Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>safety</strong>: a road <strong>safety</strong> manual for decision-makers and practitioners<br />
BOX 5.1: <strong>Pedestrian</strong> overpass on a major highway in Kampala, Uganda<br />
Over 40% of people killed in road traffic crashes in<br />
Uganda in 2010 were pedestrians (2). Though walking<br />
is a dominant mode of transport in most African<br />
countries, road infrastructure facilities for pedestrians<br />
are generally inadequate or underdeveloped in<br />
both urban and rural areas (3,4).<br />
In an effort to address the <strong>safety</strong> of pedestrians, an<br />
overpass costing approximately US$ 100 000 was<br />
constructed at Nakawa Trading Centre, approximately<br />
six kilometres from Kampala city centre (5). This<br />
busy trading centre with many small retail shops,<br />
industries, a sports stadium, offices, low-cost residential<br />
estates and schools is on the Kampala–Jinja<br />
highway. The overpass was built in August 1998,<br />
when there was a heightened sense of the importance<br />
of road <strong>safety</strong> because the <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Act<br />
had just been enacted and several crashes at the<br />
location provoked public outrage.<br />
An evaluation of the overpass conducted in 2002<br />
revealed the following results (5):<br />
• Just over one third of pedestrians used the<br />
overpass. Users were mostly female (49%) and<br />
children (79%). The low usage of the overpass<br />
reflected some of the design flaws, as well as the<br />
position of the overpass, which raised security<br />
concerns among users. Respondents were concerned<br />
that the overpass was untidy, poorly lit<br />
and that children loitered on it. Most pedestrians<br />
found the overpass to be inconvenient and difficult<br />
to access. Consequently, many pedestrians could<br />
be seen crossing the road through motorized traffic.<br />
No changes appeared to have been made to<br />
the overpass by July 2012.<br />
• While the number of pedestrians killed dropped<br />
from eight to two after it was constructed, the<br />
number of pedestrians seriously injured increased<br />
from 14 before construction to 17 afterwards.<br />
The mixed outcomes associated with this isolated<br />
intervention indicate the need for a comprehensive<br />
approach to pedestrian <strong>safety</strong>. Other measures such<br />
as reducing and enforcing vehicle speeds, providing<br />
raised crossings, providing sidewalks and raising<br />
awareness about these measures would have complemented<br />
the overpass.<br />
©2012 Olive Kobusingye<br />
5: Evaluating pedestrian <strong>safety</strong> programmes<br />
99