26.04.2014 Views

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

View - The Municipality of Lambton Shores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 2 – January 11, 2013<br />

a) a maximum fence height <strong>of</strong> 3.66 metres in the interior side and rear<br />

yards, whereas the maximum height permitted is 2 meters; and<br />

b) a maximum fence height <strong>of</strong> 2.74 metres in the front yard whereas the<br />

maximum height permitted is 0.91 metres were refused .<br />

<strong>The</strong> reasons were stated and the information regarding appealing the<br />

decision to the Ontario Municipal Board was given with the last date for<br />

an appeal being March 14th, 2012. <strong>The</strong>re was no appeal made to the<br />

O.M.B.<br />

An inquiry elicited the following information: “Carol McKenzie<br />

confirmed that a letter has been sent to the Misselbrook’s requiring<br />

them to bring the fences and gates at 11 and 13 Woodward St. into<br />

compliance with the Committee <strong>of</strong> Adjustment ruling this past winter.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y have been given a timeline to comply that is usually prescribed<br />

by the courts before action is taken (around two weeks) and have been<br />

notified that if the fences and gates are not in compliance by the<br />

demand date then by-law enforcement will charge them.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> letter was sent out about July 9 th.<br />

It has come to our attention that the owners <strong>of</strong> 11 and 13 Woodward St.,<br />

still have not complied with the order. LSCA is deeply concerned that<br />

by-law enforcement is not happening. This is another example <strong>of</strong> the<br />

apparent incompetence or unwillingness <strong>of</strong> current by-law enforcement to<br />

do its job.<br />

If Council fails to ensure that by-laws are NOT being enforced it is our<br />

determination that the <strong>Municipality</strong> may have liability issues.<br />

Certainly, if any resulting fines are not a large enough deterrent<br />

Council needs to rethink its approach to all by-law enforcement issues.<br />

Council may also find itself with more by-law battles if enforcement<br />

does not follow through.<br />

If actions set in motion by the Short Tern Rental Committee and Council<br />

have no follow through, there can be no confidence that Council or Bylaws<br />

have any teeth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> LSCA is asking Council to enforce its by-laws as requested by the<br />

Plan 24 Committee and the <strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association.<br />

I trust we will hear back from the <strong>Municipality</strong> on this matter as soon<br />

as possible.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Sharon Weitzel per<br />

<strong>Lambton</strong> <strong>Shores</strong> Community Association<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!