13.06.2014 Views

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

Wyoming Framework Water Plan - Living Rivers Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<br />

in most areas, to the depth at which there is no significant porosity to contain ground water, e.g.<br />

the crystalline basement rocks underlying the entire Snake/Salt River basin and forming the visible<br />

core of the highest mountains. The volume of pore space in this material represents the volume<br />

of ground water and is likely on the order of 100's of millions of acre-ft. Much of this water<br />

is of unusable quality (e.g. due to great depth) or is contained in formations from which ground<br />

water cannot be extracted at useful rates (e.g. thick shale units), so the useable ground water<br />

resource is vastly smaller than the total ground water in storage.<br />

Considering only the alluvial aquifer (covering approximately 400 mi 2 ) in the Snake/Salt River<br />

basin, and assuming an average saturated thickness of 200 feet and an effective porosity of 20%,<br />

a volume of 10 million acre-ft of useful ground water in storage is calculated. Were ground water<br />

a static, nonrenewable resource, like coal, this volume might approximate the developable<br />

resource.<br />

Ground water is a very dynamic resource, particularly ground water of high quality occurring at<br />

depths feasible for development. Data suggest an average annual recharge rate of approximately<br />

4 inches = 1 million ac-ft/yr spread across the 4700 mi 2 of the Snake/Salt River basin. The base<br />

flows of the Salt and Greys <strong>Rivers</strong> (i.e. the streamflow that is sustained by ground water input<br />

through the period of the year without significant precipitation input) suggest average ground<br />

water output of 250 and 350 ac-ft/mi 2 /yr, respectively. (The Snake River basin below Jackson<br />

Lake is not considered due to the impact of reservoir modulation on base flows.) Applying a value<br />

of 300 ac-ft/mi 2 /yr to the entire basin suggests a total ground water output of 1.5 million ac-ft/yr,<br />

roughly comparable to the recharge-based estimate. Of course, development and consumption of<br />

this "available" ground water would leave the streams of the Snake/Salt River basin dry through<br />

much of the year.<br />

A more detailed, ground water-model based mass balance for the alluvial aquifer between Jackson<br />

Lake and Hoback Junction was developed by San Juan and Kolm (1996). They estimated total<br />

recharge of approximately 50,000 acre-ft per year, with 25,000 acre-ft per year of ground water<br />

discharge through evapotranspiration and 25,000 acre-ft per year of discharge to streams.<br />

In any case, the inescapable requirements of mass balance mean that additional ground water consumption<br />

causes either a decrease in ground water storage (declining ground water level/pressure),<br />

a decrease in consumption elsewhere in the hydrologic system, or depletion of surface<br />

water. There is little indication of widespread reductions in ground water levels in the study area<br />

(although long-term data are sparse).<br />

WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS<br />

<strong>Water</strong> demand projections were developed utilizing an economics based approach. Using a planning<br />

period of 30 years, the various aspects of water use were projected for high, mid, and low<br />

Snake/ Salt River Basin <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>Page</strong> 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!