Draft Report of the Expert Group on International STI Cooperation to ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Ex ante and ex post evaluations should be carried out and distributed to all involved as well as a broader community <strong>of</strong> identified stakeholders. • Foresight studies and o<strong>the</strong>r information on future developments in key STI fields and countries/regions should be made easily available. Modalities and practices <strong>of</strong> information sharing The complexity <strong>of</strong> international cooperation, not least among MS with different traditions, vested interests, strategic objectives and STI systems, makes it crucial that <strong>the</strong> Commission takes a visible lead in defining a policy for information sharing. The fragmentation and disparities make a key actor highly necessary, one that can provide momentum and synergies as a gravitation point in <strong>the</strong> cooperative landscape. The Commission with its Framework Programme (H2020) as a key resource is <strong>the</strong> only partner in Europe who can do that. A strategy for international cooperation in STI should differentiate between active and passive modalities depending on purpose. It goes without saying that a great bulk <strong>of</strong> data and information to be shared will be made available on web-sites among stakeholders and participants/partners. Such information should be produced according to common guidelines to ease accessibility and use. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>re will be “living documents” such as strategic research agendas that are regularly revised and updated. A more active approach will be dedicated workshops to share information and lessons during <strong>the</strong> build-up <strong>of</strong> a strategic action that helps stimulating a common information and knowledge base. This includes <strong>the</strong> Strategic Forum for International STI Cooperation (SFIC), which, supported by a data subgroup, serves as <strong>the</strong> most important forum where such information can be presented, priorities defined, and partners selected. 64
Conclusions and key policy recommendations Pulling all elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present analysis toge<strong>the</strong>r, it is clear that Europe finds itself at a crossroads: Fundamental changes in <strong>the</strong> global research and innovation landscape are taking place. The increasingly pressing global challenges urgently require a strategic and forward looking response at EU level. Hence, <strong>the</strong> overall recommendation is to develop 1) A strategy with a focus on streng<strong>the</strong>ning European attractiveness as international research and innovation hub and partner in order to streng<strong>the</strong>n European competitiveness and prosperity Europe needs to get at <strong>the</strong> forefront <strong>of</strong> international collaboration in STI by making it <strong>the</strong> place to be for international researchers and non-EU MNEs. Secondly, <strong>the</strong> EU must provide <strong>the</strong>ir stakeholders an infrastructure to expand to o<strong>the</strong>r regions into <strong>the</strong> world and help universities, SMEs in particular to reach out to those markets in selected <strong>the</strong>mes addressing <strong>the</strong> grand challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> next decades. Only few countries have so far developed an integrated policy strategy. In <strong>the</strong> US and <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>the</strong> overarching, strategic orientation <strong>of</strong> policy is to support world-class excellence in science with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> generating attractiveness for R&D activities by MNEs. The emergence <strong>of</strong> China on <strong>the</strong> global S&T scene is backed by elements <strong>of</strong> an integrated policy strategy, albeit with strong elements <strong>of</strong> a planned economy context. Currently <strong>the</strong>re is a dominance <strong>of</strong> geographical prioritization through picking countries. This has been especially evident in SFIC. This should change: 2) Theme- and problem-oriented prioritization is needed ra<strong>the</strong>r than geographic; Grand Challenges as a clear prioritization tool to be mainstreamed also in <strong>the</strong> international dimension. Prioritization <strong>of</strong> international collaboration should follow closely <strong>the</strong> priorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU’s core research and innovation programmes, while <strong>the</strong> geographical approach should be <strong>the</strong> core <strong>of</strong> an implementation strategy. This also implies that 3) The international perspective needs to be more fully integrated into ’regular’ programmes at EU level All EU programmes (old and new instruments) should be required to have an international dimension, e.g. through benchmarking and monitoring, identification <strong>of</strong> relevant partners – and competitors– outside Europe and activities for streng<strong>the</strong>ning cooperation with non-EU partners and/or activities aimed at increasing proximity to relevant markets and users outside Europe. This requires <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> evaluators and evaluation criteria to valuate and evaluate international partners and collaborations; criteria should be based on complementarities and critical assets for R&D projects. 65
Page 1 and 2:
International Cooperation in Scienc
Page 3 and 4:
EUROPEAN COMMISSION International C
Page 5 and 6:
Table of contents
Page 7 and 8:
Composition of <st
Page 9 and 10:
List of abbreviati
Page 11 and 12:
Executive summary Changes in <stron
Page 13 and 14:
Research and innovation infrastruct
Page 15 and 16: allow strategic partnerships with a
Page 17 and 18: 5. Variable geometry should be expl
Page 19 and 20: ERA was discussed as part o
Page 21 and 22: • Enable EU and MS to tackle glob
Page 23 and 24: innovation policy needs to anticipa
Page 25 and 26: • Developing economies with stron
Page 27 and 28: • The general opening principle a
Page 29 and 30: third countries, while the<
Page 31 and 32: and Member States of</stron
Page 33 and 34: intrinsic objectives of</st
Page 35 and 36: Fig. 2: Measures and instruments fo
Page 37 and 38: and lead to a significantly more at
Page 39 and 40: Fig. 4 Long and medium term priorit
Page 41 and 42: in nature, and in general occur bet
Page 43 and 44: egulations and values that make up
Page 45 and 46: Towards a strategic approach A stra
Page 47 and 48: Exploit variable geometry Objective
Page 49 and 50: third countries, typically with <st
Page 51 and 52: c) with a strong jointly accessible
Page 53 and 54: e) funded by the E
Page 55 and 56: The need for an evidence- and analy
Page 57 and 58: 1) Understanding the</stron
Page 59 and 60: Scientific collaboration: (priority
Page 61 and 62: • International acquisition <stro
Page 63 and 64: • a collaboration of</str
Page 65: • Information on national priorit
Page 69 and 70: educational level of</stron
Page 71 and 72: Kaiser L., Ganea P., Gibson J., and
Page 73 and 74: Annex 1: Mandate of</strong
Page 75 and 76: Consideration should include: - def
Page 77 and 78: Annex 2: Dimensions of</str
Page 79 and 80: Annex 3: Trends, Drivers and Impact
Page 81 and 82: however, is not so far justified by
Page 83 and 84: companies from different countries
Page 85 and 86: competitors are located in
Page 87 and 88: This engineering pattern is, howeve
Page 89 and 90: Researcher mobility schemes operati
Page 91: SME are usually constricted due to
Page 95 and 96: How to obtain EU publications Free
show all

Draft Report of the Expert Group on International STI Cooperation to ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?