17.05.2014 Views

Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership

Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership

Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>safety</strong>: a road <strong>safety</strong> manual for decision-makers and practitioners<br />

Although signalized intersections appear to be safer for pedestrians than<br />

uncontrolled intersections, they are still dangerous environments for pedestrians. A<br />

major issue at signalized intersections is the conflict between left- or right-turning<br />

vehicles, which require a larger turning radius, as well as the fact that crossing<br />

pedestrians, may be obscured from the driver’s view. The length of time allowed<br />

for pedestrians to complete crossing is also a factor. Though motorists are required<br />

to give priority to pedestrians at signalized intersections, vehicles sometimes start<br />

turning while pedestrians are still crossing (41).<br />

A pedestrian crossing is a point on a road where pedestrians traverse<br />

the road. <strong>Pedestrian</strong> crossings, sometimes referred to as crosswalks,<br />

may be found at intersections or along road stretches. Marked crossings are<br />

designated by markings on the road, commonly white stripes. Signalized crossings<br />

include automatic traffic signals that indicate to pedestrians when they<br />

should cross.<br />

2: <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>safety</strong> in roadway design and land-use planning<br />

Evidence to date indicates that marked pedestrian crossings should not be<br />

implemented without additional <strong>safety</strong> measures. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s may falsely believe they<br />

are safer – that motorists are more likely to see them and stop – at marked pedestrian<br />

crossings, and therefore attempt crossing without due caution increasing their<br />

chance of being hit by a motor vehicle (42). A study of 1000 marked crossings and<br />

1000 unmarked comparison sites, all at uncontrolled crossings, found no significant<br />

difference in <strong>safety</strong> performance unless additional <strong>safety</strong> features such as automatic<br />

signals were used (43). This study also found that on multi-lane roads carrying over<br />

12 000 vehicles per day, a marked crossing was more likely to increase pedestrian<br />

risk compared to a similar unmarked crossing, unless <strong>safety</strong> features such as raised<br />

median refuge islands or pedestrian beacons were also installed. On multi-lane roads<br />

carrying over 15 000 vehicles per day, marked crossings were more likely to increase<br />

pedestrian risk even if raised median refuges were provided (43).<br />

2.1.4 High traffic volume roads<br />

<strong>Road</strong> environments with high traffic volume and inadequate attention to pedestrian<br />

<strong>safety</strong> have been found to exacerbate pedestrian collisions. One study in Ontario,<br />

Canada, found that the probability of a pedestrian collision with a left-turning<br />

vehicle was influenced by traffic volume (44), while another in a town in China<br />

found that high volumes of traffic, the presence of bus stops and high volumes of<br />

pedestrians crossing all led to increased collision risk for pedestrians (45).<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!