30.03.2014 Views

ISSUE 91 : Nov/Dec - 1991 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 91 : Nov/Dec - 1991 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 91 : Nov/Dec - 1991 - Australian Defence Force Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Change in Work Value in the <strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Force</strong>s<br />

By Lieutenant Colonel Gerard Nelson, RA R and<br />

Captain Gillian Daniell, A Res.<br />

Introduction<br />

What is Work Value and why has the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

<strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Force</strong> (ADF) spent a considerable<br />

amount of effort on a Work Value Project? After the<br />

1987 Service Allowance Pay Case, the (then) <strong>Defence</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong> Advocate, David Quick QC recommended<br />

that a study on work value in the ADF be<br />

undertaken as the results of that case indicted that<br />

there have been significant changes in the type and<br />

scope of jobs carried out by members of the ADF. It<br />

was decided that a project team would be established<br />

to investigate changes in work value.<br />

Work Value can be defined as the product of the<br />

work, skill and responsibility of a particular type of<br />

employment expressed in dollar terms. Work Value<br />

change arises from changes in the skill and responsibility<br />

of a job or changes in the conditions under<br />

which work is performed. Integral to work value<br />

change assessment are the following factors:<br />

a. any changes in Work Value must be significant,<br />

b. these changes have to be performed by the<br />

category, and<br />

c. the results of these changes would have to occur<br />

regularly and permanently.<br />

Throughout this article several terms will be<br />

frequently used. The definitions of these terms for<br />

the purpose of this article and the survey terms are as<br />

follows:<br />

a. Job Standard. This is regarded as the minimum<br />

standard of professional competence that supervisors<br />

in a particular trade would accept from<br />

personnel in their employment classification.<br />

b. Job Environment. This refers to the normal<br />

environment within which the employment<br />

classification is found.<br />

c. Manning Levels. This refers to the established<br />

manning level.<br />

d. Employment Classification. This is the single,<br />

service neutral term that relates to the employment<br />

fields or trades within the three services.<br />

This article will discuss the importance of a need<br />

to look at the ADF in terms of job value and how<br />

the importance of change can affect even the most<br />

routine jobs with a view to maintaining accurate and<br />

dynamic information on ADF work for future<br />

structural reviews, pay cases and conditions of<br />

service.<br />

Until 1981, no investigation into the jobs performed<br />

by members of the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Defence</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong>s (ADF) in terms of Work Value had been<br />

undertaken. In 1981 the first Work Value Inquiry<br />

took place. This inquiry looked at changes in the<br />

work environment in terms of responsibility, and<br />

skill level with a view to establishing whether there<br />

has been any change and what areas these changes<br />

have taken place. Assumptions that skill levels have<br />

increased because of the introduction of high technology<br />

equipment is not sufficient to argue a case for<br />

a pay rise due to increased skill. Skill is a product of<br />

training, education and on-the-job experience. An<br />

increase in skill level would therefore mean that<br />

there is a tangible increase in these factors.<br />

An empirical study was initiated, using the first<br />

study as a base. Titled the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Force</strong><br />

Work Value Project (ADF WVP), this study of all<br />

the jobs in the ADF consists of four comprehensive<br />

surveys designed to collect specific information on<br />

all jobs in the ADF and not only those previously<br />

listed in the first (1981) survey. The objective of this<br />

study was to provide a data base for all work<br />

performed by members of the ADF in terms of skill<br />

level, skill specialisation, responsibilities and job<br />

setting, constructed in industrially useful terms. It is<br />

this data base that will form a datum point against<br />

which future changes in the work of the ADF can be<br />

assessed.<br />

All officers are included in the survey population<br />

and 12,000 Other Ranks were selected to form a<br />

sample population for the Other Ranks Work<br />

Analysis survey.<br />

The raw data is collected and viewed wholistically.<br />

As in most surveys, the "big picture" is important for<br />

looking at emerging patterns. Information received<br />

from individuals piecemeal, provides the basis for<br />

the big picture, however every facet of every job<br />

needs to be considered to gain a realistic and<br />

complete profile. Geographic location in many<br />

cases, influences the format and type of training and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!