Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.4 Summary 45<br />
For weak SO <strong>coupling</strong> the dominating Fourier component of the transmission<br />
coefficients can be approximated in lowest order by<br />
T ++ ≈ T −− ≈ 1 − ¯κ 2 [1 − cosa(k − − k + )], (2.68)<br />
T +− ≈ T −+ ≈ ¯κ 2 [1 − cosa(k − − k + )], (2.69)<br />
where ¯κ := κ/k F . The oscillations in the reflection probabilities R σσ ′ (not shown<br />
here) are orders of magnitude smaller <strong>and</strong> carry also higher Fourier components<br />
(e.g. periods π/k σ ) as a signal of st<strong>and</strong>ard Fabry–Perot like interference of the<br />
<strong>orbit</strong>al wavefunction. In the chosen regime with weak SO <strong>coupling</strong> <strong>and</strong> magnetic<br />
field, apart from the small deviations due to reflection, the barrier is almost perfectly<br />
conducting since T ++ +T +− =T −− +T −+ ≈1 by Eq. (2.68) <strong>and</strong> (2.69). The<br />
oscillating features in the spin-resolved transmission in Fig. 2.12a+b clearly originate<br />
from the interference of the spinors which is driven by the spin precession.<br />
We remark that in order to actually resolve the commensurability effect in the<br />
transmission a spin-dependent measurement is needed. Without being sensitive to<br />
the spin, the total transmission T := ∑ σσ ′ T σσ ′ shows only st<strong>and</strong>ard Fabry–Perot<br />
like interference on the scale of the Fermi wavelength, 1/k F ≪a 0 .<br />
We point out that due symmetry properties of the <strong>scattering</strong> matrix of the system<br />
no polarisation effect in the transmitted <strong>electron</strong> flux can be expected. For a<br />
detailed symmetry analysis see Ref. [58].<br />
In the context of magnetic superlattices, a sinusoidal modulation matches<br />
more realistically the experimental situation. Figure 2.13a+b shows the spindependent<br />
transmission coefficients for a cosine-shaped magnetic barrier (see<br />
Fig. 2.11b) of width a where the magnetic field is<br />
⎧<br />
⎨ +B 0 ê z for |x| > a/2,<br />
B =<br />
⎩−B 0 ê z cos2π x for |x| < a/2.<br />
a<br />
(2.70)<br />
In contrast to the result for a rectangular barrier, the reduction of the spin-conserving<br />
transmission is not a periodic feature with increasing barrier width due to the<br />
non-constant modulation. In panel c+d the results for transmission through 10<br />
sinusoidal periods are shown. Again, the reduction of T σσ is strongly enhanced by<br />
cumulating a small effect when successively passing consecutive barriers.<br />
2.4 Summary<br />
In this chapter, the interplay of spin-<strong>orbit</strong> (SO) <strong>coupling</strong> <strong>and</strong> geometrical confinement<br />
in quasi-one-dimensional quantum wires (QWRs) in perpendicular magnetic