Draft Report of the Expert Group on International STI Cooperation to ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tab. 1: Levels <strong>of</strong> international RTDI cooperation differentiated by main rationales, instruments and responsible actors Levels Targeted R&D collaboration ’open’ intl. R&D collaboration General measures to reduce transaction costs International S&T- Policy Cooperation (across <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r categories mentioned above) Why? Main S&T objective How? Main instruments intl. • Cooperation to address global • Joint calls challenges • Co-ordinated calls • Addressing o<strong>the</strong>r joint <strong>the</strong>matic • ERA-NETs, JPIs, priorities (win-win) Twinning) • Regional priority rationales (e.g. • Joint centers (virtual or Neighbourhood policy, physical) R4Development) • Increasing research quality and • Opening up national fostering excellence funding programmes to • ’technology for market’ research intl. participation cooperation (’general opening’) • Gaining resources (know-how, • General funding intl brains, funding, students, research cooperation technologies ...) (e.g. top-up funding for additional costs) • Promoting mobility • Promote globalisation • Fostering market access and penetration • Streng<strong>the</strong>ning attractiveness for investment and human capital • Support science diplomacy (broad extension) • Support priority setting towards joint objectives • Preparing and supporting joint activities (e.g. cost and risk reduction concerning large scale RI; joint funding; joint evaluation) • Support STI policy learning • Demonstrators, test sites • Standard-setting • Simplification • IPR protection • Consortia building support • Business advisory services (e.g. IPR helpdesk in China) • Removing mobility barriers • Policy dialogue fora • Good practice exchange and learning exercises • Intl. S&T policy mix peer reviews & benchmarkings • Joint ”intelligence” events • Policy support projects Who? Responsibilities • EC • Ministries • Research councils • Innovation agencies • Regions • EC • Ministries (not only STI) • Research councils • Universities • Research institutes • EC • Ministries (not only STI) • Research councils • Trade and investment promotion agencies • Innovation and enterprise development agencies • Patenting <strong>of</strong>fices • EC • Ministries (not only STI) • Research councils and innovation agencies • STI policy support organisations • Development agencies 32
Fig. 2: Measures and instruments for priority setting in international cooperation Fig. 3: A Dynamic policy framework Fig. 3 illustrates a more dynamic view in which <strong>the</strong> measures and instruments are interconnected, and priorities are linked clearly to EU policies and objectives. Key support activities such as bottom-up stakeholders’ consulation and buy-in as well as intelligence 33
Page 1 and 2: International Cooperation in Scienc
Page 3 and 4: EUROPEAN COMMISSION International C
Page 5 and 6: Table of contents
Page 7 and 8: Composition of <st
Page 9 and 10: List of abbreviati
Page 11 and 12: Executive summary Changes in <stron
Page 13 and 14: Research and innovation infrastruct
Page 15 and 16: allow strategic partnerships with a
Page 17 and 18: 5. Variable geometry should be expl
Page 19 and 20: ERA was discussed as part o
Page 21 and 22: • Enable EU and MS to tackle glob
Page 23 and 24: innovation policy needs to anticipa
Page 25 and 26: • Developing economies with stron
Page 27 and 28: • The general opening principle a
Page 29 and 30: third countries, while the<
Page 31 and 32: and Member States of</stron
Page 33: intrinsic objectives of</st
Page 37 and 38: and lead to a significantly more at
Page 39 and 40: Fig. 4 Long and medium term priorit
Page 41 and 42: in nature, and in general occur bet
Page 43 and 44: egulations and values that make up
Page 45 and 46: Towards a strategic approach A stra
Page 47 and 48: Exploit variable geometry Objective
Page 49 and 50: third countries, typically with <st
Page 51 and 52: c) with a strong jointly accessible
Page 53 and 54: e) funded by the E
Page 55 and 56: The need for an evidence- and analy
Page 57 and 58: 1) Understanding the</stron
Page 59 and 60: Scientific collaboration: (priority
Page 61 and 62: • International acquisition <stro
Page 63 and 64: • a collaboration of</str
Page 65 and 66: • Information on national priorit
Page 67 and 68: Conclusions and key policy recommen
Page 69 and 70: educational level of</stron
Page 71 and 72: Kaiser L., Ganea P., Gibson J., and
Page 73 and 74: Annex 1: Mandate of</strong
Page 75 and 76: Consideration should include: - def
Page 77 and 78: Annex 2: Dimensions of</str
Page 79 and 80: Annex 3: Trends, Drivers and Impact
Page 81 and 82: however, is not so far justified by
Page 83 and 84: companies from different countries
Page 85 and 86:
competitors are located in
Page 87 and 88:
This engineering pattern is, howeve
Page 89 and 90:
Researcher mobility schemes operati
Page 91:
SME are usually constricted due to
Page 95 and 96:
How to obtain EU publications Free
show all

Draft Report of the Expert Group on International STI Cooperation to ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?