24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 Coupled quantum dots in a <strong>phonon</strong> cavity<br />

onset of higher subb<strong>and</strong>s. In the vertical configuration the jumps of the DOS also<br />

appear in the inelastic rate whereas for the lateral orientation continuous cusps<br />

are seen only. Although the microscopic <strong>coupling</strong> between <strong>electron</strong>s <strong>and</strong> confined<br />

<strong>phonon</strong>s is the same in both configurations, the effect on the DQD depends on<br />

the orientation. Apart from the modes that lead to van–Hove singularities, the<br />

subb<strong>and</strong> minimum is at q ‖ = 0. These modes correspond to non-propagating excitations<br />

of the elastic medium which nevertheless lead to displacement patterns<br />

with a non-vanishing local change in volume, <strong>and</strong> thus induce a DP potential. In<br />

contrast to the vertical configuration, the lateral setup with both dots in the middle<br />

of the cavity (Θ = 0) is not sensitive to non-propagating excitations because the<br />

displacement for such modes is constant at the locations of the dots; only propagating<br />

modes lead to a finite phase shift in the interaction potentials between the<br />

dots <strong>and</strong> thus affect the transport.<br />

Although being of minor relevance in small FSQWs, the PZ <strong>coupling</strong> also<br />

contributes to the inelastic <strong>scattering</strong> rate. The orientation dependence <strong>and</strong> the<br />

corresponding de<strong>coupling</strong> of individual Lamb modes is reversed as compared to<br />

the DP case, see Eq. (6.24).<br />

6.2.3 Discussion<br />

From the inelastic rates, which are shown in Fig. 6.3, for the example of DP<br />

<strong>electron</strong>-confined <strong>phonon</strong> interaction, we can see that in addition to the generic<br />

subb<strong>and</strong> quantisation also the van–Hove singularities of the <strong>phonon</strong> DOS show<br />

up in the current through the DQD, acting as clear fingerprints of <strong>phonon</strong> confinement.<br />

Close to the singularity, the application of the perturbative derivation which<br />

led to the inelastic rate for weak <strong>electron</strong>-<strong>phonon</strong> <strong>coupling</strong>, Eqs. (6.15) <strong>and</strong> (6.16),<br />

is questionable. However, led by the numerical results for the <strong>phonon</strong> DOS, we<br />

can investigate the influence of the van–Hove singularity in a non-perturbative<br />

way by decomposing the <strong>phonon</strong> spectral density (6.16) to find an approximate<br />

analytical model<br />

ρ eff (ω) = ρ Ohm + ρ 0 δ(ω − ω v ), (6.25)<br />

consisting of a van–Hove singularity at ω v <strong>and</strong> a background of lower order<br />

subb<strong>and</strong>s which are assumed to form an ohmic bath. Following Ref. [149], the<br />

inelastic current at zero temperature can be written as<br />

I inel ≈ 2πT 2<br />

c ∑<br />

n<br />

w n δ(ω − nω v ). (6.26)<br />

Thus, in addition to the main peak a ω v , the van–Hove singularity leads to<br />

non-perturbative satellite peaks at harmonics of the frequency ω v with oscillator

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!