03.02.2014 Views

Waste not want not - States Assembly

Waste not want not - States Assembly

Waste not want not - States Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WASTE NOT, WANT NOT<br />

114<br />

2. Strategic investment measures<br />

● waste minimisation measures – including<br />

extension of home composting;<br />

● roll out kerbside recycling to the majority<br />

of households, and increase the number of<br />

bring sites and well designed civic amenity<br />

sites;<br />

● information and education campaigns to<br />

support these programmes;<br />

● better waste data; and<br />

● incentives for the take up of the wider<br />

range of technologies that exist.<br />

3. Funding and delivery<br />

● the Challenge Fund should be retained and<br />

opened up to the private sector;<br />

● the LTCS should be reformed to provide<br />

more support for the strategic waste<br />

investment measures outlined in this<br />

report;<br />

● DEFRA’s waste management function<br />

should be strengthened;<br />

● a multi-disciplinary operational task-force<br />

should be set up to help local authorities<br />

deliver;<br />

● the role of WRAP should be extended to<br />

minimising and recycling waste (focusing<br />

on organics) as well as boosting recyclate<br />

markets;<br />

● improved incentives are needed to<br />

encourage tiers of local authorities and<br />

adjacent local authorities to work together<br />

to increase efficiency and realise economies<br />

of scale;<br />

● ensure the planning system and associated<br />

guidance can deliver the new facilities that<br />

will be required;<br />

● set up a high level steering board to drive<br />

forward implementation; and<br />

● ensure that the full range of appropriate<br />

interventions are used when local<br />

authorities fail to deliver on their waste<br />

plans and targets.<br />

Key actions needed between<br />

now and 2005<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

decide the phasing of increases in the landfill<br />

tax and how tax revenues will be recycled to<br />

assist industry and local authorities move to<br />

more sustainable waste management;<br />

make decisions on an incineration tax;<br />

agree adequate resourcing of the strategy set<br />

out in this report and the allocation of<br />

reformed LTCS and other funding streams;<br />

put in place the multi-disciplinary operational<br />

task force to help local authorities deliver;<br />

expand WRAP’s role and fund its programme<br />

of reduction, re-use and recycling and the<br />

education that goes with it;<br />

expand the role of Envirowise for commercial<br />

waste;<br />

adequately resource waste management in<br />

DEFRA; and<br />

invest in the infrastructure required to deliver<br />

the SU plan.<br />

Key decision points/milestones<br />

9.2 <strong>Waste</strong> Strategy 2000 is due to be reviewed<br />

in 2005. The key decision point will be 2010. If<br />

we have made no significant progress by then,<br />

very urgent and costly action will be required to<br />

meet the EU Landfill Directive by 2020.<br />

9.3 Key milestones will be:<br />

●<br />

progress in reducing waste growth by end<br />

2006;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!