24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 Rashba spin-<strong>orbit</strong> <strong>coupling</strong> in quantum dots<br />

finement. This decouples the ω + modes from the rest of the system, giving<br />

H = ω + n + + H JC , (3.26)<br />

with energies rescaled by ω 0 <strong>and</strong> the Jaynes–Cummings model (JCM) H JC given<br />

by Eq. (3.6),<br />

H JC = ω − a † −a − + 1 )<br />

2 E zσ z + λ<br />

(a − σ + + a † −σ − , (3.27)<br />

with λ = l0 2γ −/2˜l l SO . This model is completely integrable (see appendix. A) has<br />

ground state |0,↓〉 with energy E G = −E z /2 <strong>and</strong> excited energies<br />

(<br />

E α (n,±) = n + 1 )<br />

ω − ± ∆ n<br />

2 2 , (3.28)<br />

with detuning δ ≡ ω − − E z <strong>and</strong> ∆ n ≡ √ δ 2 + 4λ 2 (n + 1), corresponding to the<br />

eigenstates<br />

|ψ (n,±)<br />

α<br />

〉 = cosθ (n,±)<br />

α<br />

|n,↑〉 + sinθ (n,±)<br />

α |n + 1,↓〉, (3.29)<br />

with tanθ α<br />

(n,±) = (δ±∆ n )/2λ √ n + 1. For our parameters, this model describes the<br />

energy levels of the SO-interacting QD to within 10% of the typical anticrossing<br />

width (given by ∆ n in the JCM) <strong>and</strong> 1% of ω 0 . This small discrepancy is shown<br />

in Fig. 3.1b. As a characteristic measure of the quality of the RWA we can use<br />

the prediction of the JCM that the anticrossing width increases with α √ n + 1.<br />

In Fig. 3.1c this width ∆ is plotted against its central energy. The JCM (solid<br />

line) is compared with the exact numerical result (circles). For a QD of size<br />

l 0 = 150nm, almost perfect coincidence is found for α between (0.3...1.5) ×<br />

10 −12 eVm, corresponding to experimentally found values in InGaAs [25]. For<br />

larger values the anticrossing width is underestimated in the JCM, as indicated<br />

in uppermost curve in Fig. 3.1c for the value α = 2.0 × 10 −12 eVm. Therefore,<br />

we can conclude that the JCM is a reasonable approximation for SO-interacting<br />

QDs where the confinement is stronger than the SO <strong>coupling</strong>. In this regime the<br />

integrability of the JCM provides us with the analytical eigenstates <strong>and</strong> energies<br />

which we use in the following to discuss coherent oscillations in a QD.<br />

3.2.4 Coherent oscillations<br />

In this section we investigate coherent oscillations (CO) in a SO-coupled QD system.<br />

This illustrates the fruitfulness of the analogy with quantum optics. Although<br />

the origin of coherent oscillations is simply the fact that the time evolution of a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!