Hand-Offs: A Competency-Based Approach Vineet M. Arora, MD Jennifer S. Myers, MD Jennifer R. Kogan, MD Subha Airan-Javia, MD Presentation Content 6.31 from 32 responses 6.30 from 33 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Session packed with useful information, involved participants in discussion. Room set-up not the best for a workshop--very crowded, no way to move into smaller groups. Helpful session, presented effectively. Interesting and impt topic. we need to be talking with students about this from day 1 Very well done. Great educators. They knew both their material and their audience. Appreciate the speakers willingness to share their toolbox with the participants. Absolutely terrific session! Excellent Very good workshop! Extremely timely and helpful - especially appreciate their willingness to share their toolkit. Assumed we all had emrs Excellent presentation. Best workshop I’ve been to yet. Outstanding - used several different methods of presenting material. 113. Where’s the Waste? Operations Improvement at the University of Michigan Lindsay J. Graham Presentation Content 5.85 from 20 responses 6.05 from 20 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Excellent and useful information. I have already used the research benchmarks per grants to evaluate my research staffing. I thought Lindsay did a much better job at this session. My only issue with the session was that the room was ridiculously cold. Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 10
Lot of material covered. I thought I may have gotten more from the last part of the presentation. Lindsay did a great job covering it all by himself. Thank you to Mr. Graham for sharing the level of detail that he did regarding specific projects and the administrative benchmarking process. This kind of tools/methods sharing is the richest gain from meeting with others from different institutions -- the nitty gritty detail and tools to take home. Speaker read from the slides - very disappointing. No matter how good a topic may be, if your delivery is poor, audience will be bored. I left early because the presentation of the material was too poor. First half of talk more helpful than last half. Great stuff, but tried to cover too much. Also, the slides were very difficult to read from the back of the room... way too many lines per slide. Rather than just talk about Univ. of Michigan’s experience, I would have liked to hear what their lessons learned were and how we can take this information back to our home institution to use. 114. Writing a Recommendation Letter…Is There a Recommended Way? Rachel Bonnema, MD Abby Lyn Spencer, MD James J. Reilly, MD Presentation Content 6.58 from 38 responses 6.55 from 38 responses Workshop Session and Individual Speaker Comments: Very helpful Great session--very helpful. It was also nice to have so many people with various levels of experience--it helped to bounce ideas off each other. The review of good and weak LOR was very helpful. The small group sessions was also helpful to see how others would approach issues. Very practical and enjoyable workshop Great session. Great content. Great discussion. Great examples. Good session. Should be repeated next year Excellent. WOuld have been even better if room wasn’t so small and so crowded. We didn’t all get copies of letters we were discussing. Very good. would only suggest that the speakers color-code the sample letters for ease of communication during the session - too many similar pieces of paper floating around Terrific session, very helpful. I thought back on it when writing all my fellowship letters! One suggestion would be to give everyone a copy of all the letters in the small groups so we could see what the content was when people were reporting back. The best workshop for me. Interesting, fun, great exchange, lots of laughs Excellent session the room was too small for the number of participants Smaller size groups would be helpful. Superb session--Abby did a terrific job, well versed in the issues and details. we’ll need more sessions on this topic, the room was crammed. Great session, interactive, great letters to review, good for all of us to come together to find some common ground Outstanding workshop. i do wish that the slides were provided ahead of time, now, 2 days after the workshop is over, the slides are still not available. Excellent, very helpful Academic Internal Medicine Week 2009 Evaluation Summary Page 11
Page 1 and 2: Memorandum To: AIM Program Planning
Page 3 and 4: AIM Program Planning Committee (Jul
Page 5 and 6: Timeline for Planning the 31st Annu
Page 7 and 8: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 30th An
Page 9 and 10: Room 409, Level Four Financial and
Page 11 and 12: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. AAIM Lunch
Page 13 and 14: Room 405, Level Four Room 301, Leve
Page 15 and 16: Room 415, Level Four 114. Writing a
Page 17 and 18: Thursday, October 22, 2009 AAIM Boa
Page 19 and 20: Saturday, October 24, 2009 6:30 a.m
Page 21 and 22: AIM Precourse for New Administrator
Page 23 and 24: Academic Internal Medicine Week 200
Page 25 and 26: Speaker from Penn was a little infl
Page 27 and 28: Speakers were good but it was a dra
Page 29 and 30: An interesting discussion. Wish tha
Page 31: poor speaker, presented a structure
Page 35 and 36: Speakers really knew their topics -
Page 37 and 38: networking. I could see how roundta
Page 39 and 40: AIM Workshop Session II Average Pre
Page 41 and 42: 301. Challenges in Implementing a W
Page 43 and 44: If we have joint meetings with APDI
Page 45 and 46: get a head count for last day lunch
Page 47 and 48: not a workshop), I only got to atte
Page 49 and 50: Use of Portfolios for monitoring mi
Page 51: AIM Program Planning Committee Meet

Background Material for December 7 Conference Call - Alliance for ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?