11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 2005<br />

2.6 EXPERIMENTS FOR ROUND 3<br />

Four new experiments (9-12) were developed for Round 3 after Round 2 had been completed.<br />

ENVIRON and UC Davis decided to focus Round 3 on understanding how chemical decay and<br />

sampling noise influence CMB performance in situations where the receptor model should do<br />

well.<br />

• Conduct a factorial matrix of four experiments with chemistry and sampling noise turned<br />

on and off (Table 2-18).<br />

• Prepare the PAMS emission inventories using source profiles that DRI had used for CMB<br />

analysis in Rounds 1 and 2 (Table 2-19).<br />

• Instruct DRI to use the same profiles to analyze Round 3 as Rounds 1 and 2, without<br />

revealing that Round 3 was built upon these profiles.<br />

• Turning off the chemistry means that there was no chemical decay of the PAMS tracers<br />

so the experiments were purely emissions and dispersion.<br />

• Turning off the sampling noise means that the predicted total concentrations of PAMS<br />

species at each receptor were not altered by the sampling noise algorithm developed for<br />

this study.<br />

• Experiment 12 should be an ideal situation for CMB because the source profiles are<br />

known, there is no chemical decay and no sampling noise.<br />

Table 2-18. Design of experiments 9-12 for Round 3.<br />

Chemistry<br />

Experiment Number Yes <strong>No</strong><br />

Yes 9 10<br />

Sampling <strong>No</strong>ise<br />

<strong>No</strong> 11 12<br />

Table 2-19. Assignment of DRI source profiles to A-<strong>34</strong> source categories for Round 3.<br />

DRI Code Description A-<strong>34</strong> Category Numbers<br />

NCATsb96 <strong>No</strong>n-catalyst vehicle exhaust 1, 2, 3, 4, 8<br />

LG_EtO96 Liquid gasoline 6, 9<br />

EvaEtO96 Gasoline evaporative emissions 5<br />

TuMchHDc Tunnel diesel exhaust 7, 10<br />

CPcomp_1 Consumer products and coatings average 14, 15, 16, 17<br />

CNG/LPG 50/50 mixture of DRI’s CNG and LPG profiles 12<br />

Biogenic Isoprene 18<br />

BkgAMcom Morning ambient air samples 13, 19, 20, 21, 22<br />

2.7 INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ROUND 4<br />

In Round 4, DRI re-analyzed experiments 1-12 and could ask for any information short of the<br />

answer (the source contributions). DRI knew:<br />

• The conceptual design of each experiment.<br />

• The characteristics of the sampling noise algorithm.<br />

• Average source profiles for each receptor and experiment based on the 9 cells around<br />

each receptor.<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec2.doc 2-27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!