Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Recommendations

Info

116 Bibliography J Leibowitz, ‘Tales from the Crypt’, FTC Workshop on Section 5, 17 October 2008, www.ftc.gov. A Lindsay The EC Merger Regulation: Substantive Issues (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2003). M Lorenz, M Lübbig and A Russel, ‘Price Discrimination, a Tender Story’ [2005] ECLR 355. L Luce Nollet, Y Utzschneider, ‘France: Award of radio frequency licences not subject to jurisdiction of competition authority’ [2002] 23(2) ECLR N26–27, France Telecom SA v Numericable SNC [2001] ECC 2. MC Lucey (2006), ‘Unforeseen consequences of Article 3 of EU Regulation 1/2003’ [2006] 27(10) (ECLR) 558–563. A Majumdar, ‘The Role of A Consumer Harm Test in Competition Policy’, Draft for Discussion (2007), http://64233169104/search?q=cache:7X1 vk0Kcns4J: wwwlucedu/law/academics/special/center/antitrust/pdfs/ consumer_harmpdf+differentiated+products+markets+in+competition+ policy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=90&gl=us J Malinauskaite, ‘The development of “consumer welfare and its application in the competition law of the European Community and Lithuania’ [2007] 18(10) ICCLR 354–364. Market investigation references Guidance about the making of references under Part 4 of the Enterprise Act wwwoftgovuk Market Investigation References: Competition Commission Guidelines, wwwcompetition-commissionorguk Jedlickova B McCabe, ‘Boundaries between unilateral and multilateral conducts in vertical restraints’ [2008] 29(10) ECLR 600–607. RP McAfee, J McMillan and MD Whinston, Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity bundling and correlation of values [1989] 104 Q J Econ 371. V Mertikopoulou, ‘DG Competition’s discussion paper on the application of Article 82 of the EC Treaty to exclusionary abuses: the proposed economic reform from a legal point of view’ [2007] 28(4) ECLR 241–251. Michael Salinger at the FTC Workshop on Section 5, 17 October 2008, www.ftc.gov. G Monti, ‘The Concept of Dominance in Article 82’ [2006] European Competition Journal 31–52. M Motta (2007), Competition Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2007) M Mussa, S Rosen, ‘Monopoly and Product Quality’, [1978] 18 Journal of Economic Theory 301–317. P Muysert, ‘Price Discrimination—An Unreliable Indicator of Market Power’ [2004] 6 ECLR 350. Nalebuff, Bundling, Tying and Portfolio Effects, DTI Economics Paper No1, February 2003. C Nagy, ‘Refusal to deal and the doctrine of essential facilities in US and EC
Bibliography 117 competition law: a comparative perspective and a proposal for a workable analytical framework’ [2007] 32(5) EL Rev 664–685. E Navarro Varona, ‘Amendments to the Spanish Law for the Defence of Competition’ [2000] 21(4) ECLR 235–238. A Nevo, ‘Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of Ready-to-Eat Cereal’, Competition Policy Center Book CPC99-002 (1997) http://repositoriescdliborg/iber/cpc/CPC99-002 G Niels, H Jenkins, Reform of Article 82: Where the Link Between Dominance and Effects Breaks Down [2005] ECLR. L Nollet, ‘France: Anti-competitive Practices’ [2003] 24(7) ECLR N116–117. R O’Donoghue and J PadillaJ, The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC (OUP, Oxford, 2006); OECD ‘The Essential Facilities Concept’ Background Note, OCDE/GD(96)113. OECD, ‘Competition Policy Roundtable on Loyalty and Fidelity Discounts and Rebates’ (4 March 2003) 1–239. OECD, ‘Competition Policy Roundtable on Predatory Foreclosure’ (15 March 2005) 1–279. P Oliver, ‘The Concept of “Abuse” of a Dominant Position under Article 82 EC: Recent Developments in Relation to Pricing’ [2006] 1(2) Euro CJ 315–339. OECD brief, ‘Substantial Market Power’ http://wwwoecdorg/dataoecd/58/ 28/41257462pdf September 2008. A Perrot, ‘Towards an Effects-based Approach of Price Discrimination’ in The Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination (Swedish Competition Authority, 2005). D Price, ‘Abuse of a dominant position—the tale of nails, milk cartons and TV guides’ [1990] 11(2) ECLR 80–90. Report by the EAGCP—‘An Economic Approach to Article 82’ http:// eceuropaeu/comm/competition/antitrust/art82/indexhtml D Ridyard, ‘Exclusionary Pricing and Price Discrimination Abuses under Article 82—An Economic Analysis’ [2002] 6 ECLR 286. D Ridyard, ‘Tying and Bundling—Cause for Complaint?’ [2005] 26(6) ECLR 316–319. G Robinson, ‘On Refusing to Deal with Rivals’ [2002] 87 Cornell Law Review 1177. L Röller, ‘Exploitative Abuses’, in Ehlermann and Marquis (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2008). T Rosch, Welcoming Remarks, FTC Workshop on Section 5, 17 October 2008, www.ftc.gov. P Roth (2001), ‘Bellamy and Child European Community Law of Competition’ (5 th edn, Sweet and Maxwell, London).
Page 1 and 2:
Introduction The Treaty of Rome 195
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction 3 tion of this concept
Page 5 and 6:
CHAPTER 1 Objectives of Article 82
Page 7 and 8:
Objectives of Article 82 7 economic
Page 9 and 10:
Objectives of Article 82 9 Director
Page 11 and 12:
Objectives of Article 82 11 Virtual
Page 13 and 14:
Objectives of Article 82 13 product
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 2 Concept of Dominance The
Page 17 and 18:
Concept of Dominance 17 The stateme
Page 19 and 20:
Concept of Dominance 19 criticisms
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 3 Abuse of Superior Bargain
Page 23 and 24:
Abuse of Superior Bargaining Positi
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 4 The Gap in the Applicatio
Page 45 and 46:
The Gap in the Application of Artic
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
from the legal norm itself. Article
Page 63 and 64:
In this book we are focusing on the
Page 65 and 66: The Gap in the Application of Artic
Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 5 How to Rectify the Gap Ge
Page 81 and 82: How to Rectify the Gap 81 As Faull
Page 83 and 84: How to Rectify the Gap 83 of the co
Page 85 and 86: How to Rectify the Gap 85 An argume
Page 87 and 88: How to Rectify the Gap 87 departing
Page 89 and 90: How to Rectify the Gap 89 mentioned
Page 91 and 92: How to Rectify the Gap 91 proportio
Page 93 and 94: How to Rectify the Gap 93 Depending
Page 95: How to Rectify the Gap 95 cases is
Page 98 and 99: 98 A Gap in the Enforcement of Arti
Page 100 and 101: 100 A Gap in the Enforcement of Art
Page 102 and 103: 102 A Gap in the Enforcement of Art
Page 105 and 106: Annex 1 REPORT PREPARED BY THE ICN
Page 107 and 108: Annex 2 REPORT PREPARED BY THE ICN
Page 109: Annex 4 Appendix C of the ICN Kyoto
Page 112 and 113: 112 Bibliography P Callol, P Pignat
Page 114 and 115: 114 Bibliography Guidance on the Co
Page 118 and 119: 118 Bibliography I Roudard (1989),
Page 120: 120 Bibliography The Distillers Com
show all

Abuse of Economic Dependence - The Centre for European Policy ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?