CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
April 2005<br />
Selection of Fitting Species<br />
A prerequisite for using receptor models is that the relative proportions of chemical species<br />
change little between source and receptor. Most ambient NMHCs are oxidized in the lowest 2<br />
km of the troposphere with tropospheric lifetimes ranging from hours to several months.<br />
<strong>No</strong>minal afternoon summertime residence times for a reactive environment (e.g., Los Angeles)<br />
are estimated in Table 3-1. These estimates provide indications of which components are likely<br />
to remain relatively stable between source and receptor, thereby qualifying as fitting species for<br />
CMB source apportionment. An exception is isoprene, which is included as a fitting species<br />
despite its high reactivity because it serves as a marker for biogenic emissions. The source<br />
contribution estimates under-estimated the actual source contributions of biogenic emissions, i.e.,<br />
they provide a lower limit to biogenic contributions.<br />
Table 3-1 lists three sets of default fitting species, by site location and time of day, which we<br />
have used in past CMB analysis of PAMS hydrocarbon data. Compounds with potential<br />
analytical problems such as coelution of peaks during gas chromatographic analysis are also<br />
excluded as fitting species. Type 2 PAMS sites are located immediately downwind of the area of<br />
maximum precursor emissions and are typically placed near the downwind boundary of the<br />
central business district. An expanded list of hydrocarbons (36 species) are used as fitting<br />
species at Type 2 sites for samples collected in the morning hours prior to 9:00 am since the<br />
emissions are largely unreacted. A shorter list of more stable species (20 species) is used for<br />
samples collected between 9:00 am and 6:00 pm. Type 1 sites characterize upwind background<br />
and Type 3 sites monitor maximum ozone concentrations downwind from the fringe of the urban<br />
area. Type 4 sites characterize the extreme downwind transported ozone and its precursor<br />
concentrations exiting the area and are located near the downwind edge of the photochemical<br />
grid model domain. A shorter list of 11 fitting species is used for Type 1, 3 and 4 PAMS sites.<br />
Reactive species are retained in the CMB modeling as “floating species”, and provide useful<br />
diagnostic information. Because the CMB model calculations are based upon non-reactive<br />
fitting species, the predicted concentrations exceed the measured values by margins that increase<br />
with increasing reactivity of the species.<br />
3.2 APPLICATION OF CMB BY ROUND<br />
The validity of source contribution estimates obtained from CMB depends greatly upon the<br />
selection and application of appropriate sets of source composition profiles and “fitting” species.<br />
In an actual CMB analysis, the location and time of sample collection are known. Available<br />
emission inventory data are used to determine the major emission sources that are likely to<br />
impact the receptor site. Visual surveys of the sampling location identify local sources near the<br />
sampling site that might disproportionately influence the receptor measurements. This<br />
information is then used to select an appropriate set of source composition profiles among<br />
available alternatives and identify sources for which new or updated composition profiles are<br />
needed. The location of the sampling site in relation to source and receptor areas and time of<br />
sample collection provide a basis for selecting “fitting” species that are sufficiently nonreactive<br />
so that relative proportions of chemical species change little between source and receptor. The<br />
expectation in this present experiment is that the accuracy of the source attributions from the<br />
CMB model analysis will improve as more appropriate source profiles and fitting species are<br />
applied to the simulated ambient samples. The receptor model performance was evaluated in<br />
four rounds as described in Section 1.4. This section describes DRI’s approach for performing<br />
H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec3.doc 3-3