11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

April 2005<br />

from front to back is the same as Table 2-3. The same information is given quantitatively in<br />

Table A-4 of Appendix A. Table A-5 presents mean source profiles for experiment 3, “alternate<br />

source profiles.”<br />

The on-road mobile source gasoline exhaust profiles (first four A-<strong>34</strong> categories at the front of<br />

Figure 2-5) are similar, which they should be since all are based on similar fuel composition.<br />

We deliberately selected mobile source profiles that reflected the same type of fuel so that the<br />

experiments would be closer to real-world conditions. The source profiles for solvents, coatings<br />

and industrial sources toward the back of Figure 2-5 have peaks for many species that are low in<br />

the mobile source profiles toward the front of Figure 2-5. There also are species that are high in<br />

mobile and non-mobile source profiles such as ethane, the left most species in Figure 2-5.<br />

Domainwide Mean Source Profiles for Experiment 1by A-<strong>34</strong> Category<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22<br />

0.5<br />

0.45<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

PAMS Fraction<br />

0.05<br />

A-<strong>34</strong> Category<br />

1 2<strong>34</strong>5678910111213141516171819202122<br />

ETHENE<br />

ACETYL<br />

ETHANE<br />

PROPE<br />

N_PROP<br />

I_BUTA<br />

LBUT1E<br />

N_BUTA<br />

T2BUTE<br />

C2BUTE<br />

IPENTA<br />

PENTE1<br />

N_PENT<br />

I_PREN<br />

T2PENE<br />

C2PENE<br />

BU22DM<br />

CPENTA<br />

BU23DM<br />

PENA2M<br />

PENA3M<br />

P1E2ME<br />

N_HEX<br />

MCYPNA<br />

PEN24M<br />

BENZE<br />

CYHEXA<br />

HEXA2M<br />

PEN23M<br />

HEXA3M<br />

PA224M<br />

N_HEPT<br />

MECYHX<br />

PA2<strong>34</strong>M<br />

TOLUE<br />

HEP2ME<br />

HEP3ME<br />

N_OCT<br />

ETBZ<br />

MP_XYL<br />

STYR<br />

O_XYL<br />

N_NON<br />

IPRBZ<br />

N_PRBZ<br />

M_ETOL<br />

P_ETOL<br />

BZ135M<br />

O_ETOL<br />

BZ124M<br />

N_DEC<br />

BZ123M<br />

DETBZ1<br />

DETBZ2<br />

N_UNDE<br />

0<br />

Figure 2-5. Mean source profiles for experiment 1. The profiles are for 55 PAMS species over 22<br />

source categories. These are mean profiles because each A-<strong>34</strong> category may combine several<br />

SCCs that have different speciation profiles.<br />

2.5 SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR ROUND 2<br />

In Round 2, DRI analyzed the same experiments as in Round 1 but was provided with additional<br />

information that a receptor modeler would typically have available to support a “real-world”<br />

receptor model application. DRI requested information on:<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec2.doc 2-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!