17.03.2014 Views

Complete 2012 forensic audit documents - Kansas Bioscience ...

Complete 2012 forensic audit documents - Kansas Bioscience ...

Complete 2012 forensic audit documents - Kansas Bioscience ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• KBA investment in three venture capital funds under the <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Bioscience</strong> Growth<br />

Fund – March 2010 through October 2010<br />

• Tom Thornton resigned – April 2011<br />

• KBA headquarters moved to the Venture Accelerator building – May 2011<br />

INVESTMENT PROCESS<br />

The review of KBA’s investment process was one focus of BKD’s procedures, as was the review<br />

of specific investments.<br />

KBA has an established, standardized investment process for all potential grants or investments<br />

that are considered under a KBA program. Each program managed by KBA has its own unique<br />

program guidelines and application materials; however, the review process detailed below is the<br />

same regardless of the funding program, with the exception of Proof of Concept Investments less<br />

than $75,000.<br />

Application Assessment<br />

Initial assessments of all application submissions are made by an HBV staff member applying<br />

program guidelines and eligibility and investment criteria, and is based on a review of written<br />

submissions provided by the entity seeking investment. KBA rejects many opportunities at this<br />

assessment stage with an email or telephone call. The basis for rejection varies, but includes the<br />

perceived lack of viability, the existence of other established and accepted competing products or<br />

services, a lack of conformance with KBA’s then current strategic direction for investments, and<br />

the lack of budgeted funds for the specific program under which the application is submitted.<br />

The aim is to qualify submissions quickly before either party allocates and uses significant<br />

resources. The submitter of each rejected investment has the opportunity to request a debriefing<br />

session with the HBV staff member and is given the opportunity to reapply with a modified<br />

submission.<br />

Scientific and Financial Due Diligence<br />

All eligible applications are subjected to scientific and financial due diligence, among other<br />

evaluation criteria required by the program’s guidelines. HBV staff members conduct due<br />

diligence on most investment opportunities but may also choose to contract with outside parties<br />

to provide additional capabilities in unique circumstances, such as the review of specialized<br />

science and technology for the Eminent Scholars program.<br />

During the scientific and financial due diligence, HBV staff discuss the opportunity in weekly<br />

deal flow meetings. If it is determined that an opportunity is potentially suitable for investment,<br />

an initial Investment Recommendation is prepared for presentation to KBA’s Investment<br />

Committee, a standing committee of the BOD. The Investment Recommendation is forwarded<br />

to Investment Committee members five to seven days prior to the scheduled Investment<br />

Committee meeting to give directors sufficient time to review the Investment Recommendation<br />

and formulate their questions.<br />

David Vranicar, President of HBV, and other members of HBV staff indicated that Mr. Thornton<br />

rarely attended deal flow meetings and would often first become aware of an investment<br />

opportunity through his review of the Investment Recommendation prior to its submission to the<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!