Waste not want not - States Assembly
Waste not want not - States Assembly
Waste not want not - States Assembly
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Recommendation Benefits/Risks Action to By when Lead dept/ Others Measuring<br />
be taken organisation involved progress<br />
Chapter 6 – Economic<br />
and regulatory<br />
framework<br />
Recommendation 14:<br />
The case for an<br />
incineration tax should<br />
be kept under review.<br />
(w)*<br />
Benefits: would send a<br />
clear signal about the<br />
intention to focus on<br />
reduction and recycling.<br />
More information<br />
needed to make the case.<br />
HMT to conduct<br />
more work.<br />
Now –<br />
decisions<br />
by 2004<br />
HMT<br />
Recommendation 15:<br />
An independent body<br />
should bring together<br />
the literature and<br />
evidence on the<br />
relative health and<br />
environmental effects<br />
of all different waste<br />
management options,<br />
relative to each other<br />
and to other activities<br />
affecting health and<br />
the environment.<br />
(w)<br />
Benefits: an<br />
independent body could<br />
bring together current<br />
best research for the use<br />
of local authorities and<br />
to provide a definitive<br />
and objective line on<br />
effects.<br />
Risks: does <strong>not</strong> resolve<br />
debate on health effects<br />
or address perceptions of<br />
risk. Leads to a freeze in<br />
development of all<br />
facilities whilst study is<br />
undertaken.<br />
DEFRA to identify<br />
a suitable<br />
independent<br />
body, perhaps the<br />
Royal Society.<br />
Now.<br />
Review<br />
completed<br />
by Summer<br />
2003.<br />
DEFRA<br />
EA<br />
Definitive and<br />
objective review of<br />
current knowledge<br />
available to all.<br />
Helps LAs to<br />
understand pros and<br />
cons, communicate<br />
risks to households.<br />
SUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN<br />
127