20.02.2014 Views

CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...

CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...

CDE Appendix 1 Literature Review - Central East Local Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Culture, Diversity and Equity Project: <strong>Literature</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

Canada, although an intellectual leader in research on health equity (from a health promotion and population health<br />

perspective), has failed to develop concrete health equity policies and political leadership on the issue of health<br />

disparities. There are promising developments in this respect however, such as the formation of an intergovernmental<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Disparities Task Group and growing attention to health equity in the Ontario Provincial<br />

Ministry of <strong>Health</strong> and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) and <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Integration Networks (LHIN) contexts.<br />

Policy Lessons From Around the World<br />

A review of international health equity policy literature provides a number of key policy lessons:<br />

• Academic, governmental, and community collaboration in the realm of health in/equity is critical to advancing<br />

health equity policy.<br />

• The most effective approaches to health equity combine and incorporate, in varying degrees:<br />

• <strong>Health</strong> equity and health care equity policy objectives;<br />

• Upstream, midstream and downstream (‘all stream’) policy interventions; and<br />

• Universalist and selectivist approaches.<br />

This is partly due to the political acceptability of such broad, compound approaches which can appeal to<br />

multiple audiences and constituencies across the political spectrum (depending on their emphases). <strong>Health</strong><br />

equity policies should strategically align themselves, wherever possible, with national and local political/policy<br />

contexts to gain traction;<br />

• Policy objectives should be clearly articulated in achievable, measurable terms;<br />

• Policies should base themselves on evidence of what causes health inequity and what remedies or prevents<br />

health inequity (i.e., appropriate and successful interventions). In the absence of evidence, pilot demonstration<br />

projects, and their evaluation, are crucial. However, evidence is not enough, and policy choices must also be<br />

made upon ethical priorities and commitments; and<br />

• The health care sector should play a leading role in advancing a broad intersectoral health equity policy agenda<br />

that addresses social determinants of health. Intersectoral collaboration has been shown to be fundamental to the<br />

success of a comprehensive health equity policy.<br />

Part 2: Accountability, Compliance and Quality Assurance<br />

Part II examines the means of ensuring accountability and compliance with respect to health equity policies and<br />

objectives, and quality assurance strategies.<br />

The ways in which health equity policies and strategies are formulated can greatly impact their realization and how<br />

accountability is established. It is particularly important to:<br />

• Articulate clear and realistic policy objectives in terms that can be measured and made operational;<br />

• Establish concrete action plans that clarify what will be done, by when and by whom, and how success will be<br />

measured;<br />

• Include diverse stakeholders (including community stakeholders) in the policy development process; and<br />

• Ensure compliance and accountability through leadership and governance arrangements.<br />

Governance for health equity strategies should extend to the highest authority in the health care service system (‘the<br />

tree top’) to ensure:<br />

• Coherent integration of health equity concerns across all policy, program, service/function areas;<br />

• Effective performance management across the system; and<br />

• <strong>Local</strong> relevance of decisions, services, and public accountability by involving and supporting the ‘grassroots’<br />

and building on their insights and experience.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!