Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Recommendations

Info

114 Bibliography Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/art82/guidance. pdf J Häckner (1999), ‘Market Delineation and Product Differentiation,’ http://wwwnesuse/paper/wp99_07pdf J Hausman, ‘A Proposed Method for Analysing Competition among Differentiated Products’ [1992] Antitrust Law Journal 60, 889–900. B Hawk, ‘The American (Anti-Trust) Revolution: Lessons for the EEC?’ [1988] ECLR 53. Hinchliffe, ‘When Is an Agreement Not an Agreement?’ [2004] 5/6 Business Law Review 108. H Hotelling, ‘Stability in Competition’ (1929) Economic Journal, 39, 41–57. KN Hylton & M Salinger, Tying Law and Policy: A Decision—Theoretic Approach [2001] 69 Antitrust Law Journal 469. E Iacobucci, ‘Tying as Quality Control: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No 01-09, http://papersssrncom/abstract=293602. ICN Unilateral Conduct Working Group for the 6 th Annual Conference of the ICN in May 2007 in Moscow http://wwwinternationalcompetitionnetworkorg/media/library/unilateral_conduct/Objectives%20of%20Unil ateral%20Conduct%20May%2007pdf ICN Special Program for Kyoto Annual Conference Report on Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position, wwwinternationalcompetitionnetworkorg International Competition Network (Seventh Annual Conference), Special Program on Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position, Germany response http://wwwicn-kyotoorg/documents/germanypdf Immenga and Mestmäcker — Markert, Kommentar zum GWB, 1st edition 1981 A Irmen, JF Thisse, ‘Competition in Multi-characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right’ [1998] Journal of Economic Theory, 76–102. A Jones and B Sufrin, ‘EC Competition Law’ (2 nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2004). A Jones, ‘A Dominant Firm’s Duty to Deal: EC and US Antitrust Law Compared’ in Handbook of Research in Transatlantic Antitrust (Philip Marsden (ed), (British Institute of International and Comparative Law) 2006). I Kokkoris, ‘Antitrust Encyclopedia’, French Report by Christophe Clarenc, wwwconcurrencescom I Kokkoris, ‘The Development of the concept of Collective Dominance in the European Community Merger Regulation From its Inception to its Current Status’ [2007] World Competition, September.
Bibliography 115 I Kokkoris, Competition Cases from the European Union (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2007). S Kon, S Turnbull, ‘Pricing and the dominant firm: implications of the Competition Commission Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in the Napp case’ [2007] 24(2) ECLR 70–86. V Korah, An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice (5 th edn, OUP, 1994). N Kroes, ‘Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82’ speech given on 23 September 2005 at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute New York http://europaeu/rapid/pressReleasesActiondo?reference= SPEECH/05/537&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLangua ge=en N Kroes, ‘European Competition Policy: Delivering Better Markets and Better Choices’, 15 September 2005, available at http://europaeu/rapid/ pressReleasesActiondo?reference=SPEECH/05/512&format=HTML& aged=0& language=EN&guiLanguage=en K-U Kühn, R Stillman, C Caffarra (2005) ‘Economic theories of bundling and their policy implications in abuse cases: an assessment in light of the Microsoft case’ [2005] 1(1) Euro CJ 85–121. K-U Kühn, R Stillman, C Caffarra, Economic Theories of Bundling and Their Policy Implication in Abuse Cases: An Assessment in Light of the Microsoft Case, CEPR Discussion Paper No 4756 (2005). T Lampert, Evaluating Bundled Discounts, 89 Minn L Rev 1688 (2004–2005) JT Lang, ‘Defining Legitimate Competition: Companies’ Duties to Supply Competitors and Access to Essential Facilities’ [1994] 18 Fordham International Law Journal 437. JT Lang, ‘Defining Legitimate Competition: How to Clarify Pricing Abuses Under Article 82’ [2002] FILJ 83. JT Lang and R O’Donoghue, ‘Defining Legitimate Competition: How to Clarify Pricing Abuses under Article 82EC’ [2002] 26 Fordham International Law Journal 83. JT Lang, ‘European Competition Law and Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property Rights—a Comprehensive Principle’ [2004] 4 Europarättslig Tidskrift 558–588. JT Lang, ‘Fundamental Issues Concerning Abuse Under Article 82 EC’ [2005] Regulatory Policy Institute 19. M Lao, ‘Aspen Skiing and Trinko: Antitrust Intent and Sacrifice’ [2005] 73 Antitrust Law Journal 171. Law on Competition of 17 May 2004 (the ‘2004 Law’) http://wwwlegiluxpubliclu/leg/a/archives/2004/0762605/0762605pdf?SID=9c660fa1e8e54 46d8be91743b21d36cb#page=2 T Leary, ‘The search for Consensus on the Revival of Section 5’, FTC Workshop on Section 5, 17 October 2008, www.ftc.gov
Page 1 and 2:
Introduction The Treaty of Rome 195
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction 3 tion of this concept
Page 5 and 6:
CHAPTER 1 Objectives of Article 82
Page 7 and 8:
Objectives of Article 82 7 economic
Page 9 and 10:
Objectives of Article 82 9 Director
Page 11 and 12:
Objectives of Article 82 11 Virtual
Page 13 and 14:
Objectives of Article 82 13 product
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 2 Concept of Dominance The
Page 17 and 18:
Concept of Dominance 17 The stateme
Page 19 and 20:
Concept of Dominance 19 criticisms
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 3 Abuse of Superior Bargain
Page 23 and 24:
Abuse of Superior Bargaining Positi
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 4 The Gap in the Applicatio
Page 45 and 46:
The Gap in the Application of Artic
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
from the legal norm itself. Article
Page 63 and 64: In this book we are focusing on the
Page 65 and 66: The Gap in the Application of Artic
Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 5 How to Rectify the Gap Ge
Page 81 and 82: How to Rectify the Gap 81 As Faull
Page 83 and 84: How to Rectify the Gap 83 of the co
Page 85 and 86: How to Rectify the Gap 85 An argume
Page 87 and 88: How to Rectify the Gap 87 departing
Page 89 and 90: How to Rectify the Gap 89 mentioned
Page 91 and 92: How to Rectify the Gap 91 proportio
Page 93 and 94: How to Rectify the Gap 93 Depending
Page 95: How to Rectify the Gap 95 cases is
Page 98 and 99: 98 A Gap in the Enforcement of Arti
Page 100 and 101: 100 A Gap in the Enforcement of Art
Page 102 and 103: 102 A Gap in the Enforcement of Art
Page 105 and 106: Annex 1 REPORT PREPARED BY THE ICN
Page 107 and 108: Annex 2 REPORT PREPARED BY THE ICN
Page 109: Annex 4 Appendix C of the ICN Kyoto
Page 112 and 113: 112 Bibliography P Callol, P Pignat
Page 116 and 117: 116 Bibliography J Leibowitz, ‘Ta
Page 118 and 119: 118 Bibliography I Roudard (1989),
Page 120: 120 Bibliography The Distillers Com
show all

Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?