CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
April 2005<br />
dissimilar from the local emissions because of spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of<br />
emissions sources. Comparisons of the known source contributions in air samples to local<br />
emissions showed that the impacts of spatial heterogeneity were most pronounced for downwind<br />
receptors and receptors located near major point sources. The impacts of spatial heterogeneity in<br />
emission inventories were least, but not absent, for urban/suburban receptors with a mix of<br />
residential/commercial/industrial emissions.<br />
Effects of spatial heterogeneity in emissions are likely under represented in the grid model<br />
experiments of this study compared to the real-world because (1) the grid model cannot represent<br />
micro-scale (sub 5-km) variations in emissions, and (2) grid modelers have limited information<br />
to spatially allocate emissions and so use spatial surrogates to allocate emissions (e.g.,<br />
population) which simplify the texture in the emissions inventory. Micro-scale impacts present a<br />
challenge to selecting regionally representative monitoring locations in a real-world study where<br />
the goal is to characterize a regional emissions inventory.<br />
Measure of “Total” Organic Compounds<br />
There are several ways of defining the “total” of organic compounds for an emissions inventory<br />
or a receptor model analysis. Measures that are most appropriate for an emissions inventory (e.g.<br />
ROG, TOG) tend to be all inclusive, whereas a receptor model such as CMB is applied for a<br />
specific set of VOC species such as the PAMS list. Bridging the gap between emission<br />
inventories and receptor model results requires assumptions about relationships between<br />
different measures of total organic compounds, such as PAMS/ROG ratios. The emission<br />
inventory modeling for this revealed relationships between TOG, ROG and PAMS for 22 source<br />
category groupings. The ROG/TOG ratios ranged from 0.09 to 1.0. The PAMS/ROG ratios<br />
ranged from 0.23 to 2.4 (the sum of PAMS can be greater than ROG because ethane is included<br />
in PAMS but excluded from ROG).<br />
Relationships between different measures of total organic compounds are more difficult to<br />
characterize for some source categories than others. Difficulties for biogenic emissions are that<br />
the PAMS species list contains only a few biogenic compounds (e.g., isoprene, ethene) and that<br />
many non-PAMS biogenic compounds require specialized measurement methods because they<br />
are oxygenated and/or heavy (e.g., 15 carbon sesquiterpenes; Guenther et al., 1999). Solvents<br />
have similar difficulties to biogenics, especially for oxygenated organics used in water-based<br />
formulations. Diesel emissions include many heavier compounds (more than 12 carbons) that<br />
require specialized measurement methods and may be difficult to classify as included or<br />
excluded from measures of volatile organics (e.g., ROG, VOC). These considerations introduce<br />
uncertainties and may result in positive or negative biases in source category contributions.<br />
Source category contributions may vary significantly (by more than a factor of 2) depending<br />
upon how total organic compounds are measured. It follows that comparing different measures<br />
of total organic compounds between receptor modeling and emission inventories will introduce<br />
biases (either positive or negative) in comparisons of source category contributions. Corrections<br />
may be applied by assuming certain ratios (e.g., PAMS/ROG) for each category, but such<br />
assumptions are external to the receptor modeling process and must be accounted for separately.<br />
Recommendations for receptor modeling studies are: Clearly state the measure of organic<br />
compounds that is apportioned by the receptor model and define any conversion factors used to<br />
adjust this to a different basis. Conversion factors (e.g., PAMS/ROG ratios) must be consistent<br />
H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\ExecSum_r.doc<br />
ES-9