Report: The State of Preschool 2008: State Preschool Yearbook

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STATE MONITORING What program records are reviewed for monitoring purposes? Nevada New Jersey Abbott New Jersey ECPA New Jersey ELLI New Mexico Program financial records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other records are reviewed, such as assessment data, progress towards meeting outcome indicators and objectives Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other program records are reviewed, CYFD programs are monitored by the Child Care Licensing Bureau for compliance with Child Care Facilities Regulations New York Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other program records are reviewed, each school district superintendent must sign a Statement of Assurances attesting to compliance and program quality requirements North Carolina Ohio ECE Ohio ELI Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania EABG Pennsylvania HSSAP Pennsylvania K4 PA Pre-K Counts South Carolina 4K South Carolina CDEPP Tennessee Texas Vermont Act 62 Vermont EEI Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin 4K Wisconsin HdSt Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other program records are reviewed, overall adherence to program standards (e.g., class size, adult to child ratio, etc.) Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other program records are reviewed, family and health records None Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records NA Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records None Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records NA NA Other records are reviewed, such as budgets that pertain to EEI, student assessment results, program summary Program financial records, Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records Program safety records, Staff records and documentation, Child administrative records, Classroom records, Other program records are reviewed, policies, family support contact records, child health coordination records None None None 214 Footnotes are grouped by state at the end of Appendix A. All data are for the ‘07-’08 school year, unless otherwise noted.
STATE MONITORING How is information collected through monitoring used for program improvement? Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring, Other purposes Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, to guide CDE staff services and support visits Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Florida Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance, Mentoring 15 Georgia Illinois Iowa Shared Visions Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development Iowa SVPP Other purposes 19 Kansas Other purposes 12 Kentucky Louisiana 8(g) Louisiana LA4 Louisiana NSECD Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota HdSt Missouri Nebraska Teacher professional development, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring, Special education technical assistance Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Technical assistance Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Mentoring Teacher professional development, Technical assistance Technical assistance, LEAs are required to keep and review program records, To validate programmatic information from master plan updates and compliance with regulations Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, To inform future grant awards Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Adjustments to curricula, Technical assistance, Annual program goals 24 Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance Teacher professional development, Corrective actions/sanctions, Funding decisions about programs, Technical assistance Footnotes are grouped by state at the end of Appendix A. All data are for the ‘07-’08 school year, unless otherwise noted. 215
Page 1 and 2:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR EARLY EDUCAT
Page 3 and 4:
THE STATE OF PRESCHOOL 2008 STATE P
Page 5 and 6:
Nebraska ..........................
Page 7 and 8:
NATIONAL ACCESS Total state program
Page 9 and 10:
STATE-FUNDED PRESCHOOL EDUCATION: P
Page 11 and 12:
SHADOWS OF THINGS THAT MAY BE As st
Page 13 and 14:
QUALITY STANDARDS: MEETING GREAT EX
Page 15 and 16:
RESOURCES: HARD TIMES AHEAD? During
Page 17 and 18:
TABLE 2: PRE-K ACCESS BY STATE ACCE
Page 19 and 20:
TABLE 4: 2007-2008 ENROLLMENT OF 3-
Page 21 and 22:
TABLE 6: RANKINGS OF PRE-K RESOURCE
Page 23 and 24:
WHAT QUALIFIES AS A STATE PRESCHOOL
Page 25 and 26:
The sections below provide an overv
Page 27 and 28:
Early learning standards are also c
Page 29 and 30:
ACCESS Total state program enrollme
Page 32 and 33:
PERCENT OF STATE POPULATION ENROLLE
Page 34 and 35:
NO PROGRAM laska has provided a sup
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
NO PROGRAM awaii does not have a st
Page 54 and 55:
NO PROGRAM ACCESS RANKINGS 4-YEAR-O
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
IOWA SHARED VISIONS ACCESS Total st
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
LOUISIANA 8(g) STUDENT ENHANCEMENT
Page 72:
LOUISIANA NONPUBLIC SCHOOLS EARLY C
Page 75 and 76:
MAINE PUBLIC PRESCHOOL PROGRAM ACCE
Page 77 and 78:
MARYLAND PREKINDERGARTEN PROGRAM AC
Page 79 and 80:
MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERG
Page 81 and 82:
MICHIGAN SCHOOL READINESS PROGRAM A
Page 83 and 84:
MINNESOTA HEAD START ACCESS Total s
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
MISSOURI PRESCHOOL PROJECT ACCESS T
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
NEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
Page 93 and 94:
NEVADA STATE PREKINDERGARTEN EDUCAT
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
STATE OVERVIEW Total state program
Page 99 and 100:
NEW JERSEY NON-ABBOTT EARLY CHILDHO
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
OHIO EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ACCE
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILI
Page 122 and 123:
PENNSYLVANIA HEAD START SUPPLEMENTA
Page 124 and 125:
NO PROGRAM uring the 2007-2008 scho
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
SOUTH CAROLINA HALF-DAY CHILD DEVEL
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
VERMONT PREKINDERGARTEN EDUCATION -
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
WISCONSIN FOUR-YEAR-OLD KINDERGARTE
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
METHODOLOGY The data in this report
Page 156 and 157:
In the 2008 Yearbook, we attempt to
Page 158 and 159:
APPENDIX A: STATE SURVEY DATA 2007-
Page 160 and 161:
STATE ACCESS Number of children in
Page 162 and 163:
STATE ACCESS Are children receiving
Page 164 and 165:
STATE ACCESS Program enrollment - F
Page 166 and 167: STATE OPERATING SCHEDULE Minimum op
Page 168 and 169: STATE AGE ELIGIBILITY Minimum age f
Page 170 and 171: STATE AGE ELIGIBILITY State policy
Page 172 and 173: STATE INCOME REQUIREMENT Income req
Page 174 and 175: STATE OTHER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT
Page 176 and 177: STATE OTHER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT
Page 178 and 179: STATE PROGRAM STANDARDS Maximum cla
Page 180 and 181: STATE PROGRAM STANDARDS Support ser
Page 182 and 183: STATE PROGRAM STANDARDS Support ser
Page 184 and 185: STATE PROGRAM STANDARDS Alabama 2 N
Page 186 and 187: STATE STATEWIDE EARLY LEARNING STAN
Page 192 and 193: STATE PERSONNEL Minimum teacher deg
Page 194 and 195: STATE PERSONNEL Education level of
Page 196 and 197: STATE PERSONNEL Assistant teacher i
Page 198 and 199: STATE PERSONNEL State supports for
Page 200 and 201: STATE RESOURCES State funding sourc
Page 202 and 203: STATE RESOURCES Required local fund
Page 204 and 205: STATE RESOURCES Agencies eligible t
Page 206 and 207: STATE RESOURCES Is there a percenta
Page 208 and 209: STATE RESOURCES Are per-child/per-c
Page 210 and 211: STATE RESOURCES Can a child be fund
Page 212 and 213: STATE MONITORING Information collec
Page 214 and 215: STATE MONITORING How is monitoring
Page 218 and 219: STATE MONITORING How is information
Page 220 and 221: STATE Alabama Yes Specific assessme
Page 222 and 223: STATE MONITORING Required kindergar
Page 224 and 225: 14 Children are assessed at three d
Page 226 and 227: DELAWARE - Early Childhood Assistan
Page 228 and 229: 3 Kansas began a pre-K pilot that s
Page 230 and 231: 7 While not required, most programs
Page 232 and 233: 19 The formula uses free lunch and
Page 234 and 235: 18 Evaluation of program-level outc
Page 236 and 237: 13 The state allocates the same amo
Page 238 and 239: 11 Beginning in 2009-2010, assistan
Page 240 and 241: 20 The Office of Early Learning (OE
Page 242 and 243: WEST VIRGINIA - West Virginia Unive
Page 244 and 245: APPENDIX B: HEAD START DATA (contin
Page 246 and 247: APPENDIX C: CHILD CARE DATA STATE I
Page 248 and 249: APPENDIX C: CHILD CARE DATA (contin
Page 250 and 251: APPENDIX C: CHILD CARE DATA (contin
Page 252 and 253: APPENDIX E: PRE-K SPECIAL EDUCATION
Page 254: ISBN 0-9749910-5-8 $59.95
show all

Report: The State of Preschool 2008: State Preschool Yearbook

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?