22.05.2014 Views

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 Chapter 4. Statistical and probability foundations<br />

The continuously-compounded return r t<br />

( k)<br />

is the sum of k continuously-compounded 1-day<br />

returns. To see this we use the relation r t<br />

( k) = ln [ 1+<br />

R t<br />

( k)<br />

] . The return r t<br />

( k)<br />

can then be<br />

written as<br />

[4.7]<br />

r t<br />

( k) = ln [ 1+<br />

R t<br />

( k)<br />

]<br />

= ln [ ( 1 + R t<br />

) ⋅ ( 1+<br />

R ) 1 R t – 1<br />

⋅ ( + t – k –<br />

)]<br />

1<br />

= r t<br />

+ r t – 1<br />

+ … + r t k<br />

– + 1<br />

Notice from Eq. [4.7] that compounding, a multiplicative operation, is converted to an additive<br />

operation by taking logarithms. Therefore, multiple day returns based on continuous compounding<br />

are simple sums of one-day returns.<br />

As an example of how 1-day returns are used to generate a multiple-day return, we use a 1-month<br />

period, defined by RiskMetrics as having 25 business days. Working with log price changes, the<br />

continuously compounded return over one month is given by<br />

[4.8]<br />

r t<br />

( 25) = r t<br />

+ r t – 1<br />

+ … + r t – 24<br />

That is, the 1-month return is the sum of the last 25 1-day returns.<br />

4.1.3 Percent and continuous compounding in aggregating returns<br />

When deciding whether to work with percent or continuously compounded returns it is important<br />

to understand how such returns aggregate both across time and across individual returns at any<br />

point in time.<br />

In the preceding section we showed how multiple-day returns can be constructed from 1-day<br />

returns by aggregating the latter across time. This is known as temporal aggregation. However,<br />

there is another type of aggregation known as cross-section aggregation. In the latter approach,<br />

aggregation is across individual returns (each corresponding to a specific instrument) at a particular<br />

point in time. For example, consider a portfolio that consists of three instruments. Let r i<br />

and<br />

R i<br />

( i = 123 , , ) be the continuously compounded and percent returns, respectively and let w i<br />

represent the portfolio weights. (The parameter w i<br />

represents the fraction of the total portfolio<br />

value allocated to the ith instrument with the condition that—assuming no short positions—<br />

w 1<br />

+ w 2<br />

+ w 3<br />

= 1). If the initial value of this portfolio is P 0<br />

the price of the portfolio one period<br />

later with continuously compounded returns is<br />

[4.9] P 1<br />

w 1<br />

P 0<br />

e r 1<br />

⋅ ⋅ w 2<br />

P 0<br />

e r 2<br />

⋅ ⋅ w 3<br />

P 0<br />

e r 3<br />

=<br />

+ + ⋅ ⋅<br />

⎛P 1<br />

⎞<br />

Solving Eq. [4.9] for the portfolio return, r p<br />

= ln⎜-----<br />

⎟ , we get<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

⎛<br />

[4.10] r p<br />

w 1<br />

e r 1<br />

⋅ w 2<br />

e r 2<br />

⋅ w 3<br />

e r 3⎞<br />

= ln⎝<br />

+ + ⋅ ⎠<br />

The price of the portfolio one period later with discrete compounding, i.e., using percent returns, is<br />

P 0<br />

[4.11]<br />

P 1<br />

= w 1<br />

⋅ P 0<br />

⋅ ( 1 + r 1<br />

) + w 2<br />

⋅ P 0<br />

⋅ ( 1+<br />

r 2<br />

) + w 3<br />

⋅ P 0<br />

⋅ ( 1+<br />

r 3<br />

)<br />

( P<br />

The percent portfolio return, R 1<br />

– P 0<br />

)<br />

p<br />

= ------------------------ , is given by<br />

P 0<br />

[4.12]<br />

R p<br />

= w 1<br />

⋅ r 1<br />

+ w 2<br />

⋅ r 2<br />

+ w 3<br />

⋅ r 3<br />

RiskMetrics —Technical <strong>Document</strong><br />

Fourth Edition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!