34-36 Bedford Road, London SW4 - Lambeth Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

condition. Section 17 of The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which imposes an obligation on the Local Planning Authority to consider crime and disorder reduction in the assessment of planning applications. 16.2 There are some concerns about the layout of the internal secure cycle storage and detail of this would be secured by condition. 17 S106 Contributions/CIL 17.1 The development has been assessed against the Council’s SPD ‘S106 planning obligations, which gives rise to the following contributions to mitigate the impacts of the development on local infrastructure: Education: £92,311.27 Health: £32,312.00 Libraries: £5,838.65 Sport and Leisure: £21,775.65 Parks and Open Space: £57,273.60 Public Art: £42,541.98 Revenue Contributions: £5,727.36 Travel Plan monitoring: £1,000 Local Labour in Construction: £21,270.99 Monitoring Fee £16,129.67 Resulting in a total of: £296,181.17 Given the developer is providing a play area on site, so it is not considered to be reasonable to secure funding for play areas outside of the development. In addition to these requirements there are some site specific measures which are also proposed to be included in the S106 agreement. These are as follows: • Travel Plans • Affordable Housing on site provision • Lifetime Car Club membership provision for residents • All residential units to be car parking permit free 17.2 In addition, the scheme would be liable for Mayoral CIL payments. From 6th April 2010, regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy gave statutory force to the three part test what was set out in Circular 05/2005. Regulation 122 provides that a planning obligation may only constitute a reason for granting planning permission if the obligation is:- a. necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms, b. directly related to the development, and c. fairly and reasonably related to the scale and kind to the development Before resolving to grant planning permission subject to a legal agreement members should therefore satisfy themselves that the subject matter of the proposed agreement will meet these test. 18 Other Issues
18.1 The applicant has submitted an archaeological desk based assessment, which suggests that further investigation may be required prior to development. This approach is supported by English Heritage who advise that a condition should be imposed on any permission to secure further work by condition. Therefore there are no objections on these grounds. 18.2 The Environment Agency do not raise any objections on the grounds of site contamination, subject to a condition requiring remediation for any contaminated land if identified during development. A condition is recommended on this basis. 19 Conclusion 19.1 The redevelopment of this site for a mixed use scheme incorporating business use and residential floorsapce is considered to be acceptable in principle. The detail of this proposal is generally acceptable, and whilst there are concerns about the impact of the development on the light, outlook and privacy to the rear elevations of 1-7 Aristotle Road, the scheme is considered to be generally in accordance with the provisions of the development plan and is recommended for approval. 20 Recommendation 20.1 Grant conditional planning permission subject to the satisfactory completion of a s106 agreement. 21 Summary of the Reasons 21.1 In deciding to grant planning permission, the Council has had regard to the relevant policies of the Development Plan and all other relevant material considerations. Having weighed the merits of the proposal in the context of these issues, it is considered that planning permission should be granted subject to the conditions listed below. In reaching this decision the following policies were relevant: 21.2 London Plan (2011): • 2.18 Green Infrastructure: The network of open and green spaces • 3.3: Increasing housing supply • 3.4: Optimising Housing potential • 3.5: Quality and design of housing developments • 3.6: Children's and Young People's Play and Informal Recreation facilities • 3.8: Housing Choice • 3.10: Definition of affordable housing • 3.11: Affordable Housing targets • 3.12: negotiating affordable housing on individual private residential and mixed use schemes • 3.13 affordable housing thresholds • 4.1: Developing London’s economy • 4.2: Offices
Page 2 and 3: Site address Ward Proposal Applicat
Page 4 and 5: Consultation Department(s) or Organ
Page 6 and 7: 3 Planning History 3.1 Planning per
Page 8 and 9: 5.1 A total of 207 neighbours were
Page 10 and 11: area. Neighbouring Amenity - daylig
Page 12 and 13: • 4.2: Offices • 4.3: Mixed use
Page 14 and 15: 7.7 Therefore the proposed mix of b
Page 16 and 17: 741sqm of communal amenity space, w
Page 18 and 19: 12.4 The development of the area cu
Page 22 and 23: • 4.3: Mixed use development and
Page 24 and 25: Planning Authority prior to commenc
Page 26 and 27: appropriate visual appearance (Poli
Page 28 and 29: Reason: To ensure an adequate level
Page 30: 5 You are advised of the necessity

34-36 Bedford Road, London SW4 - Lambeth Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?