07.02.2014 Views

Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...

Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...

Journal of Research & Scholarly Output 2006 - Grimsby Institute of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The intention <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate<br />

the reasons contributing to the<br />

contemporary bias against sequential art in<br />

the United Kingdom. Whilst further events<br />

during the twentieth century reinforced and<br />

amplified this bias up to the present day, the<br />

conclusion is that attitudes to image-based<br />

narrative were significantly altered during<br />

the events <strong>of</strong> the Reformation, and<br />

confusion regarding the nature <strong>of</strong> sequential<br />

art’s purpose and usage was generated by<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> the political cartoon<br />

during the Eighteenth Century. Increasingly,<br />

media and literary critics are vocalising their<br />

conclusions that sequential art deserves the<br />

same respect as other written media (16), be<br />

it prose, scriptwriting or poetry, but the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> the historical events that<br />

changed cultural attitudes towards imagebased<br />

storytelling in this country were <strong>of</strong><br />

such a scale that their effects are felt even<br />

today. The irony is that, at some stage,<br />

everyone in this country relies upon a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> text and imagery presented<br />

in a sequential manner when learning to<br />

read - but perhaps this in itself is a further<br />

significant reason why the British continue<br />

to believe that ‘comics are for kids’.<br />

FOCUS Page Page 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!