Ecological Transport Information Tool for Worldwide ... - Schenker

Page 66
IFEU Heidelberg, Öko-Institut, IVE, RMCON
nels /general reference on the effect see Planco 2007/. All emissions from full and empty voyages
as well as during time in port are normalized to the transport of one tkm.
Table 39: Assumption of vessel number, vessel utilization and overall transport work
per year for inland vessels
Ship Type Subtype Cargo utilization Number per class
Transport work
per year [tkm]
Class IV Neo K 0.45 230 2 080 000 000
Class IV Europaschiff 0.45 670 12 699 000 000
Class Va RoRo 0.60 186 9 430 000 000
Class Va Tankship 0.45 128 5 841 000 000
Class Via JOWI Schiff 0.45 12 1 545 000 000
Class Vib Push Convoy 0.60 111 29 675 000 000
For number and transport work: Planco 2007
The resulting emission factors with average weight cargo for container transport are presented
in Table 40. The lower emission factors for container carrying inland vessels compared to the
bulk carrying inland vessels are a result of the better vessel utilization rates.
Table 40: Emission factors for inland vessels. Container transport figures represent the
average container load of 10.5 t/TEU.
Ship Type Standard type
Dead weight
tons
CO2 SUM
[g/t-km]
CO2 eq SUM
[g/t-km]
Nox SUM
[g/t-km]
SOx SUM
[g/t-km]
HC SUM
[g/t-km]
PM10 SUM
[g/t-km]
Inland Barge all others EURO ship like Klasse V) > class Va >2000 t 37.74 38.11 0.65 0.24 0.0152 0.0167
Inland Barge Container all others EURO ship like Klasse V) > class Va >2000 t 31.50 31.80 0.54 0.20 0.0127 0.0139
5.4.3 Allocatin rules for inland vessels
For inland vessels the same allocation rules than for ocean going vessels apply (see chapter
5.3.4).
EcoTransIT World: Methodology and Data – July 15 th , 2010