View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
L A M B T O N S H O R E S C O M M U N I T Y A S S O C I A T I O N<br />
DRAFT<br />
<strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association<br />
P.O. Box 107<br />
Grand Bend, ON<br />
N0M 1T0<br />
August 9,2012<br />
To the Mayor and all members <strong>of</strong> Council:<br />
At our Annual meeting on July, 7, 2012, the Chair <strong>of</strong> the Plan 24<br />
Committee submitted her report. Among other things the Report<br />
details the failure <strong>of</strong> by-law enforcement to follow through on 2<br />
Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment meetings that required compliance by the<br />
owners <strong>of</strong> 11 and 13 Woodward St.<br />
A re-cap <strong>of</strong> activities to date includes:<br />
November 10, 2011- neighbours received the Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment<br />
notice <strong>of</strong> the hearing to be held<br />
Thursday, November 24, 2011- At least fourteen letters were sent<br />
objecting to the minor variance application and six <strong>of</strong> those people were<br />
in attendance at the hearing.<br />
November 25, 2011 -<strong>The</strong> report given to Council was that "<strong>The</strong> Committee<br />
deferred this application in order for the Applicant to work with the<br />
neighbours who opposed the application to come up with a solution that<br />
would be suitable to all concerned. <strong>The</strong> Applicant was granted 60 days to<br />
submit a new proposal and should that 60 days lapse, the fence must be<br />
brought into compliance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Fence By-law 80 <strong>of</strong><br />
2008."<br />
February 10, 2012- a re-notification letter was sent to neighbours,<br />
indicating that another Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment hearing was being held<br />
on Thursday, February 23, 2012.<br />
February 29, 2012 -<strong>The</strong> report submitted to Council by the Committee<br />
stated "<strong>The</strong> Committee refused this application as, in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Committee, the variances were not minor in nature, the intent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fence by-law was not maintained, and the variances were not desirable<br />
for the appropriate development or use <strong>of</strong> the land."<br />
Neighbours were all sent a copy <strong>of</strong> the Decision <strong>of</strong> the Committee <strong>of</strong><br />
Adjustment, restating that an application requesting a variance from the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the Fence By-law to permit:<br />
P . O B O X 107, G R A N D B E N D , O N , N 0 M 1 T 0<br />
• E M A I L L S C o m m u n i t y A s s o c @ g m a i l . c o m<br />
34