13.06.2014 Views

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.0 PROJECTIONS<br />

6.4.1 Future Coal-fired and Natural Gas-fired Electric Power Production<br />

Several companies have announced plans to build additional<br />

generating capacity in the Northeast <strong>Wyoming</strong> River Basin, and those<br />

plans are in various stages of implementation. The plans for plants involve<br />

dry cooling towers and limited usage of groundwater for process purposes.<br />

<strong>Water</strong> requirements for dry-cooled plants are less than for plants with wet<br />

cooling towers which are in use at other locations, including the Dave<br />

Johnston Power <strong>Plan</strong>t in Converse County, Laramie River Station in Platte<br />

County, Naughton Power <strong>Plan</strong>t in Lincoln County, and Jim Bridger Power<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>t in Sweetwater County. While wet-cooled plants are more efficient and less costly to run than drycooled<br />

plants, their water requirements are much larger. Given the fact that there is relatively little<br />

surface water available in proximity to the coal resources of Northeast <strong>Wyoming</strong>, it appears likely that<br />

dry cooling will remain the technology of choice in Northeast <strong>Wyoming</strong> for power production for the<br />

foreseeable future.<br />

In the Green River Basin, the expansion would be wet-cooled plants supplied by surface water<br />

from the Green River.<br />

The most agressive development in the Platte River Basin would include the addition of natural<br />

gas-fired generation capacity and coal conversion. This additional capacity would be two wet-cooled<br />

plants.<br />

In the Powder/Tongue River Basin, additional generating capacity would be wet-cooled and<br />

likely associated with Lake DeSmet Reservoir where substantial volumes of water are available.<br />

The Wind/Bighorn River Basin is the remaining basin where coal or natural gas-fired generation<br />

capacity might be built. The development of two coal-fired power plants and two natural gas-fired power<br />

plants would be wet-cooled.<br />

The Bear River Basin and the Snake/Salt River Basin will not likely see any development of coalfired<br />

or natural gas-fired electrical power generation during the planning period.<br />

Projections of future water needs for electric power generation are described below for high,<br />

moderate, and low growth scenarios. The Northeast <strong>Wyoming</strong> projections are based upon the assumption<br />

that dry cooling and limited groundwater pumping for process water will continue to be the predominant<br />

technology employed. An added assumption for the High and Mid Scenarios is that the transmission<br />

bottleneck out of <strong>Wyoming</strong> will be eliminated and thus encourage the construction of additional electrical<br />

generating capacity.<br />

High Scenario<br />

In the Green River Basin, the High Scenario assumes that in addition to a 1,000 MW expansion<br />

of the Jim Bridger Power <strong>Plan</strong>t, a new 3,000 MW coal-fired generating facility will be built in the vicinity<br />

of coal deposits near Creston Junction, using water piped from the Green River. This will require an<br />

additional 68,700 acre-feet of cooling water.<br />

The High Scenario for electric power production in Northeast <strong>Wyoming</strong> assumes that 2,390 MW<br />

of planned capacity addition will take place, and that an additional 1,200 MW of capacity not yet<br />

announced will be added to help meet the nation’s growing energy needs. This additional capacity may<br />

require the adoption of new emissions control technology to meet air quality standards or the relaxation of<br />

those standards to allow increased production, neither of which is assured. Nevertheless, the addition of<br />

3,590 MW of generating capacity constitutes a reasonable High Scenario forecast for Northeast<br />

6-126.1gfhgf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!