24.05.2014 Views

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

Spin-orbit coupling and electron-phonon scattering - Fachbereich ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 Electron transport in one-dimensional systems with Rashba effect 43<br />

(a)<br />

PSfrag replacements<br />

(b)<br />

(b)<br />

PSfrag replacements<br />

+B 0<br />

x<br />

(a)<br />

+B 0<br />

x<br />

− a 2<br />

+ a 2<br />

− a 2<br />

+ a 2<br />

Figure 2.11: Models of magnetic barriers: rectangular (a) <strong>and</strong> sinusoidal (b).<br />

In the following, we show results for the transport through magnetic barriers<br />

with rectangular <strong>and</strong> sinusoidal modulation. Both cases show a commensurability<br />

effect when the modulation period becomes comparable to the SO-induced spin<br />

precession length. Here, we restrict ourselves to Fermi energies much higher than<br />

the gap in the dispersion in Fig. 2.8. Following the experimental motivation of<br />

magnetic superlattices, we assume weak magnetic modulation (∼25mT).<br />

First, we consider a simple rectangular barrier (Fig. 2.11a) of width a where<br />

{ +B0 ê z for |x| > a/2,<br />

B =<br />

−B 0 ê z<br />

for |x| < a/2.<br />

(2.67)<br />

(The SO <strong>coupling</strong> strength <strong>and</strong> electrostatic potential is assumed to be constant.)<br />

Although the flip of the magnetic field direction in the barrier does not change<br />

eigenenergies <strong>and</strong> wave vectors, it does change the eigenstates, see Eq. (2.44).<br />

Therefore, when injecting right-moving <strong>electron</strong>s with spin σ, in perfect analogy<br />

to the st<strong>and</strong>ard spinFET [42], the probability to find the same spin directly behind<br />

the barrier is a periodic function of the barrier width, corresponding to spin precession<br />

with period a 0 = 2π/|k + −k − |, by Eq. (2.47) <strong>and</strong> (2.48). If the parameters<br />

κ <strong>and</strong> k SO are small at the scale of Fermi energy this period becomes a 0 ≈ π/2k SO .<br />

In Fig. 2.12 the numerically calculated coefficients for spin-dependent transmission<br />

are shown for a single barrier <strong>and</strong> a modulation with 10 rectangular periods<br />

in series. For the used parameters with weak SO <strong>coupling</strong> the spin precession<br />

period corresponds to a 0 ≈ 0.33µm, being within range of state-of-the-art experimental<br />

technique. For the case a of single barrier (panel a+b) the effect of spin<br />

precession is seen as a reduction of the spin conserving transmission T σσ when<br />

the barrier width becomes commensurate with half of the spin precession length.<br />

This commensurability effect is most clearly seen in the narrow dip in the<br />

spin-conserving transmission. At a barrier width such that ak SO /π = 1/4 injected<br />

<strong>electron</strong>s with polarisation “±” are rotated to “∓” while propagating through the<br />

barrier <strong>and</strong> thus not matching the wavefunction of the region behind the barrier.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!