24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PSfrag replacements<br />

2.1 Rashba effect <strong>and</strong> magnetic field in semiconductor quantum wires 25<br />

(a)<br />

1<br />

l B = 4.0 l 0<br />

(b)<br />

1<br />

l B = 1.0 l 0<br />

〈σ x,z 〉<br />

0<br />

0<br />

−1<br />

〈σ x 〉 0<br />

〈σ x 〉 0<br />

〈σ z 〉 0 〈σ z 〉 0<br />

〈σ x 〉 1 〈σ x 〉 1<br />

〈σ z 〉 1<br />

〈σ z 〉 1<br />

−2 0 2<br />

−1<br />

−4 0 4<br />

l 0 k<br />

l 0 k<br />

Figure 2.4: Expectation values of spin for the two lowest eigenstates for l SO = l 0 .<br />

Solid: 〈σ x 〉 n , dashed: 〈σ z 〉 n . (a) weak magnetic field, l B = 4.0l 0 . Hybridisation of<br />

wavefunction at k ≈ 0 leads to finite 〈σ z 〉 n component. (b) Strong magnetic field,<br />

l B = 1.0l 0 .<br />

wavefunction,<br />

ψ ↑ n,k,s (x) = sψ↓ n,k,s<br />

(−x), s = ±1, (2.16)<br />

where s denotes the quantum number of the spin parity. This symmetry requires<br />

the spin density components perpendicular to the confinement to be antisymmetric,<br />

S y,z<br />

n,k,s<br />

(x) = −Sy,z<br />

n,k,s<br />

(−x), leading to vanishing spin expectation values,<br />

〈σ y,z 〉 n,k,s = R dxS y,z<br />

n,k,s (x) = 0. We note that using the σ z-representation for spinors<br />

even leads to zero longitudinal spin density S y n,k,s<br />

(x) ≡ 0 because the real <strong>and</strong><br />

symmetric Hamiltonian H(k) implies real transverse wavefunctions independent<br />

of the spin parity. Therefore, it is sufficient to consider the x- <strong>and</strong> z-components<br />

of the spin, only.<br />

For zero magnetic field, it has been pointed out that for large k the spin is<br />

approximately quantised in the confinement direction [69, 70]. This is due to<br />

the so-called longitudinal-SOI approximation [68] which becomes valid when the<br />

term linear in k in the SOI [Eq. (2.5)] exceeds the <strong>coupling</strong> to the neighbouring<br />

subb<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

The perpendicular magnetic field breaks spin parity <strong>and</strong> thereby leads to a<br />

hybridisation of formerly degenerate states for small k. In addition, the breaking<br />

of the symmetry of the wavefunction Eq. (2.16) leads to modifications of the spin<br />

density.<br />

In Fig. 2.4 the expectation value of spin is shown as a function of the longitudinal<br />

momentum for the two lowest subb<strong>and</strong>s. For weak magnetic field (Fig. 2.4a)<br />

results similar to the zero magnetic field case [69, 70] are found. For large k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!