11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 2005<br />

dissimilar from the local emissions because of spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of<br />

emissions sources. Comparisons of the known source contributions in air samples to local<br />

emissions showed that the impacts of spatial heterogeneity were most pronounced for downwind<br />

receptors and receptors located near major point sources. The impacts of spatial heterogeneity in<br />

emission inventories were least, but not absent, for urban/suburban receptors with a mix of<br />

residential/commercial/industrial emissions.<br />

Effects of spatial heterogeneity in emissions are likely under represented in the grid model<br />

experiments of this study compared to the real-world because (1) the grid model cannot represent<br />

micro-scale (sub 5-km) variations in emissions, and (2) grid modelers have limited information<br />

to spatially allocate emissions and so use spatial surrogates to allocate emissions (e.g.,<br />

population) which simplify the texture in the emissions inventory. Micro-scale impacts present a<br />

challenge to selecting regionally representative monitoring locations in a real-world study where<br />

the goal is to characterize a regional emissions inventory.<br />

Measure of “Total” Organic Compounds<br />

There are several ways of defining the “total” of organic compounds for an emissions inventory<br />

or a receptor model analysis. Measures that are most appropriate for an emissions inventory (e.g.<br />

ROG, TOG) tend to be all inclusive, whereas a receptor model such as CMB is applied for a<br />

specific set of VOC species such as the PAMS list. Bridging the gap between emission<br />

inventories and receptor model results requires assumptions about relationships between<br />

different measures of total organic compounds, such as PAMS/ROG ratios. The emission<br />

inventory modeling for this revealed relationships between TOG, ROG and PAMS for 22 source<br />

category groupings. The ROG/TOG ratios ranged from 0.09 to 1.0. The PAMS/ROG ratios<br />

ranged from 0.23 to 2.4 (the sum of PAMS can be greater than ROG because ethane is included<br />

in PAMS but excluded from ROG).<br />

Relationships between different measures of total organic compounds are more difficult to<br />

characterize for some source categories than others. Difficulties for biogenic emissions are that<br />

the PAMS species list contains only a few biogenic compounds (e.g., isoprene, ethene) and that<br />

many non-PAMS biogenic compounds require specialized measurement methods because they<br />

are oxygenated and/or heavy (e.g., 15 carbon sesquiterpenes; Guenther et al., 1999). Solvents<br />

have similar difficulties to biogenics, especially for oxygenated organics used in water-based<br />

formulations. Diesel emissions include many heavier compounds (more than 12 carbons) that<br />

require specialized measurement methods and may be difficult to classify as included or<br />

excluded from measures of volatile organics (e.g., ROG, VOC). These considerations introduce<br />

uncertainties and may result in positive or negative biases in source category contributions.<br />

Source category contributions may vary significantly (by more than a factor of 2) depending<br />

upon how total organic compounds are measured. It follows that comparing different measures<br />

of total organic compounds between receptor modeling and emission inventories will introduce<br />

biases (either positive or negative) in comparisons of source category contributions. Corrections<br />

may be applied by assuming certain ratios (e.g., PAMS/ROG) for each category, but such<br />

assumptions are external to the receptor modeling process and must be accounted for separately.<br />

Recommendations for receptor modeling studies are: Clearly state the measure of organic<br />

compounds that is apportioned by the receptor model and define any conversion factors used to<br />

adjust this to a different basis. Conversion factors (e.g., PAMS/ROG ratios) must be consistent<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\ExecSum_r.doc<br />

ES-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!