Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...
Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...
Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WISHful Thinking?<br />
By Rob Cooling - Head <strong>of</strong> Health and Safety Training and Consultancy<br />
Services at East Coast Occupational Safety and Health (ECOSH), a<br />
commercial subsidiary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Grimsby</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> Further and Higher<br />
Education.<br />
As the current legal framework fails to<br />
support effective worker involvement, this<br />
paper questions whether organisations<br />
should consider adopting a systems<br />
approach to managing Worker Involvement<br />
in Safety and Health (WISH).<br />
In February 2004 the Health and Safety<br />
Commission (HSC) published a visionary<br />
strategy for workplace health and safety in<br />
Great Britain to 2010 and beyond. In this<br />
strategy the HSC described its mission is to<br />
“gain the recognition <strong>of</strong> health and safety as<br />
a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> civilised society and with<br />
that achieve a record <strong>of</strong> workplace health<br />
and safety that leads the world”. Worker<br />
involvement was presented as a<br />
fundamental success factor in striving<br />
towards this vision.<br />
The rhetoric on worker involvement is<br />
nothing new, the phrase that health and<br />
safety should be ‘everybody’s business’ has<br />
been around a long time, yet the idealistic<br />
shouts <strong>of</strong> ‘empowerment’ and ‘selfmanagement’<br />
remain heady aspirations.<br />
Even though we live in a society which<br />
outwardly promotes industrial democracy,<br />
very few organisations have taken the steps<br />
necessary to embrace worker involvement<br />
in safety and health (WISH). Most<br />
organisations continue to artificially<br />
subscribe to the weakest forms <strong>of</strong> worker<br />
involvement, <strong>of</strong>ten to meet legal<br />
requirements, with the underlying proviso<br />
that these changes do not markedly shift the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> power within the organisation.<br />
Yet why is this the case? Why is it only the<br />
most enlightened organisations that have<br />
FOCUS Page Page 39