View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– 2 – January 11, 2013<br />
a) a maximum fence height <strong>of</strong> 3.66 metres in the interior side and rear<br />
yards, whereas the maximum height permitted is 2 meters; and<br />
b) a maximum fence height <strong>of</strong> 2.74 metres in the front yard whereas the<br />
maximum height permitted is 0.91 metres were refused .<br />
<strong>The</strong> reasons were stated and the information regarding appealing the<br />
decision to the Ontario Municipal Board was given with the last date for<br />
an appeal being March 14th, 2012. <strong>The</strong>re was no appeal made to the<br />
O.M.B.<br />
An inquiry elicited the following information: “Carol McKenzie<br />
confirmed that a letter has been sent to the Misselbrook’s requiring<br />
them to bring the fences and gates at 11 and 13 Woodward St. into<br />
compliance with the Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment ruling this past winter.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y have been given a timeline to comply that is usually prescribed<br />
by the courts before action is taken (around two weeks) and have been<br />
notified that if the fences and gates are not in compliance by the<br />
demand date then by-law enforcement will charge them.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> letter was sent out about July 9 th.<br />
It has come to our attention that the owners <strong>of</strong> 11 and 13 Woodward St.,<br />
still have not complied with the order. LSCA is deeply concerned that<br />
by-law enforcement is not happening. This is another example <strong>of</strong> the<br />
apparent incompetence or unwillingness <strong>of</strong> current by-law enforcement to<br />
do its job.<br />
If Council fails to ensure that by-laws are NOT being enforced it is our<br />
determination that the <strong>Municipality</strong> may have liability issues.<br />
Certainly, if any resulting fines are not a large enough deterrent<br />
Council needs to rethink its approach to all by-law enforcement issues.<br />
Council may also find itself with more by-law battles if enforcement<br />
does not follow through.<br />
If actions set in motion by the Short Tern Rental Committee and Council<br />
have no follow through, there can be no confidence that Council or Bylaws<br />
have any teeth.<br />
<strong>The</strong> LSCA is asking Council to enforce its by-laws as requested by the<br />
Plan 24 Committee and the <strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association.<br />
I trust we will hear back from the <strong>Municipality</strong> on this matter as soon<br />
as possible.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Sharon Weitzel per<br />
<strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association<br />
35