26.04.2014 Views

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L A M B T O N S H O R E S C O M M U N I T Y A S S O C I A T I O N<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association<br />

P.O. Box 107<br />

Grand Bend, ON<br />

N0M 1T0<br />

August 9,2012<br />

To the Mayor and all members <strong>of</strong> Council:<br />

At our Annual meeting on July, 7, 2012, the Chair <strong>of</strong> the Plan 24<br />

Committee submitted her report. Among other things the Report<br />

details the failure <strong>of</strong> by-law enforcement to follow through on 2<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment meetings that required compliance by the<br />

owners <strong>of</strong> 11 and 13 Woodward St.<br />

A re-cap <strong>of</strong> activities to date includes:<br />

November 10, 2011- neighbours received the Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> the hearing to be held<br />

Thursday, November 24, 2011- At least fourteen letters were sent<br />

objecting to the minor variance application and six <strong>of</strong> those people were<br />

in attendance at the hearing.<br />

November 25, 2011 -<strong>The</strong> report given to Council was that "<strong>The</strong> Committee<br />

deferred this application in order for the Applicant to work with the<br />

neighbours who opposed the application to come up with a solution that<br />

would be suitable to all concerned. <strong>The</strong> Applicant was granted 60 days to<br />

submit a new proposal and should that 60 days lapse, the fence must be<br />

brought into compliance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Fence By-law 80 <strong>of</strong><br />

2008."<br />

February 10, 2012- a re-notification letter was sent to neighbours,<br />

indicating that another Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment hearing was being held<br />

on Thursday, February 23, 2012.<br />

February 29, 2012 -<strong>The</strong> report submitted to Council by the Committee<br />

stated "<strong>The</strong> Committee refused this application as, in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee, the variances were not minor in nature, the intent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fence by-law was not maintained, and the variances were not desirable<br />

for the appropriate development or use <strong>of</strong> the land."<br />

Neighbours were all sent a copy <strong>of</strong> the Decision <strong>of</strong> the Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

Adjustment, restating that an application requesting a variance from the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Fence By-law to permit:<br />

P . O B O X 107, G R A N D B E N D , O N , N 0 M 1 T 0<br />

• E M A I L L S C o m m u n i t y A s s o c @ g m a i l . c o m<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!