Waste not want not - States Assembly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Recommendation Benefits/Risks Action to By when Lead dept/ Others Measuring be taken organisation involved progress Chapter 6 – Economic and regulatory framework Recommendation 6: ODPM should revise the building regulations to require the allocation of space in housing developments for accessible recycling facilities. Benefits: removes problem of storage space which is a major hindrance to recycling. Risks: slight extra costs to housing. Space will be used for other purposes. Could apply to new housing developments with more than 50 houses. Allocate space within the development for recycling facilities. Housing Corporations to consider similar standards for social housing, and NHBC standards for private developments. Start now. ODPM WRAP/Housing Corporations/ Construction Industry/LAs New dwellings and estates have suitable storage and space for recycling facilities. SUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN 119
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Recommendation Benefits/Risks Action to By when Lead dept/ Others Measuring be taken organisation involved progress Chapter 6 – Economic and regulatory framework Recommendation 7: OGC and other Departments to finalise central government targets for the use of recycled materials. All Departments to also have in place a trained Green Procurement Officer. (w) Benefits: expansion of markets for recyclates. Government departments meet targets. Risks: slight increase in costs until recyclate falls in price, unless good economies of scale in purchase obtained. OGC and other Departments to work through SPG (taking advice from WRAP) to set targets for purchasing goods with minimum recycled content. Recommend training for green procurement officers. Consider waste minimisation targets for office waste in the medium term. Start now. <strong>Waste</strong> min targets by 2006/7 OGC, SPG. WRAP, other government departments More green goods procured by 2006/7. Higher percentages of waste recycled. 120
Page 1 and 2:
Waste not, Want not A strategy for
Page 3 and 4:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 2
Page 5 and 6:
The report shows clearly that a dif
Page 7 and 8:
Key points (continued) The aim of p
Page 9 and 10:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 8 There are sev
Page 11 and 12:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 10 The second p
Page 13 and 14:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 12 that cause e
Page 15 and 16:
● 50% of households carrying out
Page 17 and 18:
Box 1: Tackling waste in the devolv
Page 19 and 20:
● Chapter 3 describes why tacklin
Page 21 and 22:
Box 2: Types of waste: (continued)
Page 23 and 24:
authority makes arrangements to rec
Page 25 and 26:
Box 3: Instruments used in other co
Page 27 and 28:
There are sound economic and enviro
Page 29 and 30:
Current policies are failing to tac
Page 31 and 32:
● setting up the Waste and Resour
Page 33 and 34:
4. BARRIERS TO MORE SUSTAINABLE WAS
Page 35 and 36:
4.7 As well as DTI and DEFRA, the E
Page 37 and 38:
that only 7% of the public identify
Page 39 and 40:
Box 6: Common waste ‘myths’…
Page 41 and 42:
● time series data on the costs o
Page 43 and 44:
Summary (continued) ● funding for
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7: A more detailed version o
Page 47 and 48:
Box 8: Roles and Responsibilities (
Page 49 and 50:
Having set out the principles and t
Page 51 and 52:
● ● ● options open and reduce
Page 53 and 54:
● ● ● ● reducing the rate o
Page 55 and 56:
Box 11: Scenario 1 - Do nothing - h
Page 57 and 58:
Box 13: Scenario 3 - Doing even bet
Page 59 and 60:
Reform of the economic and regulato
Page 61 and 62:
Box 15: An example of incentives to
Page 63 and 64:
Box 17: Measures to tackle fly-tipp
Page 65 and 66:
Box 18: The UK Producer Responsibil
Page 67 and 68:
Option (a): developing markets for
Page 69 and 70: Building regulations 6.26 One of th
Page 71 and 72: minimisation targets for office was
Page 73 and 74: Recommendation 9: DEFRA together wi
Page 75 and 76: Figure 12: Landfill tax rates and p
Page 77 and 78: 6.53 Lessons from the introduction
Page 79 and 80: management strategy in reducing was
Page 81 and 82: Box 26: Department of Health eviden
Page 83 and 84: 7. CHAPTER STRATEGIC HEADINGS INVES
Page 85 and 86: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 14: Four
Page 87 and 88: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 14: Four
Page 89 and 90: What could a reduction in waste gro
Page 91 and 92: Box 27: current collection infrastr
Page 93 and 94: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 17: Two
Page 95 and 96: Industry: what’s needed? 7.19 Sin
Page 97 and 98: Priority 4: improving the research
Page 99 and 100: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 18: Summ
Page 101 and 102: 8. Funding and Delivery Summary Spe
Page 103 and 104: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 102 Pressures f
Page 105 and 106: scheme to tackle priority areas for
Page 107 and 108: Figure 19: A new framework for the
Page 109 and 110: will be required and then translate
Page 111 and 112: Recommendation 31: DEFRA and ODPM s
Page 113 and 114: Recommendation 34: ODPM and DEFRA s
Page 115 and 116: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 114 2. Strategi
Page 117 and 118: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Summary of key
Page 119: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Recommendation
Page 123 and 124: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Recommendation
Page 141 and 142: ANNEX A. THE ROLE OF THE STRATEGY U
Page 143 and 144: Lester Hicks - ODPM, senior officia
Page 145 and 146: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT The conclusions
Page 147 and 148: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 146 3. Commerci
Page 149 and 150: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Annex C: Summar
Page 151 and 152: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Annex C: Summar
Page 153 and 154: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 152 Community s
Page 155 and 156: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 154 Licensed si
Page 157 and 158: Waste Strategy 2000 - Government vi
show all

Waste not want not - States Assembly

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?