29.10.2012 Views

Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 Bibliography<br />

I Roudard (1989), ‘<strong>The</strong> New French Legislation on Competition’ [1989]<br />

ECLR 10(2) 205–232.<br />

E Rousseva, ‘<strong>The</strong> Concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Objective Justification’ <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Abuse</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Dominant Position: Can it help to Modernise the Analysis under Article<br />

82 EC?’ [2005] 2(2) Comp L Rev.<br />

M Salinger, ‘A Graphical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Bundling’ [1995] 68 J Bus 85 .<br />

R Schmalensee, ‘Output and Welfare Implications <strong>of</strong> Monopolistic Third-<br />

Degree Price Discrimination’ [1981] 71 <strong>The</strong> American <strong>Economic</strong> Review<br />

242<br />

R Schmalensee, Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling, [1984] 57 J<br />

Bus 211.<br />

M Schödermeier, Metro II et les limites de la distribution sélective (Cahiers<br />

de droit européen, 1987).<br />

M Schödermeier, ‘Collective dominance revisited: an analysis <strong>of</strong> the EC<br />

Commission’s new concepts <strong>of</strong> oligopoly control’ [1990] 11(1) ECLR,<br />

11(1) 28–34.<br />

D Seidmann, ‘Bundling as a Facilitating Device: A Reinterpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

Leverage <strong>The</strong>ory [1991] 58 <strong>Economic</strong>a 491.<br />

A Shaked, J Sutton, ‘Relaxing Price Competition through Product<br />

Differentiation’ [1982] Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Studies 49.<br />

C Shapiro, ‘Mergers with Differentiated Products’ [1996] Antitrust 10.<br />

J Shaw, ‘Inter versus intra brand competition: dominant positions and ancillary<br />

markets’ [1987] E L Rev 12(3) 195–199.<br />

N Singh and X Vives, ‘Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated<br />

Duopoly’ [1984] Rand Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>s 15, 546–554.<br />

M Sousa Ferro (2007) ‘Reassessing Borders Between Agreements and<br />

Unilateral Practices after Case C-74/04’, Volkswagen II’ [2007] 28(3)<br />

ECLR 205–209.<br />

D Spector, ‘From harm to competitors to harm to competition: one more<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t, please!’ [2006] 2(1) Euro CJ 145–162.<br />

C Stothers, ‘Refusal to Supply as <strong>Abuse</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Dominant Position: Essential<br />

Facilities in the <strong>European</strong> Union’ [2001] 7 ECLR.<br />

C Stothers, ‘Who Needs Intellectual Property? Competition Law and<br />

Restrictions on Parallel Trade Within the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Area’<br />

[2005] 27 (12) EIPR 458–466.<br />

A Stratakis, ‘Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the US and EU Approach and<br />

En<strong>for</strong>ecement <strong>of</strong> the Essential Facilities Doctrine’ [2006] 27 ECLR 434.<br />

J Tirole, <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Industrial Organization (Cambridge, Mass, <strong>The</strong><br />

MIT Press, 1988).<br />

J Tirole, ‘<strong>The</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Tying Cases: A Primer’ [2005] 1 Comp <strong>Policy</strong> Int’l<br />

1.<br />

G Triantafillakis in I Kokkoris, Competition Cases from the <strong>European</strong><br />

Union (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2007).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!