24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 Spectral properties, various limits 27<br />

2.2 Spectral properties, various limits<br />

Geometrical confinement leads to quantisation of the <strong>orbit</strong>al motion. Therefore,<br />

the natural language to describe the wavefunction in a quasi-1D <strong>electron</strong> system is<br />

in terms of confined transverse subb<strong>and</strong>s. In Sec. 2.1.2, the effective mass Hamiltonian<br />

of the spin-<strong>orbit</strong> (SO) interacting quantum wire (QWR) [Eq. (2.1) on page<br />

18] is rewritten in the basis of transverse subb<strong>and</strong>s corresponding to parabolic<br />

confinement. Formally, this leads to a bosonic representation [Eq. (2.5) on page<br />

19] in which the SO interaction leads to a <strong>coupling</strong> between nearest-neighbouring<br />

subb<strong>and</strong>s of opposite spin, see Fig. 2.2a. In Eq. (2.5) the operators a † k <strong>and</strong> a k<br />

act on the transverse eigenstates such that a † k a k gives the subb<strong>and</strong> number of the<br />

<strong>electron</strong> that propagates with longitudinal momentum k. Clearly, <strong>electron</strong>s are<br />

fermions. We use the notion “bosonic” because the oscillator operators have a<br />

commutator [a k ,a † k ] = 1. Here, a† k <strong>and</strong> a k describe transitions between transverse<br />

subb<strong>and</strong>s – not particle creation <strong>and</strong> annihilation. In this form, the Hamiltonian<br />

resembles models of matter-light interaction of quantum optics like the Rabi<br />

Hamiltonian [82], where, in the simplest case, two atomic levels – representing a<br />

pseudo-spin – are coupled to a monochromatic radiation mode, see Fig. 2.5. In<br />

quantum optics such pseudo-spin boson models consist of distinct physical subsystems<br />

(atom <strong>and</strong> light) whereas in the case of QWR two degrees of freedom of<br />

the same particle are coupled.<br />

Due to the complexity of the <strong>coupling</strong> between spin <strong>and</strong> <strong>orbit</strong>als in Eq. (2.5),<br />

in general, no analytical solution of the Hamiltonian is feasible. We apply an exact<br />

numerical diagonalisation to find the spectral properties of the wire. Figure 2.6<br />

shows the low-energy spectra of the QWR for various strengths of confinement,<br />

SO <strong>coupling</strong> <strong>and</strong> perpendicular magnetic field. For a better physical underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

we summarise analytical limits <strong>and</strong> approximations in the following.<br />

2.2.1 Zero magnetic field<br />

For B = 0 the Hamiltonian (2.5) reduces to<br />

H(k)<br />

= a †<br />

ω<br />

k a k + 1<br />

0 2 + 1 2 (kl 0) 2 + 1 (<br />

l 0<br />

kl 0 σ x +<br />

i<br />

)<br />

√<br />

(a k − a †<br />

2 l SO 2<br />

k<br />

)σ y , (2.17)<br />

=: H 0 + H mix , (2.18)<br />

with H mix = 2 −3/2 i(l 0 /l SO )(a k − a † k )σ y. This limit was studied in detail by<br />

Moroz & Barnes [67], <strong>and</strong> Governale & Zülicke [69,70]. H 0 represents the maxi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!