26.04.2014 Views

34-36 Bedford Road, London SW4 - Lambeth Council

34-36 Bedford Road, London SW4 - Lambeth Council

34-36 Bedford Road, London SW4 - Lambeth Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

no. 3 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong> are to a stairwell, reducing the potential for loss of privacy<br />

here. The distance between habitable room windows for the properties from 11-<br />

23 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong> are over 30m away, and at no.9 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong> the proposed<br />

windows are 19.3m away from the closest point, this is not considered to result<br />

in an unacceptable impact on overlooking or privacy between these houses.<br />

The properties from 54-72 <strong>Bedford</strong> <strong>Road</strong> are set at an obscure angle, and due<br />

to this arrangement should not result in any loss of privacy between the<br />

windows. To the north, there is a 17m separation distance with Cadmus House<br />

which exceeds the 16.5m distance between the three storey properties across<br />

Aristotle <strong>Road</strong>, and therefore given the surrounding context, this relationship is<br />

considered to be acceptable and the levels of overlooking would be similar to<br />

those in the surrounding area. Overall it is considered that whilst there would be<br />

windows in close proximity to the rear of 1-7 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong>, this report<br />

concludes that, on balance, the proposed development would not have such a<br />

negative impact on overlooking and privacy to neighbouring properties to justify<br />

refusal on this ground.<br />

11 Impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties in terms of loss of<br />

sunlight/daylight, overlooking and loss of privacy and sense of enclosure<br />

11.1 The applicants have submitted a daylight and sunlight assessment, which<br />

demonstrates that there would not be any detrimental impacts to the daylight<br />

and sunlight of the majority of the surrounding rooms. However, a total of 11<br />

windows would not pass the required daylighting VSC standard. All but one of<br />

these windows are located to the north-east elevation of the properties at 1-7<br />

Aristotle <strong>Road</strong> and the affected windows generally serve kitchens or are<br />

secondary windows to kitchen/living/dining rooms. Additionally one window at<br />

the ground floor south-east elevation at 3 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong> would not pass the<br />

VSC standards. This would achieve an appropriate Average Daylight Factor<br />

(1%) for a bedroom, which is the likely use of this room. Two windows fail the<br />

APSH tests, one located at the ground floor south-east elevation at 3 Aristotle<br />

<strong>Road</strong> and one at the ground floor of 27 Cadmus Close. The impact on the<br />

amenity of these properties is regrettable, however on balance given the<br />

infrequency of this occurance it is considered that this would not be sufficient to<br />

refuse planning permission on this basis given the planning benefits that would<br />

be accrued by this scheme.<br />

12.2 Balconies are proposed to the west elevation of the proposed block, however,<br />

as detailed above, a condition is recommended to ensure that screening is put<br />

in place which should also be required to mitigate any potential for any loss of<br />

privacy or overlooking back to the <strong>Bedford</strong> <strong>Road</strong> properties from the proposed<br />

balconies.<br />

12.3 The proposed building would result in the development of an area which is<br />

currently used as a car parking area, therefore any buildings on this site will<br />

alter the relationship with the nearby dwellings. However, due to the separation<br />

distances between the main aspect of the nearby buildings (which are set out<br />

above), and the design of the building which steps back away from the closest<br />

properties at Cadmus Close and 1-7 Aristotle <strong>Road</strong>, it is not considered that the<br />

increased sense of enclosure would exist to the extent that would justify the<br />

refusal of planning permission on these grounds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!