Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
Pedestrian safety - Global Road Safety Partnership
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evaluating pedestrian <strong>safety</strong> programmes<br />
How groups advocate depends partly upon the personal styles and skills of their<br />
leaders, as well as their political connections. Whatever the skills and strengths of<br />
the core group, the following six principles apply to most pedestrian <strong>safety</strong> advocacy<br />
efforts (8,10):<br />
1. Make a long-term commitment: Change is rarely achieved overnight, and<br />
even in the best-performing countries it has taken years to achieve a decrease in<br />
pedestrian traffic fatalities. Advocacy for policy change on behalf of pedestrian <strong>safety</strong><br />
entails seemingly endless hours of effort, including service on advisory committees,<br />
tracking and evaluating projects and plans, providing comments and testimony,<br />
and advocating for changes to standard operating procedures such as street design<br />
standards and crossing marking policies. Persistence and commitment in the long<br />
term are required for success.<br />
2. Prioritize focal areas: Take a strategic approach by identifying and focusing on<br />
a few key priorities at once. Setting priority areas requires a good assessment of the<br />
road <strong>safety</strong> and political situation in the local setting (see Module 3). Instead of<br />
engaging in a broad range of activities that may not always yield results, it is better<br />
to target advocacy efforts carefully, to make the best use of the limited time and<br />
resources, in favour of the greatest potential gains. Advocacy groups must be realistic<br />
about what their staff and partners can achieve, and take on a limited number of<br />
projects each year, especially in the first years of operation.<br />
3. Promote evidence-based solutions: It is critical to ensure that efforts are based<br />
on the best scientific evidence. Nongovernmental organizations should engage in<br />
an ongoing dialogue with road <strong>safety</strong> experts in order to stay informed about the<br />
latest knowledge and practice from the field and use that understanding to enhance<br />
ongoing research and activities. In certain settings, the best scientific evidence may<br />
contradict the common understanding, and nongovernmental organizations can play<br />
a role in resolving this conflict.<br />
4. Utilize existing resources: It is helpful to make use of existing materials and<br />
resources in order to avoid duplication of effort. Many organizations offer materials<br />
that can be used to support national and local road <strong>safety</strong> initiatives. These should be<br />
tailored for relevant audiences and translated into appropriate languages.<br />
5. Build an advocacy network: It is vital to engage with partners. Few nongovernmental<br />
organizations are able to succeed without the support of partners from<br />
government, academia, the private sector, foundations or agencies such as the police,<br />
fire department and medical services. They also gain by reaching out to other nongovernmental<br />
organizations to coordinate messages, support one another’s activities<br />
and generate resources. The importance of engaging with partners, promoting similar<br />
actions and speaking as a community with one voice cannot be overstated.<br />
6. Review progress regularly: While most advocacy efforts contribute to general<br />
awareness raising, targeted advocacy can most effectively contribute to concrete<br />
and measurable change. Even when an organization lacks the capacity to monitor<br />
104