Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership

Why is addressing pedestrian safety necessary?
50. Tefft. B. Impact speed and a pedestrian’s risk of severe injury or death. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013,
50: 871–878.
51. Vasconcellos, EA. Road safety impacts of the motorcycle in Brazil. International Journal of Injury Control and
Safety Promotion, 2012, 1–8.
52. McLean AJ, et.al. Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian collisions (Vol. 1). Canberra, Federal
Office of Road Safety, 1994 (CR 146).
53. Davis GA. Relating severity of pedestrian injury to impact speed in vehicle pedestrian crashes. Transportation
Research Record, 2001, 1773: 108–113.
54. Rosén E, Stigson H, Sander U. Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.
Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43: 25–33.
55. Pasanen E. Ajonopeudet ja jalankulkijan turvallisuus [Driving speeds and pedestrian safety]. Espoo, Teknillinen
korkeakoulu, Liikennetekniikka, 1991.
56. Drinking and driving: a road safety manual for decision-makers. Geneva, Global Road Safety Partnership, 2007.
57. Stübig T, et al. Alcohol intoxication in road traffic accidents leads to higher impact speed difference, higher
ISS and MAIS, and higher preclinical mortality. Alcohol, 2012, 46: 681–686.
58. Phillips DP, Brewer KM. The relationship between serious injury and blood alcohol concentration (BAC)
in fatal motor vehicle accidents: BAC=0.01% is associated with significantly more dangerous accidents than
BAC=0.00%. Addiction, 2011, 106: 1614–1622.
59. Cairney P, et al. Preventing crashes involving intoxicated pedestrians. Sydney, AustRoads, 2004.
60. Odero W. Alcohol-related road traffic injuries in Eldoret, Kenya. East African Medical Journal, 1998, 75:
708–711.
61. Donson H. A profile of fatal injuries in South Africa 2008: Annual report for South Africa based on the National
Injury Mortality Surveillance System, Johannesburg, Medical Research Council, 2009.
62. Tiwari G. Reducing pedestrian risk at junctions. In: Volvo Research and Educational Foundations, ed. 10 years
with the FUT programme. Goteborg, Volvo Research and Educational Foundations, 2011: 126–135.
63. Ewing R, Dumbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety: a review of empirical evidence. Journal of
Planning Literature, 2009, 23: 347–367.
64. Sleet DA, Naumann RB, Rudd RA. Injuries and the built environment. In: Dannenberg AL et al. eds. Making
healthy places: designing and building for health, well-being and sustainability. Washington, DC, Island Press,
2011: 77–79.
65. Hatfield J et al. Misunderstanding of right-of-way rules at various pedestrian crossing types: observational
study and survey. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007, 39: 833–842.
66. Schwebel DC, et al. Distraction and pedestrian safety: How talking on the phone, texting, and listening to
music impact crossing the street. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012,45: 266–271.
67. Mobile phone use: a growing problem of driver distraction. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011.
68. Bungum TJ, Day C, Henry LJ. The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted
crosswalk. Journal of Community Health, 2005,30: 269–279.
69. Hatfield J, Murphy S. The effect of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and
unsignalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007: 197–205.
70. Nasar J, Hecht P, Werner R. Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis
& Prevention, 2008,40: 69–75.
71. Stavrinos D, Byington KW, Schwebel DC. The effects of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury
risk. Pediatrics, 2009,123: e179–e185.
72. Stavrinos D, Byington KW, Schwebel DC. Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college
pedestrians. Journal of Safety Research, 2011,42: 101–107.
24