Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
66 Rashba spin-<strong>orbit</strong> <strong>coupling</strong> in quantum dots<br />
finement. This decouples the ω + modes from the rest of the system, giving<br />
H = ω + n + + H JC , (3.26)<br />
with energies rescaled by ω 0 <strong>and</strong> the Jaynes–Cummings model (JCM) H JC given<br />
by Eq. (3.6),<br />
H JC = ω − a † −a − + 1 )<br />
2 E zσ z + λ<br />
(a − σ + + a † −σ − , (3.27)<br />
with λ = l0 2γ −/2˜l l SO . This model is completely integrable (see appendix. A) has<br />
ground state |0,↓〉 with energy E G = −E z /2 <strong>and</strong> excited energies<br />
(<br />
E α (n,±) = n + 1 )<br />
ω − ± ∆ n<br />
2 2 , (3.28)<br />
with detuning δ ≡ ω − − E z <strong>and</strong> ∆ n ≡ √ δ 2 + 4λ 2 (n + 1), corresponding to the<br />
eigenstates<br />
|ψ (n,±)<br />
α<br />
〉 = cosθ (n,±)<br />
α<br />
|n,↑〉 + sinθ (n,±)<br />
α |n + 1,↓〉, (3.29)<br />
with tanθ α<br />
(n,±) = (δ±∆ n )/2λ √ n + 1. For our parameters, this model describes the<br />
energy levels of the SO-interacting QD to within 10% of the typical anticrossing<br />
width (given by ∆ n in the JCM) <strong>and</strong> 1% of ω 0 . This small discrepancy is shown<br />
in Fig. 3.1b. As a characteristic measure of the quality of the RWA we can use<br />
the prediction of the JCM that the anticrossing width increases with α √ n + 1.<br />
In Fig. 3.1c this width ∆ is plotted against its central energy. The JCM (solid<br />
line) is compared with the exact numerical result (circles). For a QD of size<br />
l 0 = 150nm, almost perfect coincidence is found for α between (0.3...1.5) ×<br />
10 −12 eVm, corresponding to experimentally found values in InGaAs [25]. For<br />
larger values the anticrossing width is underestimated in the JCM, as indicated<br />
in uppermost curve in Fig. 3.1c for the value α = 2.0 × 10 −12 eVm. Therefore,<br />
we can conclude that the JCM is a reasonable approximation for SO-interacting<br />
QDs where the confinement is stronger than the SO <strong>coupling</strong>. In this regime the<br />
integrability of the JCM provides us with the analytical eigenstates <strong>and</strong> energies<br />
which we use in the following to discuss coherent oscillations in a QD.<br />
3.2.4 Coherent oscillations<br />
In this section we investigate coherent oscillations (CO) in a SO-coupled QD system.<br />
This illustrates the fruitfulness of the analogy with quantum optics. Although<br />
the origin of coherent oscillations is simply the fact that the time evolution of a