13.06.2014 Views

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.0 AVAILABILITY<br />

the substantial benefits of more stable chemistry, much reduced treatment requirements, higher winter<br />

temperatures, etc. Similarly, a decision on development of additional water supplies as groundwater or<br />

surface water may depend on the availability of project funding, which may vary by water source. Where<br />

surface flows are adequate to meet demands on average, but may be seasonally inadequate or may be<br />

compromised by short-term drought cycles, use of the alluvial groundwater reservoir may be useful to<br />

modulate variations in the availability of surface water resources over time.<br />

The most abundant supply of undeveloped alluvial groundwater appears to be in the Snake/Salt<br />

Basin, particularly in the Snake River Aquifer in Teton County. Given the abundance of available surface<br />

water in that basin, conflicts with surface water are not expected to be a major constraint on groundwater<br />

development. In the Platte Basin, in contrast, surface water connection is addressed by the Modified<br />

North Platte Decree and the recently finalized Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP),<br />

and presents a major limitation on future development. Maps have been developed of those portions of<br />

the Platte River Basin that, upon initial investigation, appear to produce depletions less than the<br />

“hydrologically connected’ criteria. In areas more closely associated with stream depletions, major<br />

additional development of groundwater in the Platte Basin is likely to come primarily through trade or<br />

replacement arrangements with respect to surface water.<br />

In summary, the above approaches to estimate the amount of groundwater in storage and the total<br />

recharge to groundwater provide upper bounds on the possible supplies of mineable groundwater and<br />

sustainable groundwater production, respectively. As a practical matter, however, the available<br />

groundwater supply is substantially less.<br />

7.2.5 Groundwater Quality<br />

Most water uses have some sensitivity to water quality. Thus,<br />

groundwater availability also will be a function of how the quality from a<br />

particular aquifer and location aligns with the needs of a particular use.<br />

As explained in Chapter 4, natural groundwater quality is generally best<br />

closest to outcrop and deteriorates the longer groundwater has been in<br />

contact with aquifer minerals. This effect is weakest in the “major<br />

aquifers” of Figure 4-9 and strongest in the “minor” and “marginal”<br />

aquifers.<br />

For the most part, <strong>Wyoming</strong> has been relatively free of<br />

widespread human impacts to groundwater quality. Beyond conflicts<br />

associated with relatively high concentrations of nitrates in water supply<br />

wells around Torrington, generally understood to result from application<br />

of crop fertilizer, groundwater contamination issues in <strong>Wyoming</strong> have<br />

largely been confined to local incidents of spills and leaks. These<br />

incidents have compromised the availability of groundwater in local areas<br />

but rarely have had widespread effects.<br />

As discussed in Chapter 4, certain <strong>Wyoming</strong> aquifers are more susceptible to contamination than<br />

others. The alluvial aquifers are generally the most productive, but due to their relatively high<br />

permeabilities, exposure at the surface, and location along developed stream corridors, they are more<br />

subject to water quality impacts from surface uses.<br />

7-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!