CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...
CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...
CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Culture, Diversity and Equity Project: <strong>Literature</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />
• A culturally diverse staff that reflects the community(ies) served;<br />
• Providers or translators who speak the clients’ language(s);<br />
• Training for providers about the culture and language of the people they serve;<br />
• Signage and instructional literature in the clients’ language(s) and consistent with their cultural norms; and<br />
• Culturally specific healthcare settings.<br />
More locally, in the context of the LHINs, the GTA Diversity and LHINs Working Group contend:<br />
• A local health integration network (LHIN) that is culturally competent establishes diversity as a corporate<br />
strategic priority; reflects the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion in its organizational culture; mirrors<br />
the community’s diversity in its governance and staffing; and cultivates inclusive relationships with<br />
communities.<br />
• Indicators of success for a diverse and culturally competent LHIN include commitment from the top, clarity on<br />
what needs to be changed; process internally managed, knowledge-based, and supported by training;<br />
commitment reflected in policies and procedures; goals action-oriented and measurable; resources targeted; and<br />
built-in accountability in action plan (2008a).<br />
Other key components of cultural competence are elaborated in the cultural competence frameworks discussed<br />
below.<br />
B. Cultural Competence Frameworks<br />
Cultural competence frameworks can be broken down into two main kinds: individual core competency-defined<br />
frameworks, and intervention-area/level/domain defined frameworks. Whereas the former are generally oriented<br />
towards individual health practitioners, outlining the core individual-level competencies comprising ‘cultural<br />
competency’, intervention-area/level/domain frameworks are generally oriented towards organizations and systemlevel<br />
players, outlining the key domains, areas and levels for health care organizational/system cultural competence<br />
intervention.<br />
The latter intervention frameworks can be further subdivided between those that are thematically organized and<br />
those that are organized by domains for culturally competent intervention I. Individual Competency-Defined<br />
Frameworks<br />
Sue et al. (1996) Tripartite Framework<br />
D. W. Sue, Ivey and Pederson (1996) developed the most widely cited cultural competence conceptual framework<br />
for outlining the specific nature of knowledge and skills required to become culturally competent at the individual<br />
health practitioner/counsellor level. Their conceptual scheme includes three general competency areas, defined more<br />
specifically in the context of counsellor-client relations:<br />
• Cultural awareness and beliefs, which pertains to “[p]rovider’s sensitivity to her or his personal values and<br />
biases and how these may influence perceptions of the client, client’s problem, and the counselling<br />
relationship”.<br />
• Cultural knowledge, which pertains to [c]ounsellor’s knowledge of the client’s culture, worldview, and<br />
expectations for the counselling relationship”; and<br />
• Cultural skills, which relates to “[c]ounsellor’s ability to intervene in a manner that is culturally sensitive and<br />
relevant” (Sue, 2006).<br />
This tripartite framework informs the American Psychological Association’s Multicultural Guidelines (2003) and<br />
numerous other cultural competency training modules and standards of culturally competent care (see Part III on<br />
Training and Haarmans, 2004 for more detailed elaboration of competencies within this tripartite framework).<br />
39