Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...
Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...
Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72 A Gap in the En<strong>for</strong>cement <strong>of</strong> Article 82<br />
Section 131(2) <strong>of</strong> the Act states that, <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> a market investigation<br />
reference, a feature <strong>of</strong> a market in the United Kingdom shall be<br />
construed as:<br />
(a) the structure <strong>of</strong> the market concerned or any aspect <strong>of</strong> that structure;<br />
(b) any conduct (whether or not in the market concerned) <strong>of</strong> one or more<br />
than one person who, supplies or acquires goods or services in the<br />
market concerned; or<br />
(c) any conduct relating to the market concerned <strong>of</strong> customers <strong>of</strong> any<br />
person who supplies or acquires goods or services.<br />
Conduct includes any failure to act, whether intentional or not and any<br />
other unintentional conduct. <strong>The</strong> CC will have regard to any conduct <strong>of</strong> the<br />
firms in a market (whether sellers or buyers) that could, in the circumstances<br />
<strong>of</strong> the particular market, have an adverse effect on competition<br />
(whether in the market in which the firms themselves are engaged or in<br />
some other market, <strong>for</strong> example, the market <strong>of</strong> the sellers’ suppliers or<br />
customers). <strong>The</strong> Competition Commission may require remedial measures<br />
as it considers reasonable and practicable to mitigate or prevent the adverse<br />
effect on competition or any detrimental effects on customers. 77<br />
A firm may have market power, and the capacity to act in ways that may<br />
prevent, restrict or distort competition, with a market share below that<br />
usually regarded as necessary to suggest dominance <strong>for</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
CA98. For example, the Competition Commission may assess the effects on<br />
competition <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> discounts and rebates. In many cases,<br />
discounts and rebates are normal components <strong>of</strong> the competitive process<br />
and will, in general, not be a cause <strong>for</strong> concern. However, where a firm has<br />
market power then the CC will consider whether any discounts or rebates<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered might have adverse effects on competition. Thus, the CC approach<br />
towards discounts and rebates encompasses the assessment <strong>of</strong> such conduct<br />
by firms having market power and which are not necessarily dominant. <strong>The</strong><br />
Commission cannot address conduct involving discounts or rebates unless<br />
the undertaking is dominant, curtailing thus its ability to capture anticompetitive<br />
conduct by non-dominant firms.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ability to adopt anti-competitive conduct will depend upon the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the constraints exerted by its competitors or its customers.<br />
Where there is no abuse <strong>of</strong> a dominant position but structural features <strong>of</strong><br />
the market nevertheless appear to affect the competitive process adversely,<br />
then a market investigation reference will be a possibility. Thus, adverse<br />
effects on competition induced by conduct that does not involve either<br />
77 Market Investigation References: Competition Commission Guidelines, www.<br />
competition-commission.org.uk.