03.02.2014 Views

Waste not want not - States Assembly

Waste not want not - States Assembly

Waste not want not - States Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

●<br />

●<br />

the costs of waste management and disposal<br />

should be fully internalised in the costs of all<br />

goods and services; and<br />

the waste management options that secure<br />

the greatest environmental benefit should be<br />

pursued, provided they are soundly based in<br />

cost-benefit terms.<br />

from waste by recycling it, composting or<br />

recovering energy (i.e. through incineration)<br />

and, finally, the option at the bottom of<br />

the hierarchy is to dispose of waste e.g.<br />

through landfill.<br />

Figure 6: the waste hierarchy 63<br />

The achievement of these<br />

goals should be guided by<br />

sound principles<br />

5.5 If these goals are to be achieved they will<br />

need to draw on a set of guiding principles. The<br />

three important ones for waste are:<br />

Reduce<br />

Re-use<br />

●<br />

●<br />

using the waste hierarchy as a guide to<br />

environmental benefits and applying the<br />

BPEO to make decisions;<br />

setting out a clear framework of roles and<br />

responsibilities; and<br />

Recover<br />

Disposal<br />

●<br />

keeping options open.<br />

Using the waste hierarchy and<br />

the BPEO to achieve higher<br />

rates of waste reduction, reuse<br />

and recycling<br />

5.6 The waste hierarchy is a useful framework<br />

that has become a cornerstone of sustainable<br />

waste management, setting out the order in<br />

which options for waste management should be<br />

considered based on environmental impact.<br />

Following the hierarchy (see Figure 6) the best<br />

option for the environment is to generate less<br />

waste. The second best option is to re-use<br />

products and materials, thirdly to recover value<br />

63<br />

As set out in the EC <strong>Waste</strong> Framework Directive<br />

64<br />

See for example, consultation responses to A Way With <strong>Waste</strong> op. cit<br />

5.7 The merits or otherwise of the waste<br />

hierarchy have been widely debated. The main<br />

criticisms are that:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

it is too simplistic a tool to use; 64 and<br />

it does <strong>not</strong> explicitly incorporate a costbenefit<br />

dimension for reaching judgements<br />

about the preferred point within the<br />

hierarchy.<br />

5.8 To answer the first of these, more<br />

sophisticated variants of the hierarchy, (as<br />

shown for example in Figure 7) have been<br />

developed which set out the range of waste<br />

management options more comprehensively.<br />

MOVING FORWARDS TO A NEW STRATEGY<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!