Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 Rashba spin-<strong>orbit</strong> <strong>coupling</strong> in quantum dots<br />
For zero detuning we find Ω = Ω 0 := ˜λ 2 . In quantum optics Ω 0 is called Rabi<br />
frequency. It describes the periodic energy exchange between an atomic pseudospin<br />
<strong>and</strong> the resonant radiation field. In our model we will call the frequency of<br />
CO Rabi frequency – even for finite detuning.<br />
From Eq. (3.34) we see that the frequency of oscillation is only determined<br />
by the <strong>coupling</strong> strength which is present during the coherent evolution (˜λ 2 ). The<br />
amplitude of oscillation, however, depends on the ratio ˜λ 1 /˜λ 2 <strong>and</strong> the detuning δ.<br />
In Eq. (3.33) completeness yields<br />
c 2 + + c 2 − = cos 2 ∆θ + + cos 2 ∆θ − = 1. (3.35)<br />
The maximum amplitude in P(t p ) is found for t p such that exp(−2iΩt p ) = −1,<br />
leading to<br />
P max = 1 − |cos 2 ∆θ + − cos 2 ∆θ − | 2 . (3.36)<br />
If cos 2 ∆θ ± ≈ 1/2 we expect probability oscillations of order 100%. To translate<br />
this into a condition for δ, ˜λ 1 <strong>and</strong> ˜λ 2 we express<br />
leading to<br />
tanθ ± α 1 ,α 2<br />
=: χ ± 1,2 , (3.37)<br />
∆θ ± = arctanχ ± 2 − arctanχ− 1<br />
(3.38)<br />
= arctan χ± 2 − χ− 1<br />
1 + χ ± 2 χ− 1<br />
=: arctanγ ± , (3.39)<br />
by using Eq. (4.4.34) in Ref. [130]. To find probability oscillation of ≈ 100% we<br />
need<br />
c 2 ± ≈ 1 2 ⇒ ∆θ ≈ ± { 1<br />
4 π, 5 4 π }<br />
⇒ γ ≈ ±1. (3.40)<br />
Trivially, we have γ ≈ ±1 in the limit<br />
˜λ 1 ≪ δ ≪ ˜λ 2 ⇒ P(t p ) ≈ cos 2 Ωt p , (3.41)<br />
corresponding to CO in the resonant JCM limit in quantum optics. However,<br />
for the QD condition (3.41) corresponds to the limit of non-adiabatic switching<br />
between almost zero <strong>and</strong> strong SO <strong>coupling</strong>. Unfortunately, in real physical systems<br />
this limit is unlikely to be fulfilled. Thus, in contrast to optical systems,<br />
only probability oscillations with amplitudes less than 100% are feasible in SOinteracting<br />
QDs.