11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

April 2005<br />

receptors (Crestline and Lake Perris) stand out as having ambient contributions that are unrelated<br />

to the local emissions. This is because their local emissions are dominated by biogenic sources<br />

(> 65%) whereas the actual contribution of biogenics in the air is less than 10%. This is not due<br />

to chemical removal of biogenic VOCs because experiment 12 was designed to have no chemical<br />

degradation. The reason is that the air concentrations at the downwind receptors are dominated<br />

by transport of emissions (primarily the gasoline and background categories in experiment 12)<br />

from upwind locations. Other receptors show the same type of effects but smaller in magnitude.<br />

90<br />

Experiment 12<br />

Actual Contribution vs. Emissions Contribution<br />

12<br />

Anaheim<br />

80<br />

10<br />

Cr estline<br />

Di amond Bar<br />

Long Beach<br />

Van Nuys<br />

LAX<br />

Hawthor n<br />

8<br />

Lake Per r i s<br />

Actual Contribution (%)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Crestline<br />

Crestline<br />

Lake Perris<br />

Crestline<br />

Van Nuys<br />

Lake Per r i s<br />

Long Beach<br />

Lake Perris<br />

LAX<br />

LAX<br />

Hawthor n<br />

Long Beach<br />

Anahei m<br />

Di amond Bar Hawthor n<br />

Anahei m<br />

Lake Perris<br />

Van Nuys<br />

Crestline<br />

Long Beach<br />

Haw thorn<br />

Diamond Bar<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

Long Beach<br />

Van Nuys<br />

Diamond Bar<br />

Anaheim<br />

LAX<br />

Haw thorn<br />

Gasoline<br />

Diesel<br />

Solvent<br />

Biogenic<br />

Background<br />

CNG and Aged<br />

LPG<br />

1:1<br />

LAX<br />

20<br />

Diamond Bar<br />

Anaheim<br />

Anaheim<br />

10 Van Nuys<br />

Diamond Haw thorn Bar<br />

Crestline<br />

4.23<br />

Diamond Van<br />

Long<br />

Anaheim<br />

Nuys<br />

Beach<br />

Crestline Lake HawPerris<br />

thorn Bar<br />

Long AnaheimDiamond Beach Van Nuys Bar<br />

Lake Perris<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

Emissions Contribution (%)<br />

Figure 4-11. Actual and emissions contributions in experiment 12 (with no chemical reactions)<br />

by receptor, averaged over all hours.<br />

The Hawthorn and LAX receptors provide an interesting comparison in Figure 4-11. These<br />

receptors are located in adjacent grid cells and have similar emissions contributions (Figure 4-<br />

10). The actual contributions at Hawthorn and LAX differ more than the emissions<br />

contributions, as seen from Figure 4-11 for the gasoline and background categories. This shows<br />

that averaging emissions over 9 grid cells (i.e., a 15-km square) centered on the receptor does not<br />

describe differences in air composition between LAX and Hawthorn. This discrepancy must be<br />

because the upwind footprint influencing the Hawthorn and LAX receptors is not a 15-km square<br />

around the receptor.<br />

Figure 4-12 compares the actual and emissions contributions in experiment 11, which is similar<br />

to experiment 12 but includes chemical decay. The patterns of deviation from a 1:1 relationship<br />

are very similar in Figures 4-12 and Figure 4-11. This shows that the main reason for actual<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec4.doc 4-22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!