CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

April 2005 Fujita, E.M. and D.E. Campbell. 2003. “Validation and Application Protocol for Source Apportionment of Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Ambient Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Data.” Executive Summary Report. EPA Grant #GR826237-01-0. August 31. Fujita, E.M., D.E. Campbell, B. Zielinska, J.C. Sagebiel, J.L. Bowen, W.S. Goliff, W.R. Stockwell, and D. R. Lawson. 2003a. Diurnal and Weekday Variations in the Source Contributions of Ozone Precursors in California's South Coast Air Basin. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 53, 844-863. Fujita, E.M., R.E. Keislar, J.L. Bowen, W. Goliff, F. Zhang, L.H. Sheetz, M.D. Keith, J.C. Sagebiel, and B. Zielinska. 1999a. 1998 Central Texas On-Road Hydrocarbon Study. Draft final report prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX under subcontract to PBS&J, Austin, TX, March, 1999 Fujita, E.M. 1999b. VOC Source Signatures in Houston, TX Phase 1: Sample Collection. Prepared for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (Contract No. 980069300) under subcontract to MCNC-North Carolina Supercomputing Center, Research Triangle Park, NC Fujita, E.M. 1998. Hydrocarbon Source Apportionment for the 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study. EPA Contract No. 68-D3-0030. Final report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, TX., March 1998. Fujita, E.M., Z. Lu, L. Sheetz, G. Harshfeld, and B. Zielinska. 1997. “Determination of Mobile Source Emission Fraction Using Ambient Field Measurements.” Report available from the Coordinating Research Council, 215 Perimeter Center Parkway, Atlanta, GA. . Fujita, E.M., Z. Lu, L. Sheetz, G. Harshfield, and B. Zielinska. 1997a. Determination of Mobile Source Emission Source Fraction Using Ambient Field Measurements. Final Report prepared for the Coordinating Research Council, Atlanta, GA, July 1997. Fujita, E.M., Z. Lu, L. Sheetz, G. Harshfield, T. Hayes, and B. Zielinska. 1997c. Hydrocarbon Source Apportionment in Western Washington. Report prepared for the State of Washington Department of Ecology, Lacy, WA, September, 1997. Fujita, E.M., Z. Lu, J. Sagebiel, N.F. Robinson, and J.G. Watson. 1995b. VOC Source Apportionment for the Coast Oxidant Assessment for Southeast Texas. Final report prepared for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, August 1995. Fujita, E.M., J.G. Watson, J.C. Chow and Z. Lu. 1994. "Validation of the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model Applied to Hydrocarbon Source Apportionment in the Southern California Air Quality Study." Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1633-1649. Gery, M.W., G.Z. Whitten, J.P. Killus, and M.C. Dodge. 1989. “A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling.” J. Geophysics Res. Vol.94, pp.12,925-12,956. Gordon, G.E. 1988. Receptor models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22, 1132-1142. H:\crca34-receptor\report\Final\refs.doc R-2
April 2005 Guenther, A., B. Baugh, G. Brasseur, J. Greenberg, P. Harley, L. Klinger, D. Serca, and L. Vierling. 1999. “Isoprene emission estimates and uncertainties for the Central African EXPRESSO study domain.” J. of Geophysical Research, 104, 30625-30639. Henry, R.C. 1997. "Receptor model applied to patterns in space (RMAPS) part I -model description." J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 47:216-225. Hidy, G.M. and C. Venkataraman. 1996. The chemical mass balance method for estimating atmospheric particle sources in Southern California. Chem. Eng. Comm. 151, 187-209. JPL. 1997. W.B. DeMore, S.P. Sander, D.M. Golden, R.F. Hampson, M.J. Kurylo, C.J. Howard, A.R. Ravishankara, C.E. Kolb, and M.J. Molina. “Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 13”, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, December. Available from http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/download.html. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL). 2002. “Gridded NCEP Meteorological Data Archives.” Silver Spring, MD. http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ss/transport/archives.html. Seila, R.L., H.H. Main, J.L. Arriaga, G. Martinez, and A.B. Ramadan. 2001. "Atmospheric volatile organic compound measurements during the 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study." The Science of the Total Environment, no. 276(1-3), Aug 10, 2001:pp. 153-69. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1999. “Final 1999 Amendment to the 1997 Ozone SIP Revision for the South Coast Air Basin.” SCAQMD, Diamond Bar, CA. December. Available from, http://www.aqmd.gov/aqmp/99amend2.html. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1997. “1997 Air Quality Management Plan, Appendix V, Modeling and Attainment Demonstrations.” SCAQMD, Diamond Bar, CA. November. Available from, http://www.aqmd.gov/aqmp/97aqmp/. Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow. 2004. "Receptor Models for Air Quality Management." Environmental Manager, pp.15-24, October. Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, and E.M. Fujita. 2001. "Review of Volatile Organic Compound Source Apportionment by Chemical Mass Balance." Atmos. Environ., 35(9), 1567-1584. Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, T.G. Pace. 1991. Chemical mass balance. In Receptor Modeling for Air Quality Management, Hopke, P.K., Ed. Elsevier Press, New York, NY, pp. 83-116. Watson, J.G., Robinson, N.F., Chow, J.C., Henry, R.C., Kim, B.M., Pace, T.G., Meyer, E.L., and Nguyen, Q. 1990. The USEPA/DRI chemical mass balance receptor model, CMB 7.0. ENVIRON. Software 5, 38-49. Watson, J.G. 1984. Overview of receptor model principles. JAPCA 34, 619-623. H:\crca34-receptor\report\Final\refs.doc R-3
Page 1 and 2:
International Corporation Air Scien
Page 3 and 4:
April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page E
Page 5 and 6:
April 2005 Table 4-1. Categories id
Page 7 and 8:
April 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recept
Page 9 and 10:
April 2005 Comparing the performanc
Page 11 and 12:
April 2005 90 12 Anaheim 80 10 Cr e
Page 13 and 14:
April 2005 This assumption is a mat
Page 15 and 16:
April 2005 dissimilar from the loca
Page 17 and 18:
April 2005 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STU
Page 19 and 20:
April 2005 1.4 OVERVIEW OF PROJECT
Page 21 and 22:
April 2005 Meteorological input dat
Page 23 and 24:
April 2005 A-34 Num Short Name Full
Page 25 and 26:
April 2005 Sunday 3-Aug-97 Monday 4
Page 27 and 28:
April 2005 ARB ROG TOG ARB Profile
Page 29 and 30:
April 2005 Industrial facilities fr
Page 31 and 32:
April 2005 Figure 2-2. Comparison o
Page 33 and 34:
April 2005 2.4 EXPERIMENTS FOR ROUN
Page 35 and 36:
April 2005 Table 2-9. Source catego
Page 37 and 38:
April 2005 Table 2-13. Replacement
Page 39 and 40:
April 2005 from front to back is th
Page 41 and 42:
April 2005 3. Set the average diese
Page 43 and 44:
April 2005 Table 2-15. Model year d
Page 45 and 46: April 2005 Table 2-17. Fuel composi
Page 47 and 48: April 2005 3.0 RECEPTOR MODELING ME
Page 49 and 50: April 2005 Selection of Fitting Spe
Page 51 and 52: April 2005 samples. Spatial variati
Page 53 and 54: April 2005 • Removed ethane from
Page 55 and 56: April 2005 Table 3-2. Criteria for
Page 57 and 58: April 2005 Table 3-4 (continued). N
Page 59 and 60: April 2005 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 no
Page 61 and 62: April 2005 4.0 RESULTS This section
Page 63 and 64: April 2005 (c) Round 4: Experiment
Page 65 and 66: April 2005 emissions contributions,
Page 67 and 68: April 2005 reactivity and found CMB
Page 69 and 70: April 2005 (c) Round 4: Experiments
Page 71 and 72: April 2005 (a) 6:00am to 9:00am 80
Page 73 and 74: April 2005 (a) siteid Anaheim exp 1
Page 75 and 76: April 2005 influence CMB performanc
Page 77 and 78: April 2005 Round 3: Experiments 9-1
Page 79 and 80: April 2005 Comparison of Source Con
Page 81 and 82: April 2005 Table 4-2. Source catego
Page 83 and 84: April 2005 contributions being diff
Page 85 and 86: April 2005 to 2.4 over the A-34 sou
Page 87 and 88: April 2005 Experiment 1: Base Case
Page 89 and 90: April 2005 28. Spatial heterogeneit
Page 91 and 92: April 2005 composition derived from
Page 93 and 94: April 2005 species (CNG and LPG for
Page 95: April 2005 REFERENCES Allen, P. 200
Page 99 and 100: APPENDIX A Supplemental Modeling Re
Page 101 and 102: SCC Description TOG %TOG Cumulative
Page 103 and 104: SCC Description TOG %TOG Cumulative
Page 105 and 106: ARB Profile Number TOG %Total % TOG
Page 107 and 108: A-34 Number SCC Code SCC Descriptio
Page 109 and 110: A-34 Number SCC Code SCC Descriptio
Page 111 and 112: Table A-4 (continued). A-34 Source
Page 113 and 114: Table A-5. Mean source profiles (PA
Page 115 and 116: Table A-5 (concluded). A-34 Source
Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX B CMB-Derived Source Contr
Page 119 and 120: SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) 18 16 14 12 1
Page 123 and 124: SCE (ppbC) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 6 5 C
Page 127 and 128: SCE (ppbC) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 6 5 Cons
Page 129 and 130: SCE (ppbC) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6
Page 131 and 132: SCE (ppbC) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Consumer P
Page 133 and 134: SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) 4
Page 137 and 138: SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) 12 10 8 6 4 2
Page 143 and 144: SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) 10
Page 145 and 146: SCE (ppbC) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 12 1
Page 147 and 148:
SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) SCE (ppbC) SC
Page 149 and 150:
SCE (ppbC) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Consumer P
Page 151 and 152:
SCE (ppbC) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40
Page 153:
Diamond Bar - Source Category 14 Di
show all

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?