Waste not want not - States Assembly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 17: Two Investment Measures to Expand Recycling and Composting Measure Aims Rationale Estimated Cost Benefit/impact 1. Advice to local authorities on the implementation and improvement of kerbside collection, particularly for organic waste, through a Kerbside Taskforce (KTF) service to local authorities. ● To give direct advice to local authorities; ● to deliver training to recycling/composting managers. ● WRAP is currently piloting a national training programme for recycling managers as part of the Quality Sourcing Initiative. Even at this early stage, it is clear that there is a strong demand from local authorities for more intensive expert advice and support to assist them in devising and implementing successful kerbside collection programmes. ● The role of the KTF is advisory but it would work alongside the rollout of the Challenge Fund and other government initiatives. £7 million over 3 years. ● The KTF would be available to local authorities for up to 30 person days/year on an application basis. ● Criteria would be developed for provision of support, based on local authority need, current performance, likely resources available to them and potential tonnages recycled/composted to secure maximum leverage in raising recycling/composting rates. STRATEGIC INVESTMENT MEASURES 91
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 17: Two Investment Measures to Expand Recycling and Composting (continued) Measure Aims Rationale Estimated Cost Benefit/impact 2. Expansion of markets – priority on organics WRAP has developed an outline Organics Material Programme, key elements of which are: ● capital competition for investment support for additional, large scale primary processing capacity; ● Business Development initiative for smaller-scale emerging composting businesses; ● continued development of Compost Standards to underpin expansion of end-markets for composted products; ● marketing and product development activities with the landscaping and horticultural sectors. ● To double the market share of compost into landscaping and horticultural markets by 2006; ● increase by 17% the utilisation of compost in agriculture; ● 30 new business startups in composting. ● A broad cross-section of WRAP stakeholders have repeatedly argued for a specific programme to address organics issues. ● Organic collection systems and the link with home composting will be a vital component in reducing biodegradable material sent to landfill. ● There would be a strong link to best practice activity in collection – the Kerbside Taskforce (see above). £36 million over 3 years. ● 1 million tonnes per annum additional compost produced from local authority organics collections. 92
Page 1 and 2:
Waste not, Want not A strategy for
Page 3 and 4:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 2
Page 5 and 6:
The report shows clearly that a dif
Page 7 and 8:
Key points (continued) The aim of p
Page 9 and 10:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 8 There are sev
Page 11 and 12:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 10 The second p
Page 13 and 14:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 12 that cause e
Page 15 and 16:
● 50% of households carrying out
Page 17 and 18:
Box 1: Tackling waste in the devolv
Page 19 and 20:
● Chapter 3 describes why tacklin
Page 21 and 22:
Box 2: Types of waste: (continued)
Page 23 and 24:
authority makes arrangements to rec
Page 25 and 26:
Box 3: Instruments used in other co
Page 27 and 28:
There are sound economic and enviro
Page 29 and 30:
Current policies are failing to tac
Page 31 and 32:
● setting up the Waste and Resour
Page 33 and 34:
4. BARRIERS TO MORE SUSTAINABLE WAS
Page 35 and 36:
4.7 As well as DTI and DEFRA, the E
Page 37 and 38:
that only 7% of the public identify
Page 39 and 40:
Box 6: Common waste ‘myths’…
Page 41 and 42: ● time series data on the costs o
Page 43 and 44: Summary (continued) ● funding for
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7: A more detailed version o
Page 47 and 48: Box 8: Roles and Responsibilities (
Page 49 and 50: Having set out the principles and t
Page 51 and 52: ● ● ● options open and reduce
Page 53 and 54: ● ● ● ● reducing the rate o
Page 55 and 56: Box 11: Scenario 1 - Do nothing - h
Page 57 and 58: Box 13: Scenario 3 - Doing even bet
Page 59 and 60: Reform of the economic and regulato
Page 61 and 62: Box 15: An example of incentives to
Page 63 and 64: Box 17: Measures to tackle fly-tipp
Page 65 and 66: Box 18: The UK Producer Responsibil
Page 67 and 68: Option (a): developing markets for
Page 69 and 70: Building regulations 6.26 One of th
Page 71 and 72: minimisation targets for office was
Page 73 and 74: Recommendation 9: DEFRA together wi
Page 75 and 76: Figure 12: Landfill tax rates and p
Page 77 and 78: 6.53 Lessons from the introduction
Page 79 and 80: management strategy in reducing was
Page 81 and 82: Box 26: Department of Health eviden
Page 83 and 84: 7. CHAPTER STRATEGIC HEADINGS INVES
Page 85 and 86: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 14: Four
Page 87 and 88: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 14: Four
Page 89 and 90: What could a reduction in waste gro
Page 91: Box 27: current collection infrastr
Page 95 and 96: Industry: what’s needed? 7.19 Sin
Page 97 and 98: Priority 4: improving the research
Page 99 and 100: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Figure 18: Summ
Page 101 and 102: 8. Funding and Delivery Summary Spe
Page 103 and 104: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 102 Pressures f
Page 105 and 106: scheme to tackle priority areas for
Page 107 and 108: Figure 19: A new framework for the
Page 109 and 110: will be required and then translate
Page 111 and 112: Recommendation 31: DEFRA and ODPM s
Page 113 and 114: Recommendation 34: ODPM and DEFRA s
Page 115 and 116: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 114 2. Strategi
Page 117 and 118: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Summary of key
Page 119 and 120: WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Recommendation
Page 141 and 142: ANNEX A. THE ROLE OF THE STRATEGY U
Page 143 and 144:
Lester Hicks - ODPM, senior officia
Page 145 and 146:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT The conclusions
Page 147 and 148:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 146 3. Commerci
Page 149 and 150:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Annex C: Summar
Page 151 and 152:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT Annex C: Summar
Page 153 and 154:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 152 Community s
Page 155 and 156:
WASTE NOT, WANT NOT 154 Licensed si
Page 157 and 158:
Waste Strategy 2000 - Government vi
show all

Waste not want not - States Assembly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?