22.05.2014 Views

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

RiskMetrics™ —Technical Document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 Chapter 5. Estimation and forecast<br />

Academic research has compared the forecasting ability of implied and historical volatility models.<br />

The evidence of the superior forecasting ability of historical volatility over implied volatility<br />

is mixed, depending on the time series considered. For example, Xu and Taylor (1995, p. 804) note<br />

that, “prior research concludes that volatility predictors calculated from options prices are better<br />

predictors of future volatility than standard deviations calculated from historical asset price data.”<br />

Kroner, Kneafsey and Claessens (1995, p. 9), on the other hand, note that researchers are beginning<br />

to conclude that GARCH (historical based) forecasts outperform implied volatility forecasts.<br />

Since implied standard deviation captures market expectations and pure time series models rely<br />

solely on past information, these models can be combined to forecast the standard deviation of<br />

returns.<br />

5.2 RiskMetrics forecasting methodology<br />

RiskMetrics uses the exponentially weighted moving average model (EWMA) to forecast variances<br />

and covariances (volatilities and correlations) of the multivariate normal distribution. This<br />

approach is just as simple, yet an improvement over the traditional volatility forecasting method<br />

that relies on moving averages with fixed, equal weights. This latter method is referred to as the<br />

simple moving average (SMA) model.<br />

5.2.1 Volatility estimation and forecasting 1<br />

One way to capture the dynamic features of volatility is to use an exponential moving average of<br />

historical observations where the latest observations carry the highest weight in the volatility estimate.<br />

This approach has two important advantages over the equally weighted model. First, volatility<br />

reacts faster to shocks in the market as recent data carry more weight than data in the distant<br />

past. Second, following a shock (a large return), the volatility declines exponentially as the weight<br />

of the shock observation falls. In contrast, the use of a simple moving average leads to relatively<br />

abrupt changes in the standard deviation once the shock falls out of the measurement sample,<br />

which, in most cases, can be several months after it occurs.<br />

For a given set of T returns, Table 5.1 presents the formulae used to compute the equally and exponentially<br />

weighted (standard deviation) volatility.<br />

Table 5.1<br />

Volatility estimators*<br />

Equally weighted<br />

Exponentially weighted<br />

T<br />

∑<br />

1<br />

σ= -- ( r<br />

T t<br />

– r ) 2<br />

σ = ( 1 – λ) λ t – 1<br />

( r t<br />

– r) 2<br />

t = 1<br />

* In writing the volatility estimators we intentionally do not use time<br />

subscripts.<br />

T<br />

∑<br />

t = 1<br />

In comparing the two estimators (equal and exponential), notice that the exponentially weighted<br />

moving average model depends on the parameter λ (0 < λ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!