Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>safety</strong>: a road <strong>safety</strong> manual for decision-makers and practitioners<br />
Although signalized intersections appear to be safer for pedestrians than<br />
uncontrolled intersections, they are still dangerous environments for pedestrians. A<br />
major issue at signalized intersections is the conflict between left- or right-turning<br />
vehicles, which require a larger turning radius, as well as the fact that crossing<br />
pedestrians, may be obscured from the driver’s view. The length of time allowed<br />
for pedestrians to complete crossing is also a factor. Though motorists are required<br />
to give priority to pedestrians at signalized intersections, vehicles sometimes start<br />
turning while pedestrians are still crossing (41).<br />
A pedestrian crossing is a point on a road where pedestrians traverse<br />
the road. <strong>Pedestrian</strong> crossings, sometimes referred to as crosswalks,<br />
may be found at intersections or along road stretches. Marked crossings are<br />
designated by markings on the road, commonly white stripes. Signalized crossings<br />
include automatic traffic signals that indicate to pedestrians when they<br />
should cross.<br />
2: <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>safety</strong> in roadway design and land-use planning<br />
Evidence to date indicates that marked pedestrian crossings should not be<br />
implemented without additional <strong>safety</strong> measures. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s may falsely believe they<br />
are safer – that motorists are more likely to see them and stop – at marked pedestrian<br />
crossings, and therefore attempt crossing without due caution increasing their<br />
chance of being hit by a motor vehicle (42). A study of 1000 marked crossings and<br />
1000 unmarked comparison sites, all at uncontrolled crossings, found no significant<br />
difference in <strong>safety</strong> performance unless additional <strong>safety</strong> features such as automatic<br />
signals were used (43). This study also found that on multi-lane roads carrying over<br />
12 000 vehicles per day, a marked crossing was more likely to increase pedestrian<br />
risk compared to a similar unmarked crossing, unless <strong>safety</strong> features such as raised<br />
median refuge islands or pedestrian beacons were also installed. On multi-lane roads<br />
carrying over 15 000 vehicles per day, marked crossings were more likely to increase<br />
pedestrian risk even if raised median refuges were provided (43).<br />
2.1.4 High traffic volume roads<br />
<strong>Road</strong> environments with high traffic volume and inadequate attention to pedestrian<br />
<strong>safety</strong> have been found to exacerbate pedestrian collisions. One study in Ontario,<br />
Canada, found that the probability of a pedestrian collision with a left-turning<br />
vehicle was influenced by traffic volume (44), while another in a town in China<br />
found that high volumes of traffic, the presence of bus stops and high volumes of<br />
pedestrians crossing all led to increased collision risk for pedestrians (45).<br />
33