24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4 Summary 45<br />

For weak SO <strong>coupling</strong> the dominating Fourier component of the transmission<br />

coefficients can be approximated in lowest order by<br />

T ++ ≈ T −− ≈ 1 − ¯κ 2 [1 − cosa(k − − k + )], (2.68)<br />

T +− ≈ T −+ ≈ ¯κ 2 [1 − cosa(k − − k + )], (2.69)<br />

where ¯κ := κ/k F . The oscillations in the reflection probabilities R σσ ′ (not shown<br />

here) are orders of magnitude smaller <strong>and</strong> carry also higher Fourier components<br />

(e.g. periods π/k σ ) as a signal of st<strong>and</strong>ard Fabry–Perot like interference of the<br />

<strong>orbit</strong>al wavefunction. In the chosen regime with weak SO <strong>coupling</strong> <strong>and</strong> magnetic<br />

field, apart from the small deviations due to reflection, the barrier is almost perfectly<br />

conducting since T ++ +T +− =T −− +T −+ ≈1 by Eq. (2.68) <strong>and</strong> (2.69). The<br />

oscillating features in the spin-resolved transmission in Fig. 2.12a+b clearly originate<br />

from the interference of the spinors which is driven by the spin precession.<br />

We remark that in order to actually resolve the commensurability effect in the<br />

transmission a spin-dependent measurement is needed. Without being sensitive to<br />

the spin, the total transmission T := ∑ σσ ′ T σσ ′ shows only st<strong>and</strong>ard Fabry–Perot<br />

like interference on the scale of the Fermi wavelength, 1/k F ≪a 0 .<br />

We point out that due symmetry properties of the <strong>scattering</strong> matrix of the system<br />

no polarisation effect in the transmitted <strong>electron</strong> flux can be expected. For a<br />

detailed symmetry analysis see Ref. [58].<br />

In the context of magnetic superlattices, a sinusoidal modulation matches<br />

more realistically the experimental situation. Figure 2.13a+b shows the spindependent<br />

transmission coefficients for a cosine-shaped magnetic barrier (see<br />

Fig. 2.11b) of width a where the magnetic field is<br />

⎧<br />

⎨ +B 0 ê z for |x| > a/2,<br />

B =<br />

⎩−B 0 ê z cos2π x for |x| < a/2.<br />

a<br />

(2.70)<br />

In contrast to the result for a rectangular barrier, the reduction of the spin-conserving<br />

transmission is not a periodic feature with increasing barrier width due to the<br />

non-constant modulation. In panel c+d the results for transmission through 10<br />

sinusoidal periods are shown. Again, the reduction of T σσ is strongly enhanced by<br />

cumulating a small effect when successively passing consecutive barriers.<br />

2.4 Summary<br />

In this chapter, the interplay of spin-<strong>orbit</strong> (SO) <strong>coupling</strong> <strong>and</strong> geometrical confinement<br />

in quasi-one-dimensional quantum wires (QWRs) in perpendicular magnetic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!