11.07.2014 Views

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

CRC Report No. A-34 - Coordinating Research Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

April 2005<br />

<strong>CRC</strong> project A-42-2 (ENVIRON, 2002a). In RTRAC, an arbitrary number of additional tracer<br />

species can be added to a CAMx simulation where they are emitted, transported and deposited<br />

using the core model algorithms. The core model chemistry drives the chemical decay of<br />

RTRAC tracers by reactions with OH radical, NO 3 radical, ozone and photolysis. Compared to<br />

the alternate approach of adding “live species” to the core model the RTRAC approach has<br />

several advantages for this study:<br />

• Reactive tracers are much more computationally efficient than live species.<br />

• The oxidant fields are decoupled from uncertainties in the chemistry of the tracers.<br />

• The source strengths of the tracers may be varied without changing the oxidant fields<br />

allowing experiments to be more controlled.<br />

RTRAC was used to model atmospheric concentrations of 55 PAMS species from 22 source<br />

categories giving a total of 1210 unique tracers in each simulation. The total concentration of a<br />

PAMS species at a receptor location is the sum of tracers for that species over the 22 source<br />

categories modeled, plus a background. Sampling noise was added to this total concentration as<br />

described below. The 55 PAMS species are listed in Table 2-1 along with reaction rate constants<br />

at 298 K and background concentrations. Each PAMS species was assigned a unique “A-<strong>34</strong>”<br />

number for this study. Table 2-1 also provides the short names that DRI uses for PAMS species<br />

in receptor modeling studies. Reaction rate constants at 298 K and 1 atmosphere are given in<br />

units of cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 and are from Calvert et al. (2000, 2002), JPL (1997), Atkinson (1989)<br />

and Carter (2000). Temperature dependencies of rate constants also were accounted for in the<br />

modeling. The background concentrations shown in Table 2-1 are averages of data from San<br />

Nicolas Island (in the Pacific Ocean to the west of Los Angeles) collected during SCOS and<br />

provided by DRI.<br />

Table 2-1. PAMS species included in the modeling analysis with reaction rate constants at 298<br />

K and background concentrations.<br />

A-<strong>34</strong><br />

Num<br />

Short<br />

Name<br />

Full<br />

Name<br />

M.Wt.<br />

(g) k(OH) # k(O3) # k(NO3) # Background<br />

(ppbC) $<br />

1 ETHENE ethene 28.05 8.52E-12 1.59E-18 2.05E-16 0.503<br />

2 ACETYL acetylene 26.04 8.97E-13 0.475<br />

3 ETHANE ethane 30.07 2.68E-13 1.393<br />

4 PROPE propene 42.08 2.63E-11 1.01E-17 9.49E-15 0.292<br />

5 N_PROP n-propane 44.10 1.15E-12 0.590<br />

6 I_BUTA isobutane 58.12 2.<strong>34</strong>E-12 0.383<br />

7 LBUT1E 1-butene 56.11 3.14E-11 9.65E-18 1.35E-14 0.048<br />

8 N_BUTA n-butane 58.12 2.54E-12 0.608<br />

9 T2BUTE t-2-Butene 56.11 6.40E-11 1.90E-16 3.90E-13 0.000<br />

10 C2BUTE c-2-butene 56.11 5.64E-11 1.25E-16 3.52E-13 0.000<br />

11 IPENTA isopentane 72.15 3.90E-12 0.613<br />

12 PENTE1 1-pentene 70.13 5.14E-11 1.06E-17 1.38E-14 0.057<br />

13 N_PENT n-pentane 72.15 3.94E-12 0.367<br />

14 I_PREN isoprene 68.11 1.01E-10 1.28E-17 6.78E-13 0.000<br />

15 T2PENE t-2-pentene 70.13 6.70E-11 2.96E-16 3.70E-13 0.000<br />

16 C2PENE c-2-pentene 70.13 6.50E-11 2.09E-16 3.70E-13 0.000<br />

17 BU22DM 2,2-dimethylbutane 86.17 2.32E-12 0.047<br />

18 CPENTA cyclopentane 70.13 5.16E-12 0.000<br />

19 BU23DM 2,3-dimethylbutane 86.17 6.20E-12 0.088<br />

20 PENA2M 2-methylpentane 86.17 5.60E-12 0.382<br />

21 PENA3M 3-methylpentane 86.17 5.70E-12 0.152<br />

H:\crca<strong>34</strong>-receptor\report\Final\sec2.doc 2-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!