24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 Rashba spin-<strong>orbit</strong> <strong>coupling</strong> in quantum dots<br />

PSfrag replacements<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

×100<br />

Γep in 10 −5 ω0<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1 2<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

B/B 0<br />

2<br />

Figure 3.7: Phonon-induced relaxation rate for InAs quantum dot. Close to B = B 0<br />

the rate is strongly suppressed to Γ ep < 10 −7 ω 0 ≈ 10 4 s −1 .<br />

to a strongly detuned system) the exponential decay of I(ξ) also suppresses the<br />

rate (see appendix C).<br />

The suppression of the relaxation rate close to the resonance can be traced back<br />

to the factor ξ 5 in Eq. (3.61) which in turn originates from the q-dependence of<br />

the matrix element (3.56). In a physical sense, this matrix element is a measure<br />

for how the <strong>coupling</strong> to <strong>phonon</strong>s modifies the overlap of previously orthogonal<br />

states. Equations (B.4) <strong>and</strong> (B.5) in App. B show that the interaction with <strong>phonon</strong>s<br />

leads to a displacement of the Fock–Darwin states in the QD. The effectiveness<br />

of this displacement on the <strong>orbit</strong>al overlap manifests itself in the aforementioned<br />

q-dependence of Eq. (3.56), showing the overlap to be maximal at ˜lq ‖ ≈ 1. Thus,<br />

<strong>phonon</strong>s couple most strongly to <strong>electron</strong>s if their wavelength is comparable to the<br />

size of the QD, or in terms of energy, if the typical <strong>phonon</strong> energy is of order ω s .<br />

Close to resonance, however, the splitting of eigenstates ∆ is given by the weak<br />

SO <strong>coupling</strong>, leading to ∆ ≪ ω s . In this regime <strong>phonon</strong>s couple very inefficiently<br />

to the <strong>electron</strong>s of the QD – thus causing the relaxation rate to be suppressed.<br />

The factor sinθ + sinθ − in Eq. (3.56) corresponds to the misalignment of spin.<br />

Since the <strong>electron</strong>-<strong>phonon</strong> interaction (3.51) does not lead to direct spin flips,<br />

transitions between ψ ± are only possible due to the spin admixture of the JCM<br />

eigenstates. This admixture is maximal at resonance with sin 2 θ ± = 1/2. Far from<br />

resonance ψ +(−) are approximately spin-up(down) like, suppressing the transition<br />

rate by the factor sin 2 θ + sin 2 θ − .<br />

For a quantitative analysis we introduce acousto-mechanical parameters of<br />

bulk InAs [142], ρ M = 5.7 · 10 3 Kg/m 3 , c long = 3.8 · 10 3 m/s, c trans = 2.6 · 10 3 m/s,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!