We are anonymous inside the hacker world of lulzse

More documents

Recommendations

Info

following twenty names in the ranking spelled out the words “Marblecake also the game.” This was thought to be a reference to the IRC channel in which much of Project Chanology was organized in 2008 (see chapter 5). Time magazine provided details of the hack in a video and quoted moot as saying that he had no idea who was behind the vote rigging. The stories of the Habbo Hotel raid and Operation Basement Dad come primarily from Davis’s testimony, but are also corroborated by online news reports, such as ReadWriteWeb’s April 16, 2009, article “Operation Basement Dad: How 4Chan Could Beat CNN & Ashton Kutcher” and, in the case of Habbo Hotel, the April 8, 2009, Fox News article “4Chan: The Rude, Raunchy Underbelly of the Internet.” Details of the origins of Internet Relay Chat come from the online article “History of IRC” by computer consultant and hacker Daniel Stenberg, posted on his website, http://daniel.haxx.se/. Some extra descriptions, such as the numbers of IRC channels and numbers of users in channels, come from my own exploration of IRC. The source for the common “Everyone get in here” feature is Jake “Topiary” Davis, and I have verified the phrase’s frequent use through repositories for image board content, such as chanarchive.org. Chapter 4: Kayla and the Rise of Anonymous Main sourcing on the backstory that Kayla claimed about her childhood and parents came from online interviews with Kayla herself (I refer to the online entity as “her.”). The source for the notion that Kayla lied about being a sixteen-year-old girl comes from my own observations and discussion with other hackers, with further evidence coming from the Metropolitan Police’s arrest of Ryan Ackroyd in September 2011. As of mid-April 2012, I cannot confirm that the person I was interviewing on Internet Relay Chat between March and September of 2011 was Ackroyd. As far as rumors that Kayla was “a transgender hacker,” Ackroyd did not appear to be transgender when he first appeared in Westminster Magistrates’ Court, then aged twenty-five, on March 16, 2012. The quote “Kayla seemed to have a deep need to tell stories to prove her value to others” comes from reading comments by Kayla in the leaked chat logs from #HQ and #pure-elite during the days of LulzSec, including those in which she boasted about attacks she instigated during Project Chanology. So elusive has Kayla been online that phone and face-to-face interviews conducted with Hector Monsegur, Jake Davis, Aaron Barr, Gregg Housh, Jennifer Emick, Laurelai Bailey, and other anonymous sources yielded little more than speculation about who she really was. Background information on the tendency for some men to claim to be women online comes from conversations with hackers and general knowledge from the world of memes and Internet culture. The phrase “There are no girls on the Internet” has its own entry in KnowYourMeme.com, from which some of this context is sourced, while the popular /b/ comment “Tits or GTFO” comes from my own exploration of /b/ and discussions with William. Incidentally, the list of 47 Rules of the Internet has been widely published online. In my explanation of IP addresses, I am referring in this instance to IPv4 addresses (which have now sold out). The latest IPv6 addresses are a combination of numbers and letters that are segmented by colons. Details about Partyvan were sourced from interviews with an organizer from the time of Chanology who wished to remain nameless, interviews with Kayla, and content on the partyvan.info website, also known as the /i/nsurgency W/i/ki. Details of the Fox L.A. television news report from July 2007 were sourced from a YouTube video of the report. Chapter 5: Chanology Details about the publication of the Tom Cruise video come from interviews with anti-Scientology campaigner Barbara Graham and emails exchanged with journalist Mark Ebner. Patty Pieniadz wrote her own detailed account, entitled “The Story Behind the Tom Cruise Video Leak,” and posted it on the forum WhyWeProtest.net under the nickname “pooks” on September 4, 2011; some of the first part of this chapter is also sourced from this account. Descriptions of the video come from watching the video itself on YouTube. According to Ebner, ex-Scientologist and TV journalist Mark Bunker had originally uploaded the video to his YouTube account and notified several of his media contacts. Then, a few hours later, he took the video down. The detail about Viacom’s $1 billion copyright lawsuit against YouTube parent Google was sourced from various news articles, including the New York Times story, “WhoseTube? Viacom Sues YouTube Over Video Clips,” published March 14, 2007. Text from the original discussion thread on /b/ about a raid on Scientology on January 15 come from 4chanarchive.org. The rumor that the original poster on /b/ for the first anti-Scientology thread was female come from an interview with Gregg Housh. Details about DDoS attacks come from numerous Web articles about how such cyber attacks work, along with background discussions with IT security professionals and hackers from Anonymous. The Graham Cluley analogy about “15 fat men” originally comes from an August 6, 2009, article by Cluley on the Naked Security blog of the research firm Sophos. Background on the 4chan attack on Hal Turner comes from numerous blog posts, as well as from archived 4chan threads. The point that one could download “at least a dozen free software tools” from 4chan’s /rs/ board to take part in some sort of DDoS attack comes from an interview with Housh. Details of phases 1, 2, 3, etc., and how /b/ was hitting Scientology.org, specifically with Gigaloader, come from an archive of the actual thread. Details about Gigaloader come from piecing together and corroborating various Internet forum discussions about the Web tool. Details later on in the chapter about the hundreds of people that piled into the #xenu channel on IRC, then the move to physical protests and establishment of the #marblecake organizational hub, come from a phone interview with Gregg Housh and e-mails exchanged with one other Chanology organizer who wished to remain anonymous. There also exists a timeline of the main Chanology events on the aptly named chanologytimeline.com. Housh confirmed in an interview that he had been arrested for copyright violations. Further details were sourced from a “motion for booker variance” filed through the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire on November 23, 2005. The motion showed that Housh
ooker variance” filed through the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire on November 23, 2005. The motion showed that Housh had pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate copyright laws, related to creating a computer program in the summer of 2001, which automatically searched for new software. Details about Housh’s family background were sourced from the court motion and the section “The History and Characteristics of the Defendant.” The motion also states Housh was approached by the FBI about the case in 2001, and that he sought to mitigate his offenses by cooperating with the Bureau “for four years.” Further details about Housh serving three months in federal prison come from Housh’s interview with the Huffington Post in the story “Anonymous and the War Over the Internet,” published on January 30, 2012. Housh’s age of thirty-five was also mentioned in the interview. The factoid about 25,000 Scientologists in America in 2008 originally comes from the American Religion Identification Survey, cited in a report by the Associated Press. Information on the posting of internal church documents by the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology is sourced from the January 2008 Globe and Mail article “Scientology vs. the Internet, part XVII.” The detail that XSS is the second most common hacking technique after SQL injection is sourced from the Web Hacking Incident Database (WHID) of 2011, an online database that tracks media-reported security incidents and is led by Ryan Barnett, senior security researcher on Trustwave’s SpiderLabs Research Team. Details about the technical impact of Anonymous DDoS attacks on Scientology’s website come from research by Arbor Networks, along with court documents related to Brian Mettenbrink’s case; these documents provide, among other things, the date when Scientology hired Prolexic Technologies. Details on LOIC come from numerous online articles about the Web application, screenshots of the interface, news reports from tech site Gizmodo, and research from the IT security firm Imperva. Details on Praetox come from the programmer’s own website, http://ptech.50webs.com/, which appears to have been created in 2007 but was abandoned around 2009 or 2010. The emergence of NewEraCracker as another programmer to develop LOIC comes from details on GitHub, a Web-based hosting service for software projects. The anecdote that Time Warner would profit from the V for Vendetta mask comes from an August 2011 article on the New York Times Bits blog. The example of a channel topic in #marblecake came from a chatlog provided by Jennifer Emick’s Backtrace Security, via logs obtained from a leak among Chanology organizers. The vast majority of details about Brian Mettenbrink come from a phone interview conducted with him on December 16, 2011, as well as from court documents and an FBI transcript, both of which were published on the Partyvan website. A few extra details came from an archive started when Mettenbrink uploaded a scan of his driver’s license and photo, along with the business card of one of his visiting FBI agents, to WhyWeProtest.net, as well as from comments in that thread made by Mettenbrink and others. Mettenbrink was banned from using the Internet for a year after his jail sentence and, at the time of this writing, still had to receive e-mails through a friend. Chapter 6: Civil War The vast majority of details about the experiences of Jennifer Emick are derived from phone interviews with Emick herself, as well as from a few interviews conducted over Skype text chat. Extra details about the methods of intimidation used by Scientology representatives against Anonymous protesters come from the testimony of Emick, Laurelai Bailey, various Web reports, and YouTube videos. Details about the life and experiences of Laurelai Bailey (formerly Wesley Bailey) come from phone interviews with Bailey herself, along with several discussions held via Internet Relay Chat and Skype text chat. The details of “simultaneous worldwide protests on February 10” come from Bailey’s and Emick’s own testimonies as well as from various blog posts that reported on the events afterward. Details about playing an audio version of OT3 at protests come from testimony by Laurelai Bailey as well as from the Der Spiegel article “Tom Cruise and the Church of Scientology,” published on June 28, 2005. The point about an alleged list of “murdered Scientology defectors” came originally from conversations with Jennifer Emick, who also pointed me to discussions on the anti-Scientology message board ocmb.xenu.net, also known as Operation Clambake. A number of campaigners on this board, for instance, believe that former Scientologist Ken Ogger, found dead in his swimming pool on May 29, 2007, was murdered. The description of Chanology as “full-blown activism” comes from interviews with multiple participants in the raids and protests, including Emick, Laurelai Bailey, and an anonymous Chanology organizer, with viewpoints split on whether the veering toward activism was a good thing or not. The notion that Scientology “stopped coming out to play,” i.e., stopped responding defensively to the antics of Anonymous, is sourced from testimony by Bailey and Emick, as well as from various online forums in which Chanology is discussed, such as WhyWeProtest.net. The rows between IRC network operators, including the quote “you have no idea who you’re fucking with,” are sourced from Emick’s testimony, and the squabbles are also chronicled in detail on the main Partyvan website. Details of Scientology’s litigation against Gregg Housh are sourced from various news reports, including an October 2008 article in The Inquirer entitled “Anti Scientology Activist Off the Hook. Sort of.” Scientology’s perspective on receiving “death threats” is sourced from a CNN video from May of 2008, in which the news network’s John Roberts spoke to a Scientology spokesman who claimed that Anonymous was “terrorizing the church.” Details about the way Emick “outed” Bailey’s online nickname, Raziel, leading to their falling-out, come from the accounts by both Emick and Bailey. The information about SWATing a house comes from testimony from Emick as well as from interviews with William, who directed me to websites that showed the steps one needs to take to “SWAT” someone.
Page 2 and 3:
Begin Reading Table of Contents Cop
Page 4 and 5:
his HBGary Federal account, possibl
Page 6 and 7:
culture and key figures within it.
Page 8 and 9:
dreadful fascination at his phone a
Page 10 and 11:
Aaron Barr would never have come fa
Page 12 and 13:
“nigger,” “faggot,” or just
Page 14 and 15:
owns my ass.” With his other hand
Page 16 and 17:
In 2008 he helped instigate Operati
Page 18 and 19:
death threats and threatened to bom
Page 20 and 21:
another poster described “Phase 2
Page 22 and 23:
though, they were usurped by what w
Page 24 and 25:
We are Legion We do not forgive We
Page 26 and 27:
day in federal prison. In the meant
Page 28 and 29:
Since childhood, Bailey had harbore
Page 30 and 31:
oughly three hundred regular chat p
Page 32 and 33:
1. Get the latest LOIC from github.
Page 34 and 35:
Asperger syndrome, rarely left his
Page 36 and 37:
“It’s a troll,” another organ
Page 38 and 39:
had joined mentoring program iMento
Page 40 and 41:
choose a unique nickname on AnonOps
Page 42 and 43:
time. Kayla actually had several IR
Page 44 and 45:
was headquartered and where Barr wo
Page 46 and 47:
“So are we going to focus on Anon
Page 48 and 49:
Starting in early January, many sup
Page 50 and 51:
“Well in my lifetime I’ve perfo
Page 52 and 53:
uh, actual intelligence.” There w
Page 54 and 55:
definitely unimpressed—the claims
Page 56 and 57:
nude photos. Four years later, an e
Page 58 and 59:
“Is this a new trend :D to see wh
Page 60 and 61:
network collapsed, they would move
Page 62 and 63:
large notice board with paperwork a
Page 64 and 65: April 2011, while he and Sabu were
Page 66 and 67: since they had a wider array of ski
Page 68 and 69: will get in trouble and might be gr
Page 70 and 71: passwords for almost every journali
Page 72 and 73: or online for most of the day and s
Page 74 and 75: a mixture of Anons, script kiddies,
Page 76 and 77: Sabu hated white hat security firms
Page 78 and 79: “Just looked at this guy’s sour
Page 80 and 81: otnets. Topiary shot back with a se
Page 82 and 83: wasn’t Sabu. “You got the wrong
Page 84 and 85: them that he was back. Topiary at f
Page 86 and 87: websites, bigger ones. He had a rap
Page 88 and 89: “Y’all were the inspiration I n
Page 90 and 91: LulzSec. Tflow created a torrent fi
Page 92 and 93: The Fate of Lulz LulzSec’s signif
Page 94 and 95: opposite of Kayla. And yet there wa
Page 96 and 97: one of the LulzSec accounts in resp
Page 98 and 99: on the network. He decided to try t
Page 100 and 101: morning of their meeting, William
Page 102 and 103: techniques like the Cain and Abel p
Page 104 and 105: hackers in private IRC rooms. It wa
Page 106 and 107: the open at the same time: the susp
Page 108 and 109: Kayla’s story had become more imp
Page 110 and 111: Stephane Fitch, who also introduced
Page 112 and 113: writes a spoof news article about t
Page 116 and 117: to websites that showed the steps o
Page 118 and 119: Minions.” Another helpful source
Page 120 and 121: “extreme version of Calvinism”
Page 122 and 123: 2011, however, we held our first re
Page 124 and 125: that were first leaked online by Pa
Page 126 and 127: on the CIA. Details about Julian As
Page 128 and 129: Descriptions of Ryan Mark Ackroyd w
Page 130 and 131: Parmy Olson is the London bureau ch
show all

We are anonymous inside the hacker world of lulzse

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?