CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
April 2005<br />
2.6 EXPERIMENTS FOR ROUND 3<br />
Four new experiments (9-12) were developed for Round 3 after Round 2 had been completed.<br />
ENVIRON and UC Davis decided to focus Round 3 on understanding how chemical decay and<br />
sampling noise influence CMB performance in situations where the receptor model should do<br />
well.<br />
• Conduct a factorial matrix of four experiments with chemistry and sampling noise turned<br />
on and off (Table 2-18).<br />
• Prepare the PAMS emission inventories using source profiles that DRI had used for CMB<br />
analysis in Rounds 1 and 2 (Table 2-19).<br />
• Instruct DRI to use the same profiles to analyze Round 3 as Rounds 1 and 2, without<br />
revealing that Round 3 was built upon these profiles.<br />
• Turning off the chemistry means that there was no chemical decay of the PAMS tracers<br />
so the experiments were purely emissions and dispersion.<br />
• Turning off the sampling noise means that the predicted total concentrations of PAMS<br />
species at each receptor were not altered by the sampling noise algorithm developed for<br />
this study.<br />
• Experiment 12 should be an ideal situation for CMB because the source profiles are<br />
known, there is no chemical decay and no sampling noise.<br />
Table 2-18. Design of experiments 9-12 for Round 3.<br />
Chemistry<br />
Experiment Number Yes <strong>No</strong><br />
Yes 9 10<br />
Sampling <strong>No</strong>ise<br />
<strong>No</strong> 11 12<br />
Table 2-19. Assignment of DRI source profiles to A-<strong>34</strong> source categories for Round 3.<br />
DRI Code Description A-<strong>34</strong> Category Numbers<br />
NCATsb96 <strong>No</strong>n-catalyst vehicle exhaust 1, 2, 3, 4, 8<br />
LG_EtO96 Liquid gasoline 6, 9<br />
EvaEtO96 Gasoline evaporative emissions 5<br />
TuMchHDc Tunnel diesel exhaust 7, 10<br />
CPcomp_1 Consumer products and coatings average 14, 15, 16, 17<br />
CNG/LPG 50/50 mixture of DRI’s CNG and LPG profiles 12<br />
Biogenic Isoprene 18<br />
BkgAMcom Morning ambient air samples 13, 19, 20, 21, 22<br />
2.7 INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ROUND 4<br />
In Round 4, DRI re-analyzed experiments 1-12 and could ask for any information short of the<br />
answer (the source contributions). DRI knew:<br />
• The conceptual design of each experiment.<br />
• The characteristics of the sampling noise algorithm.<br />
• Average source profiles for each receptor and experiment based on the 9 cells around<br />
each receptor.<br />
H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec2.doc 2-27