13.06.2014 Views

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.0 OPPORTUNITIES<br />

Northeast, Wind/Bighorn) and to evaluate opportunities in the Bear River that had not been previously<br />

ranked. This scoring matrix includes both monetary and non-monetary factors.<br />

Monetary Factors<br />

! Size – reservoir size in acre-feet.<br />

! Irrigated Acreage – presently irrigated acreage.<br />

! 2007 Total Project Costs – project costs updated to 2007.<br />

! Unit Cost – project costs divided by project size.<br />

! Sponsor’s Cost – cost per irrigated acre per year assuming WWDC financing (two-thirds<br />

grant, one-third loan at 4 percent for 20 years).<br />

! Comments<br />

Non-monetary Factors<br />

! Need – project need based on shortages.<br />

! <strong>Water</strong> Availability – availability of water.<br />

! Project Ability to Meet Need – project location and size relative to needs.<br />

! Multiple Use Potential – potential for recreation, flood control, water quality improvement,<br />

etc.<br />

! Geotechnical Feasibility – preliminary geotechnical evaluation.<br />

! Land Ownership – preliminary evaluation of landownership issues.<br />

! Cultural Resources – preliminary evaluation of impacts.<br />

! Environmental Impacts –preliminary evaluation of impacts on wetlands, riparian habitat,<br />

wildlife, etc.<br />

! Ability to Permit – comparative evaluation of potential for successful project permitting.<br />

! Cost – relative evaluation of project costs versus project benefits.<br />

! Total – total of non-monetary factor scores.<br />

Each of the non-monetary factors was assigned a weighted value that reflects the importance of<br />

that factor to project feasibility, and each potential project was assigned a score from 0 to 10 for each<br />

factor.<br />

8.2.4 Agricultural Needs<br />

Chapter 6 outlines the projected future water needs for the seven river basin planning areas in the<br />

state. Agriculture is the major water user in the state and exhibits the bulk of the seasonal shortage needs<br />

across the state.<br />

The estimates of existing agricultural need used in the <strong>Framework</strong> Scoring Matrix were based<br />

upon full supply requirements. Full supply requirements were determined by applying the irrigation<br />

water requirement to the actual irrigated acreage. The water requirement derived from this calculation<br />

was compared to the historical diversions during dry years. The difference between the full supply<br />

requirement minus the historical diversion is the estimated shortage.<br />

The results of the agricultural water use estimates were used as inputs to the water availability<br />

models prepared for the planning effort as discussed in Chapter 7. The modeling was used to determine<br />

the availability of excess flows for future development and also as a means of determining where there<br />

8-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!